Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Research methods as bridging devices: path and context mapping in governance

Research methods as bridging devices: path and context mapping in governance The purpose of this paper is to investigate the potential, both analytically and practically, of understanding research methods as bridging devices. Methods can bridge theory and empirics, but it is argued that they can perform several bridging functions: between theory and praxis, between analysis and strategy and between past and future. The focus is on those forms of bridging relevant for understanding and effectuating change in governance, at community level and at the scale of organizations.Design/methodology/approachThe paper develops a perspective on methods as bridging devices. It uses the newly minted methods of governance path and context mapping as a case study. These methods conceptually derive from evolutionary governance theory (EGT) and were developed and tested in Canadian empirical research. The case helps to develop insight in features, forms and limitations of methods as bridging devices in governance research and practice. The authors then use the case to further develop the initial concept of bridging more generally, emphasizing the shifting balance between methods as bridging and creating boundaries.FindingsBoth the case study and the theoretical analysis underline the necessary imperfection of any method as bridging device. The authors affirm the potential of method to perform different bridging functions at the same time, while revealing clear tradeoffs in each role. Tradeoffs occur with adapted versions of the method producing new strengths and weaknesses in new contexts. In each of the forms of bridging involved neither side can be reduced to the other, so a gap always remains. It is demonstrated that the practice of bridging through method in governance is greatly helped when methods are flexibly deployed in ongoing processes of bricolage, nesting and modification. Governance enables the continuous production of new framing devices and other methods.Originality/valueThe idea of methods as bridging devices is new, and can assist the development of a broader understanding of the various forms and functions of research methods. Moreover, it helps to discern roles of research methods in the functioning of governance. The context of governance helps to recognize the multi-functionality of research methods, and their transformation in a context of pressured decision-making. Moreover, this approach contributes to the understanding of governance as adumbrated by EGT. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Organizational Change Management Emerald Publishing

Research methods as bridging devices: path and context mapping in governance

Download PDF
18 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/research-methods-as-bridging-devices-path-and-context-mapping-in-c9CYiLtTCh
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
0953-4814
DOI
10.1108/jocm-06-2019-0185
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the potential, both analytically and practically, of understanding research methods as bridging devices. Methods can bridge theory and empirics, but it is argued that they can perform several bridging functions: between theory and praxis, between analysis and strategy and between past and future. The focus is on those forms of bridging relevant for understanding and effectuating change in governance, at community level and at the scale of organizations.Design/methodology/approachThe paper develops a perspective on methods as bridging devices. It uses the newly minted methods of governance path and context mapping as a case study. These methods conceptually derive from evolutionary governance theory (EGT) and were developed and tested in Canadian empirical research. The case helps to develop insight in features, forms and limitations of methods as bridging devices in governance research and practice. The authors then use the case to further develop the initial concept of bridging more generally, emphasizing the shifting balance between methods as bridging and creating boundaries.FindingsBoth the case study and the theoretical analysis underline the necessary imperfection of any method as bridging device. The authors affirm the potential of method to perform different bridging functions at the same time, while revealing clear tradeoffs in each role. Tradeoffs occur with adapted versions of the method producing new strengths and weaknesses in new contexts. In each of the forms of bridging involved neither side can be reduced to the other, so a gap always remains. It is demonstrated that the practice of bridging through method in governance is greatly helped when methods are flexibly deployed in ongoing processes of bricolage, nesting and modification. Governance enables the continuous production of new framing devices and other methods.Originality/valueThe idea of methods as bridging devices is new, and can assist the development of a broader understanding of the various forms and functions of research methods. Moreover, it helps to discern roles of research methods in the functioning of governance. The context of governance helps to recognize the multi-functionality of research methods, and their transformation in a context of pressured decision-making. Moreover, this approach contributes to the understanding of governance as adumbrated by EGT.

