Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Researching sensitive topics when the participants are stigmatized, the culture is value-laden and the researcher is an insider-outsider

Researching sensitive topics when the participants are stigmatized, the culture is value-laden... This paper aims to revisit the debate on the insider-outsider positionality of the researcher in conducting qualitative research by highlighting the challenges of researching sexual harassment and harassment among stigmatized or hidden groups of individuals in a culturally value-laden backdrop in South Asia.Design/methodology/approachThe authors drew on a bricolage of methods to analyze and write this paper. First, the authors borrowed from the case study approach to select three research projects that would shed light on the argument raised in the study. Then, narratives, together with self and critical reflexivity were used to write reflective narratives, which served as data for this paper. Next, the authors used the thematic analysis method to analyze the reflective narratives. Finally, the authors drew from literature and the experiences to provide recommendations for the challenges thus identified.FindingsThe critical reflections highlight three overarching challenges the authors encountered as insider-outsiders in researching a sensitive topic among stigmatized/hidden groups in a value-laden cultural backdrop: 1) difficulty in recruitment, 2) internalized gender norms and 3) unconscious biases. Based on these challenges, the authors posit that what is pertinent is not whether a researcher is an insider, outsider or in-betweener per se, but how to maximize benefits and minimize pitfalls of being an insider or outsider and employing other means of overcoming the drawbacks. The authors also claim that being more sensitive to the culture, reflexive, flexible and experienced would help overcome challenges faced when conducting research of this nature as insiders-outsiders.Originality/valueThere appears to be little empirically derived inquiry on the insider-outsider positionality of the researchers at the intersection of sensitive topics, stigmatized participants and culture. Our reflections and suggestions address this lacuna while revisiting the simplistic use of insider-outsider dichotomy and proposing other means to overcome the drawbacks brought on by the researcher positionality. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal Emerald Publishing

Researching sensitive topics when the participants are stigmatized, the culture is value-laden and the researcher is an insider-outsider

Download PDF
20 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/researching-sensitive-topics-when-the-participants-are-stigmatized-the-91FtRbN1yx
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
1746-5648
DOI
10.1108/qrom-12-2020-2079
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This paper aims to revisit the debate on the insider-outsider positionality of the researcher in conducting qualitative research by highlighting the challenges of researching sexual harassment and harassment among stigmatized or hidden groups of individuals in a culturally value-laden backdrop in South Asia.Design/methodology/approachThe authors drew on a bricolage of methods to analyze and write this paper. First, the authors borrowed from the case study approach to select three research projects that would shed light on the argument raised in the study. Then, narratives, together with self and critical reflexivity were used to write reflective narratives, which served as data for this paper. Next, the authors used the thematic analysis method to analyze the reflective narratives. Finally, the authors drew from literature and the experiences to provide recommendations for the challenges thus identified.FindingsThe critical reflections highlight three overarching challenges the authors encountered as insider-outsiders in researching a sensitive topic among stigmatized/hidden groups in a value-laden cultural backdrop: 1) difficulty in recruitment, 2) internalized gender norms and 3) unconscious biases. Based on these challenges, the authors posit that what is pertinent is not whether a researcher is an insider, outsider or in-betweener per se, but how to maximize benefits and minimize pitfalls of being an insider or outsider and employing other means of overcoming the drawbacks. The authors also claim that being more sensitive to the culture, reflexive, flexible and experienced would help overcome challenges faced when conducting research of this nature as insiders-outsiders.Originality/valueThere appears to be little empirically derived inquiry on the insider-outsider positionality of the researchers at the intersection of sensitive topics, stigmatized participants and culture. Our reflections and suggestions address this lacuna while revisiting the simplistic use of insider-outsider dichotomy and proposing other means to overcome the drawbacks brought on by the researcher positionality.

