Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
E. Mack (2015)
Elbow Room for Rights
B. Leidner, Emanuele Castano, Jeremy Ginges (2013)
Dehumanization, Retributive and Restorative Justice, and Aggressive Versus Diplomatic Intergroup Conflict Resolution StrategiesPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39
Nicola Pless (2007)
Understanding Responsible Leadership: Role Identity and Motivational DriversJournal of Business Ethics, 74
Brent Scott, J. Colquitt, Cindy Zapata-Phelan (2007)
Justice as a dependent variable: subordinate charisma as a predictor of interpersonal and informational justice perceptions.The Journal of applied psychology, 92 6
J. Colquitt, J. Rodell (2011)
Justice, Trust, and Trustworthiness: A Longitudinal Analysis Integrating Three Theoretical PerspectivesAcademy of Management Journal, 54
Matthew Robinson (2001)
Justice Blind? Ideals and Realities of American Criminal Justice
R. Folger, Blair Sheppard, R. Buttram (1995)
Equity, equality, and need: Three faces of social justice.
Family Law Quarterly
A. Ashworth, Mike Redmayne (2019)
The Criminal Process
Cam Caldwell, Stephen Clapham (2003)
Organizational Trustworthiness: An International PerspectiveJournal of Business Ethics, 47
R. Nozick (1975)
Anarchy, State, and UtopiaPrinceton Readings in Political Thought
L. Bobo, Victor Thompson (2014)
Unfair by Design: The War on Drugs, Race, and the Legitimacy of the Criminal Justice SystemSocial Research: An International Quarterly, 73
P. Primeaux, Ranjan Karri, Cam Caldwell (2003)
Cultural Insights to Justice: A Theoretical Perspective Through a Subjective LensJournal of Business Ethics, 46
Human Rights, 26
Justice and Social Interaction, 3
L. Hosmer (1995)
TRUST: THE CONNECTING LINK BETWEEN ORGANIZATIONAL THEORY AND PHILOSOPHICAL ETHICSAcademy of Management Review, 20
T. Tyler (2000)
Social Justice: Outcome and ProcedureInternational Journal of Psychology, 35
Benhua Xu, Feng Xu, Cam Caldwell, G. Sheard, Larry Floyd (2016)
Organizational trustworthiness – empirical insights from a Chinese perspectiveJournal of Management Development, 35
J. Darley, T. Pittman (2003)
The Psychology of Compensatory and Retributive JusticePersonality and Social Psychology Review, 7
A. Nuzzo (2012)
Memory, History, Justice
Stephen Clapham, C. Meyer, Cam Caldwell, G. Proctor (2014)
Trustworthiness, Justice and the Mediating LensJournal of Business and Behavior Sciences, 26
Doug Lennick, F. Kiel, Kathy Jordan (2011)
Moral Intelligence 2.0: Enhancing Business Performance and Leadership Success in Turbulent Times
R. Solomon (1992)
Ethics and Excellence: Cooperation and Integrity in Business
Cam Caldwell, Zuhair Hasan, S. Smith (2015)
Virtuous leadership – insights for the 21st centuryJournal of Management Development, 34
R. Bies (1986)
Interactional justice : communication criteria of fairness, 1
Journal of Business Ethics, 98
L. Hosmer (2011)
The ethics of management : a multidisciplinary approach
PurposeThe current criminal justice system is pledged to serve and protect society while preserving the rights of those who are accused. The purpose of this paper is to explore the premise of “innocent until proven guilty” and examine whether this assumption truly prevails under the current criminal justice system, or be modified to accommodate a sliding continuum of virtuosity.Design/methodology/approachThis paper is a conceptual paper which relies heavily on the current literature about criminal justice and related ethical issues.FindingsThe paper argues that today’s criminal justice system fails to meet the standards of the virtuous continuum and that those who oversee that system need to rethink how the system operates and is perceived by the public if they wish the criminal justice system to be perceived as just, fair, and ethically responsible.Research limitations/implicationsBecause this paper is a conceptual paper it does not present research hypotheses.Practical implicationsThis paper suggests that “virtue” and “ethics” must be the foundation upon which the criminal justice system is evaluated, and criminal justice must incorporate an ethical standard which is virtuous and fair to all parties and leaders who oversee that system must meet the standards suggested by the virtuous continuum.Originality/valueThis paper is among the first to identify the viewpoint of the virtuous perspective, moral perspective, amoral perspective, and immoral perspective in the criminal justice system.
International Journal of Public Leadership – Emerald Publishing
Published: May 8, 2017
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.