Journal

Journal of Organizational Change Management – Emerald Publishing

Published: Sep 16, 2021

Keywords: Strategy; Governance; Analysis; Research method; Context mapping; Path mapping

References

  • Walking new avenues in management research methods and theories: bridging micro and macro domains
    Aguinis, H.; Boyd, B.K.; Pierce, C.A.; Short, J.C.
  • Has management studies lost its way? Ideas for more imaginative and innovative research
    Alvesson, M.; Sandberg, J.
  • Hybrid genres: fieldwork, detection and the method of Bruno Latour
    Austrin, T.; Farnsworth, J.
  • Semiotics and art history
    Bal, M.; Bryson, N.
  • Governingfor resilience: the role of institutional work
    Beunen, R.; Patterson, J.; Van Assche, K.
  • Everything you wanted to know about organization theory… but were afraid to ask Slavoj Žižek
    Böhm, S.; De Cock, C.
  • What is participatory research?
    Cornwall, A.; Jewkes, R.
  • Method as argument: boundary work in evidence-based medicine
    Derkatch, C.
  • Resource mobilization in international social entrepreneurship: Bricolage as a mechanism of institutional transformation
    Desa, G.
  • Doing mixed methods research pragmatically: implications for the rediscovery of pragmatism as a research paradigm
    Feilzer, Y.M.
  • Five misunderstandings about case-study research
    Flyvbjerg, B.
  • Scholarship and practice: the contribution of ethnographic research methods to bridging the gap
    Harvey, L.J.; Myers, M.D.
  • The structure and significance of strategic episodes: social systems theory and the routine practices of strategic change
    Hendry, J.; Seidl, D.
  • Organization studies: moving entrepreneurially ahead
    Hjorth, D.; Reay, T.
  • The middle aging of new public management: into the age of paradox?
    Hood, C.; Peters, G.
  • Introduction: time, temporality and timescapes in administration and policy
    Howlett, M.; Goetz, K.H.
  • The role of meetings in the social practice of strategy
    Jarzabkowski, P.; Seidl, D.
  • Boundary crossing and learning in creation of new work practice
    Kerosuo, H.; Engeström, Y.
  • Research methods for non-representational approaches to organizational complexity: the dialogical mediated inquiry
    Lorino, P.; Tricard, B.; Clot, Y.
  • Model migrations: mobility and boundary crossings in regional climate prediction
    Mahony, M.; Hulme, M.
  • Combining IS research methods: towards a pluralist methodology
    Mingers, J.
  • Linking science and policy through community-based participatory research to study and address health disparities
    Minkler, M.
  • Ethnoecology: bridging disciplines, cultures and species
    Nabhan, G.P.
  • Misdirection in the margins of malaria elimination methods
    Peeters Grietens, K.; Gryseels, C.; Verschraegen, G.
  • Geomorphology and ecosystems: challenges and keys for success in bridging disciplines
    Renschler, C.S.; Doyle, M.W.; Thoms, M.
  • General strategy concepts and the ecology of strategy discourses: a systemic-discursive perspective
    Seidl, D.
  • Learning at trade vocational school and learning at work: boundary crossing in apprentices’ everyday life
    Tanggaard, L.
  • The complexity–sustainability trade–off in niklas luhmann’s social systems theory
    Valentinov, V.
  • Mapping institutional work as a method for local strategy; learning from boom/bust dynamics in the Canadian west
    Van Assche, K.; Gruezmacher, M.; Deacon, L.
  • Power/knowledge and natural resource management: Foucaultian foundations in the analysis of adaptive governance
    Van Assche, K.; Beunen, R.; Duineveld, M.; Gruezmacher, M.
  • The social, the ecological, and the adaptive. Von Bertalanffy’s general systems theory and the adaptive governance of social-ecological systems
    Van Assche, K.; Verschraegen, G.; Valentinov, V.; Gruezmacher, M.
  • Boom & Bust. Local strategy for big events. A community survival guide to turbulent times
    Van Assche, K.; Deacon, L.; Gruezmacher, M.; Summers, R.; Lavoie, S.; Jones, K.; Parkins, J.
  • The current state of sociological theory: diversity, polarity, empiricism, and small theories
    Warshay, L.H.
  • Interpretation in policy analysis: on methods and practice
    Yanow, D.
  • Pragmatism and the philosophical foundations of mixed methods research
    Biesta, G.; Tashakkori, A.; Teddlie, C.
  • ‘Paradigms lost’: on theory and method in research in marketing
    Deshpande, R.
  • Describing the bricolage: conceptualizing a new rigor in qualitative research
    Kincheloe, J.L.
  • Extended translation: a sociocognitive research agenda
    Risku, H.; Windhager, F.
  • Contextualizing theories and practices of bricolage research
    Rogers, M.