Journal

Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal – Emerald Publishing

Published: Aug 30, 2022

Keywords: Cultural sensitivity; Insider-outsider; Reflexivity; Stigmatized groups; Sensitive topics; Recruitment; Gender roles; Unconscious biases

References

  • The choosing person: marriage, middle-class identities, and modernity in contemporary Sri Lanka
    Abeyasekera, A.L.
  • Living for others: narrating agency in the context of failed marriages and singleness in urban Sri Lanka
    Abeyasekera, A.L.
  • ‘Unwanted’ and ‘bad,’ but not ‘sexual’: non-labelling of sexual harassment by Sri Lankan working women
    Adikaram, A.S.
  • At their wits’ end? How divorced women cope with workplace harassment in Sri Lanka
    Adikaram, A.
  • ‘It’s easier that you’re a girl and that you’re Asian’: interactions of race and gender between researchers and participants
    Archer, L.
  • Politicized and depoliticized ethnicities, power relations and temporality: insights to outsider research from comparative and transnational fieldwork
    Baser, B.; Toivanen, M.
  • Status, gender and geography: power negotiations in police research
    Belur, J.
  • Using thematic analysis in psychology
    Braun, V.; Clarke, V.
  • The researcher ‘in the middle’: negotiating the insider/outsider dichotomy
    Breen, L.
  • Breaking out, breaking through: accessing knowledge in a -western overseas educational setting—methodological issues for an outsider
    Chawla-Duggan, R.
  • Insider, outsider or an in-betweener? Epistemological reflections of a legally blind researcher on conducting cross-national disability research
    Chhabra, G.
  • Negotiating insider–outsider status in ethnographic sports research
    Coombs, D.S.; Osborne, A.C.
  • On becoming a critically reflexive practitioner” redux: what does it mean to be reflexive?
    Cunliffe, A.L.
  • Sensitive interviewing in qualitative research
    Dempsey, L.; Dowling, M.; Larkin, P.; Murphy, K.
  • The space between: on being an insider-outsider in qualitative research
    Dwyer, S.C.; Buckle, J.L.
  • Personal experience and critical reflexivity in counselling and psychotherapy research
    Etherington, K.
  • Doing sensitive research sensitively: ethical and methodological issues in researching workplace bullying
    Fahie, D.
  • Outing’ the researcher: the provenance, principles and practice of reflexivity
    Finlay, L.
  • The double-edged sword of having a unique perspective: feelings of discrimination and perceived career advantages among LGBT employees
    Gacilo, J.; Steinheider, B.; Stone, T.H.; Hoffmeister, V.; Jawahar, I.M.; Garrett, T.
  • A personal touch: the most important strategy for recruiting Latino research participants
    García, A.A.; Zuñiga, J.A.; Lagon, C.
  • Doing gender in a hospital setting: reflections of a male researcher
    Gareth, T.
  • A systematic review of barriers and facilitators to minority research participation among African Americans, Latinos, Asian Americans, and Pacific Islanders
    George, S.; Duran, N.; Norris, K.
  • Work-worlds colliding: self-reflexivity, power and emotion in organizational ethnography
    Gilmore, S.; Kenny, K.
  • Not one of the guys: the female researcher in a male-dominated setting
    Gurney, J.N.
  • Examining the effect of context on responses to social interaction
    Hangartner, R.R.
  • Insider and outsider perspectives: reflection on researcher identities in research with lesbian and bisexual women
    Hayfield, N.; Huxley, C.
  • Informed consent, gatekeepers and go-betweens: negotiating consent in child and youth-orientated institutions
    Heath, S.; Charles, V.; Crow, G.; Wiles, R.
  • Remaining an outsider: membership as a threat to research rapport
    Horowitz, R.
  • Insider-outsider: activating the hyphen
    Humphrey, C.
  • Strategies to recruit minority persons: a systematic review
    IIbrahim, S.; Sidani, S.
  • Barriers to constructing experiential learning claims through reflective narratives: student’s experiences
    Ions, K.J.; Sutcliffe, N.
  • Methodological research on ‘sensitive’ topics: a decade review
    Lee, Y.O.; Lee, R.M.
  • Researcher positionality in cross-cultural and sensitive research
