Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Maes, A. Teller, M. Erhard, C. Liquete, L. Braat, P. Berry, Benis Egoh, P. Puydarrieux, Christel Fiorina, F. Santos-Martín, M. Paracchini, H. Keune, H. Wittmer, J. Hauck, Ingeborg Fiala, P. Verburg, S. Condé, J. Schägner, J. San-Miguel-Ayanz, C. Estreguil, Ole Ostermann, J. Barredo, H. Pereira, A. Stott, Valérie Laporte, A. Meiner, Branislav Olah, E. Gelabert, Rania Spyropoulou, J. Petersen, Cathy Maguire, N. Zal, E. Achilleos, A. Rubin, L. Ledoux, Patrick Murphy, Marco Fritz, Claire Brown, C. Raes, S. Jacobs, Perrine Raquez, M. Vandewalle, David Connor, G. Bidoglio (2013)
Mapping and assessment of ecosystems and their services - An analytical framework for ecosystem assessments under action 5 of the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020
M. Vardon, R. Martinez-Lagunes, H. Gan, M. Nagy (2012)
The System of Environmental-Economic Accounting for Water: Development, Implementation and Use
H. Peskin, M. Angeles (2001)
Accounting for Environmental Services: Contrasting the SEEA and the ENRAP ApproachesReview of Income and Wealth, 47
A. Sen, J. Stiglitz, Jean-Paul Fitoussi (2010)
Mis-measuring our lives : why GDP doesn't add up?
I. Kubiszewski, R. Costanza, C. Franco, Philip Lawn, J. Talberth, Tim Jackson, Camille Aylmer (2013)
Beyond GDP: Measuring and achieving global genuine progressEcological Economics, 93
I. Bateman, G. Mace, Carlo Fezzi, G. Atkinson, K. Turner (2011)
Economic Analysis for Ecosystem Service AssessmentsEnvironmental and Resource Economics, 48
(1995)
If the GDP is up, why is America down?
W. Nordhaus, J. Tobin (1973)
Is growth obsolete
J. Bishop, P. Brink, H. Gundimeda, Pushpam Kumar, C. Nesshöver, C. Schröter‐Schlaack, B. Simmons, P. Sukhdev, H. Wittmer (2010)
The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity : mainstreaming the economics of nature : a synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB
A. Vanoli (1995)
REFLECTIONS ON ENVIRONMENTAL ACCOUNTING ISSUESReview of Income and Wealth, 41
G. Berks (1999)
Nature''s Numbers: Expanding the National Economic Accounts to Include the Environment
Petros Vourvachis (2016)
Tools of Legitimacy: The Case of the Petrobras Corporate BlogSocial and Environmental Accountability Journal, 36
D. Pearce, G. Atkinson (1993)
Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainabilityEcological Economics, 8
P. Bartelmus (1987)
Beyond GDP--New Approaches to Applied StatisticsReview of Income and Wealth, 33
K. Mcafee (1999)
Selling Nature to save It? Biodiversity and Green DevelopmentalismEnvironment and Planning D: Society and Space, 17
K. Mäler, Sara Aniyar, Å. Jansson (2009)
Accounting for EcosystemsEnvironmental and Resource Economics, 42
R. Costanza, R. D'arge, R. Groot, S. Farber, M. Grasso, B. Hannon, K. Limburg, S. Naeem, R. O'Neill, J. Paruelo, R. Raskin, P. Sutton, M. Belt (1997)
The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capitalNature, 387
R. Solow (1973)
Intergenerational Equity and Exhaustable Resources
(2014)
What’s beyond GDP?”, Human Dimensions
Maes Joachim, Teller Anne, Erhard Markus, L. Camino, Braat Leon, Berry Pam, Egoh Nchine, Puydarrieux Philippe, Fiorin-Puybaret Christel, S. Fernando, Paracchini Maria-Luisa, Keune Hans, Wittmer Heidi, H. Jennifer, Fiala Ingeborg, Verburg Peter, C. Sophie, Schagner Philipp, S. Jesus, E. Christine, O. Peter, Barredo Ignacio, M. Henrique, S. Andrew, L. Valérie, Meiner Andrus, Olah Branislav, Gelabert Eva, S. Rania, P. Jan-Erik, M. Cathy, Zal Nihal, Achilleos Evdokia, R. Angelika, Ledoux Laure, Murphy Patrick, F. Marco, Brown Claire, Rae Caroline, Jacobs Sander, Raquez Perinne, V. marie, C. David, Bidoglio Giovanni (2013)
Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services – An analytical framework for ecosystem assessments under Action 5 of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020. Discussion paper
(1968)
Remarks at the University of Kansas
Nicolás Kosoy, E. Corbera (2010)
Payments for ecosystem services as commodity fetishismEcological Economics, 69
C. Adams (2015)
The International Integrated Reporting Council: A call to actionCritical Perspectives on Accounting, 27
(1993)
The draft handbook and the UNSTAT framework: comments
G. Lange, K. Hamilton, Giovanni Ruta, L. Chakraborti, Deval Desai, B. Edens (2011)
The changing wealth of nations
R. Costanza, M. Hart, Stephen Posner, J. Talberth (2009)
Beyond GDP: The Need for New Measures of Progress
R. Gray (1990)
The greening of accountancy : the profession after Pearce
R. Costanza, I. Kubiszewski, E. Giovannini, H. Lovins, J. Mcglade, K. Pickett, K. Ragnarsdóttir, Debra Roberts, R. Vogli, R. Wilkinson (2014)
Development: Time to leave GDP behindNature, 505
E. Barbier (2013)
Wealth accounting, ecological capital and ecosystem servicesEnvironment and Development Economics, 18
