Reflexive guidelines for writing organizational culture

Reflexive guidelines for writing organizational culture Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide guidelines for reflexive ethnographic writing that transports the researcher's claims of having conducted participatory reflexive research to her audience. Design/methodology/approach – Auto‐ethnographic vignettes from the author's own ethnographic research are used to establish five levels of reflexivity for writing organizational ethnography. Findings – The author argues that the audience needs to be able to judge a researcher's claims to reflexivity through his/her writing. Yet, due to the participation mode of reflexivity while doing ethnographic research, the researcher is not in control over his/her own reflexive writing. Therefore, processes between three groups of stakeholders, namely researcher, field and audience, and their power relations need to be considered in reflexive writing. The author calls this process ethnographic triangulating and derives a five‐tiered model of reflexive writing from it. Research limitations/implications – The paper offers a perspective on how to write organizational ethnography. Others will have to put this perspective into practice. Originality/value – The paper moves the participation mode of reflexivity to the level of writing, thereby offering a fully conceived view on reflexivity that acknowledges the influence of field and audience on ethnographic writing. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal Emerald Publishing

Reflexive guidelines for writing organizational culture

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/reflexive-guidelines-for-writing-organizational-culture-5Xuzh3DTIo
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
1746-5648
D.O.I.
10.1108/17465641111159134
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide guidelines for reflexive ethnographic writing that transports the researcher's claims of having conducted participatory reflexive research to her audience. Design/methodology/approach – Auto‐ethnographic vignettes from the author's own ethnographic research are used to establish five levels of reflexivity for writing organizational ethnography. Findings – The author argues that the audience needs to be able to judge a researcher's claims to reflexivity through his/her writing. Yet, due to the participation mode of reflexivity while doing ethnographic research, the researcher is not in control over his/her own reflexive writing. Therefore, processes between three groups of stakeholders, namely researcher, field and audience, and their power relations need to be considered in reflexive writing. The author calls this process ethnographic triangulating and derives a five‐tiered model of reflexive writing from it. Research limitations/implications – The paper offers a perspective on how to write organizational ethnography. Others will have to put this perspective into practice. Originality/value – The paper moves the participation mode of reflexivity to the level of writing, thereby offering a fully conceived view on reflexivity that acknowledges the influence of field and audience on ethnographic writing.

Journal

Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International JournalEmerald Publishing

Published: Aug 23, 2011

Keywords: Ethnography; Auto‐ethnography; Reflexivity; Writing culture; Research methods; Organizational culture

References

  • Analytic autoethnography
    Anderson, L.
  • Reflexivity: recursion and relationality in organizational research processes
    Hibbert, P.; Coupland, C.; MacIntosh, R.
  • Using triangulation to validate themes in qualitative studies
    Johnson, K.; Jehn, K.
  • Methodological emotional reflexivity: the role of researcher emotions in grounded theory research
    Munkejord, K.
  • Reflexivity in the co‐production of academic‐practitioner research
    Orr, K.; Bennett, M.
  • Towards an integrative reflexivity in organisational research
    Tomkins, L.; Eatough, V.
  • Ethnography then and now
    Van Maanen, J.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create folders to
organize your research

Export folders, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off