Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Ľuboš Pástor (1999)
Portfolio Selection and Asset Pricing ModelsChicago Booth: Fama-Miller Working Paper Series
W. Goetzmann, J. Ingersoll, S. Ross (2001)
High-Water Marks and Hedge Fund Management ContractsInternational Center for Finance at Yale School of Management
A. Lo (2001)
Risk Management for Hedge Funds: Introduction and OverviewFinancial Analysts Journal, 57
Suleyman Basak, A. Shapiro, Lucie Teplá (2001)
Risk Management with BenchmarkingMicroeconomic Theory eJournal
M. Brennan, Eduardo Schwartz (1977)
The Valuation of American Put OptionsJournal of Finance, 32
R. Elliott, Leunglung Chan (2004)
Perpetual American options with fractional Brownian motionQuantitative Finance, 4
T. Bielecki, Hanqing Jin, S. Pliska, X. Zhou (2005)
CONTINUOUS‐TIME MEAN‐VARIANCE PORTFOLIO SELECTION WITH BANKRUPTCY PROHIBITIONMathematical Finance, 15
Eduardo Schwartz (1977)
The valuation of warrants: Implementing a new approachJournal of Financial Economics, 4
S. Sundaresan (2000)
Continuous-Time Methods in Finance: A Review and an AssessmentJournal of Finance, 55
F. Black, Myron Scholes (1973)
The Pricing of Options and Corporate LiabilitiesJournal of Political Economy, 81
S. Boyarchenko, S. Levendorskii (2001)
Perpetual American Options Under L[e-acute]vy ProcessesSIAM J. Control. Optim., 40
Xun Li, X. Zhou (2006)
Continuous-time mean-variance efficiency: the 80% ruleAnnals of Applied Probability, 16
Stephen Brown, W. Goetzmann, James Park (2000)
Careers and Survival: Competition and Risk in the Hedge Fund and Cta IndustryNYU: Salomon Center (Topic)
P. Samuelson (1969)
LIFETIME PORTFOLIO SELECTION BY DYNAMIC STOCHASTIC PROGRAMMING
J. Harrison, David Kreps (1979)
Martingales and arbitrage in multiperiod securities marketsJournal of Economic Theory, 20
Xun Li, X. Zhou, Andrew Lim (2001)
Dynamic Mean-Variance Portfolio Selection with No-Shorting ConstraintsSIAM J. Control. Optim., 40
J. Cox, Chi-Fu Huang (1989)
Optimal consumption and portfolio policies when asset prices follow a diffusion processJournal of Economic Theory, 49
X. Zhou, Duan Li (2000)
Continuous-Time Mean-Variance Portfolio Selection: A Stochastic LQ FrameworkApplied Mathematics and Optimization, 42
N. Hakansson. (1971)
Capital Growth and the Mean-Variance Approach to Portfolio SelectionJournal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 6
M. David (1979)
HARRISON, J. Michael, and KREPS, . Martingales and Arbitrage in Multiperiod Securities Markets, Journal of Economic Theory, , ., 20
Duan Li, W. Ng (2000)
Optimal Dynamic Portfolio Selection: Multiperiod Mean‐Variance FormulationMathematical Finance, 10
J. Cox, S. Ross, M. Rubinstein. (1979)
Option pricing: A simplified approach☆Journal of Financial Economics, 7
J. Cox, S. Ross (1976)
The valuation of options for alternative stochastic processesJournal of Financial Economics, 3
D. Duffie, H. Richardson (1991)
Mean-variance hedging in continuous timeAnnals of Applied Probability, 1
R. Elliott (1999)
Mathematics of Financial Markets
R. Geske, H. Johnson (1984)
The American Put Option Valued AnalyticallyJournal of Finance, 39
P. Boyle (1977)
Options: A Monte Carlo approachJournal of Financial Economics, 4
I. Karatzas, S. Shreve (2010)
Methods of Mathematical Finance
Purpose – One of the agency conflicts between investors and managers in fund management is reflected by risk‐taking behaviors led by their different goals. The investors may stop their investments in risky assets before the end of the investment horizon to minimize risk, while the managers may do so to entrench their reputation so as to pursue better opportunities in the labor market. This study aims to consider a one principal‐one agent model to investigate this agency conflict. Design/methodology/approach – The paper derives optimal asset allocation strategies for both parties by extending the traditional dynamic mean‐variance model and considering possibilities of optimal early stopping. Doing so illustrates the principal‐agent conflict regarding risk‐taking behaviors and managerial investment myopia in fund management. Practical implications – This paper not only paves the way for further studies along this line, but also presents results useful for practitioners in the money management industry. Findings – According to the theoretical analysis and numerical simulations, the paper shows that potential early stop can make the agency conflict worsen, and it proposes a way to mitigate this agency problem. Originality/value – As one of the exploratory studies in investigating agency conflict regarding risk‐taking behaviors in the literature, this study makes multiple contributions to the literature on fund management, asset allocation, portfolio optimization, and risk management.
The Journal of Risk Finance – Emerald Publishing
Published: Feb 29, 2008
Keywords: Fund management; Investments; Risk management; Modelling
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.