C. Obst, M. Vardon (2014)
Recording environmental assets in the national accountsOxford Review of Economic Policy, 30
B. Edens, L. Hein (2013)
Towards a consistent approach for ecosystem accountingEcological Economics, 90
K. Hamilton, Michael Clemens (1999)
Genuine Savings Rates in Developing CountriesThe World Bank Economic Review, 13
M. Vardon, M. Lenzen, S. Peevor, M. Creaser (2007)
Water accounting in AustraliaEcological Economics, 61
E. Bennett, R. Biggs, P. Choo, J. Foley, Pushpam Kumar, Marcus Lee, R. Moss, G. Petschel-Held, Sarah Porter, S. Schneider, A. Cropper, H. Mooney, J. Sarukhán, A. Whyte, G. Gallopin, R. Kasperson, M. Munasinghe, Léon Olivé, C. Padoch, J. Romm, H. Vessuri, R. Hassan, E. Lambin, L. Lebel, R. Leemans, Liu Jiyuan, J. Malingreau, R. May, A. Mccalla, A. Mcmichael, B. Moldan, H. Mooney, S. Naeem, G. Nelson, S. Pagiola, D. Pauly, Steve Percy, P. Pingali, R. Prescott-Allen, W. Reid, T. Ricketts, C. Samper, B. Scholes, H. Simons, F. Tóth, J. Turpie, R. Watson, T. Wilbanks, Meryl Williams, Stan Wood, Z. Shidong, M. Zurek, J. Alcamo, Neville Ash, C. Butler, B. Callicott, D. Capistrano, S. Carpenter, J. Castilla, R. Chambers, K. Chopra, G. Daily, P. Dasgupta, R.W.J. Groot, Thomas Dietz, A. Duraiappah, M. Gadgil, K. Hamilton (2003)
Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment
Y. Ahmad (1989)
Environmental Accounting for Sustainable Development
J. Hartwick (2017)
Intergenerational equity and the investing of rents from exhaustible resourcesThe American Economic Review, 67
J. Flower (2015)
The International Integrated Reporting Council: A story of failureCritical Perspectives on Accounting, 27
J. Rockström, J. Rockström, W. Steffen, W. Steffen, K. Noone, Åsa Persson, Åsa Persson, F. Chapin, E. Lambin, T. Lenton, M. Scheffer, C. Folke, C. Folke, H. Schellnhuber, B. Nykvist, B. Nykvist, C. Wit, T. Hughes, S. Leeuw, H. Rodhe, S. Sörlin, S. Sörlin, P. Snyder, R. Costanza, R. Costanza, U. Svedin, M. Falkenmark, M. Falkenmark, Louise Karlberg, Louise Karlberg, R. Corell, V. Fabry, J. Hansen, B. Walker, Brianna Walker, D. Liverman, D. Liverman, K. Richardson, P. Crutzen, J. Foley (2009)
A safe operating space for humanityNature, 461
G. Asheim, M. Weitzman (2001)
Does NNP Growth Indicate Welfare ImprovementEconomics Letters, 73
M. Haan, Steven Keuning (1996)
Taking the Environment into Account: The NAMEA ApproachReview of Income and Wealth, 42
P. Dasgupta (2008)
The Welfare Economic Theory of Green National AccountsEnvironmental and Resource Economics, 42
(1933)
The concept of income
Purpose – This paper aims to increase awareness of work on accounting for natural capital at the national and international level that has been ongoing for many years and has recently culminated in the adoption of international statistical standards for environmental-economic accounting. Design/methodology/approach – The paper provides the context for work on natural capital accounting with particular links to the measurement of progress and a brief history of the work on natural capital accounting from an official statistics perspective and summarizes the key aspects of the technical and accounting aspects of the new international statistical standards. The paper also outlines some of the limitations of the approach and required research. Findings – The paper highlights that while natural capital accounting does not provide a complete basis for assessment of sustainable development, a broad body of work is now in place to use accounting approaches for the assessment of environmental sustainability. Research limitations/implications – The paper observes that much of the work on natural capital accounting from the perspective of the official statistics community has not engaged the academic community and there is strong potential for collaboration to take this work forward particularly in the area of land and ecosystem accounting. Social implications – The paper describes a framework for the organization of information on the links between environmental and economic issues and an indication of the relevance of this work for the broader measurement of progress. Compilation of data following the framework is intended to provide a broader base of information for public policy and other decisions and thus has the potential to influence social, economic and environmental outcomes. Originality/value – The paper’s value lies in raising awareness of the work that has been developing outside of the academic community but which likely has many connections to existing research and ongoing policy discussions.
Sustainability Accounting Management and Policy Journal – Emerald Publishing
Published: Sep 7, 2015
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.