    Manohar, N.; Liamputtong, P.; Bhole, S.; Arora, A.; Liamputtong, P.
  • Methodological bricolage: a journey on the road less traveled in tourism studies
    O’Regan, M.
  • Staying onside on the inside: men, masculinities and the research process
    Parker, A.
  • The social and cultural construction of female sexuality and gender roles in Sri Lankan society
    Perera, S.
  • A dynamic process model for finding informants and gaining access in qualitative research
    Peticca-Harris, A.; deGama, N.; Elias, S.R.S.T.A.
  • Interviewing men: gender and the collection and interpretation of qualitative data
    Pini, B.
  • Methodological issues: conducting sensitive research on lesbian and gay men’s experience of nursing care
    Platzer, H.K.; James, T.
  • If you had balls, you’d be one of us!’ Doing gendered research: methodological reflections on being a female academic researcher in the hyper-masculine subculture of ‘football hooliganism’
    Poulton, E.
  • Moving beyond templates: a bricolage approach to conducting trustworthy qualitative research
    Pratt, M.G.; Sonenshein, S.; Feldman, M.S.
  • Narrative in social work: a critical review
    Riessman, C.K.; Quinney, L.
  • Reflexivity and ethical research practice while interviewing on sexual topics
    Rodríguez-Dorans, E.
  • Being in, being out, being with: affect and the role of the qualitative researcher in loss and grief research
    Rowling, L.
  • Sex or sensibility? The making of chaste women and promiscuous men in a Sri Lankan university setting
    Ruwanpura, E.S.
  • Gender performance in qualitative studies of masculinities
    Sallee, M.W.; Harris, F.
  • Case selection techniques in case study research: a menu of qualitative and quantitative options
    Seawright, J.; Gerring, J.
  • Lessons in cultural competence: adapting research methodology for diverse ethnic groups
    Skaff, M.M.; Chesla, C.A.; de los Mycue, V.; Fisher, L.
  • Considerations for culturally sensitive research with transgender adults: a qualitative analysis
    Staples, J.M.; Bird, E.R.; Masters, T.N.; George, W.H.
  • Cultural competence in qualitative interview methods with Asian immigrants
    Suh, E.E.; Kagan, S.; Strumpf, N.
  • Cultural insiders and research fieldwork: case examples from cross-cultural research with Thai people
    Suwankhong, D.; Liamputtong, P.
  • Doing gender in a hospital setting: reflections of a male researcher
    Thomas, G.M.
  • Challenges and strategies for conducting sensitive research with an Arab American population
    Timraz, S.M.; Alhasanat, D.I.; Albdour, M.M.; Lewin, L.; Giurgescu, C.; Kavanaugh, K.
  • Researching stigma as an outsider: considerations for qualitative outsider research
    Wigginton, B.; Setchell, J.
  • Secondary trauma: emotional safety in sensitive research
    Williamson, E.; Gregory, A.; Abrahams, H.; Aghtaie, N.; Walker, S.J.; Hester, M.
  • Effective recruitment and retention of minority research participants
    Yancey, A.K.; Ortega, A.N.; Kumanyika, S.K.
  • The case study as a serious research strategy
    Yin, R.K.
  • Recommendations for culturally sensitive research methods
    Awad, G.H.; Patall, E.A.; Rackley, K.R.; Reilly, E.D.
  • As long as you’re easy on the eye’: reflecting on issues of positionality and researcher safety during farmer interviews
    Chiswell, H.M.; Wheeler, R.
  • Ethical confessions of the “I” of autoethnography
    Doloriert, C.; Sambrook, S.
  • Toward culturally sensitive research in a multicultural society
    Henderson, D.J.; Sampselle, C.; Mayes, F.; Oakley, D.
  • Between the corporation and the closet: ethically researching LGBTQ plus identities in the workplace
    Hodson, J.; Jackson, S.; Cukier, W.; Holmes, M.
  • Qualitative research interviews
    Knox, S.; Burkard, A.W.
  • Participant overexposure and the role of researcher judgement
    Lipscomb, M.
  • Insiders and outsiders: a chapter in the sociology of knowledge
    Merton, R.K.
  • ‘It’s good to be able to talk’: an exploration of the complexities of participant and researcher relationships when conducting sensitive research
    Newton, V.L.
  • Getting to grips with bricolage: a personal account
    Wibberley, C.