Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
V. Narayanan, Liam Fahey (1982)
The Micro-Politics of Strategy Formulation1Academy of Management Review, 7
Fernando Suarez, J. Utterback (1995)
Dominant Designs and the Survival of Firms
K. Eisenhardt, B. Tabrizi (1995)
Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Computer IndustryAdministrative Science Quarterly, 40
David Baldridge, S. Floyd, Ĺ. Markóczy (2004)
Are managers from Mars and academicians from venus? Toward an understanding of the relationship between academic quality and practical relevanceSouthern Medical Journal, 25
T. Das (2003)
Managerial Perceptions and the Essence of the Managerial World: What is an Interloper Business Executive to Make of the Academic-Researcher Perceptions of Managers?British Journal of Management, 14
R. Cooper (1975)
Why new industrial products failIndustrial Marketing Management, 4
N. Doherty, Fiona Ellis-Chadwick, C. Hart (2003)
An analysis of the factors affecting the adoption of the Internet in the UK retail sectorJournal of Business Research, 56
E. Dahan, V. Srinivasan (2000)
The Predictive Power of Internet‐Based Product Concept Testing Using Visual Depiction and AnimationJournal of Product Innovation Management, 17
M. Hitt (1998)
Twenty-First-Century Organizations: Business Firms, Business Schools, and the AcademyAcademy of Management Review, 23
D. Dougherty (1992)
Interpretive Barriers to Successful Product Innovation in Large FirmsOrganization Science, 3
D. Littler, A. Pearson (1972)
Marketing a new industrial good: A case studyIndustrial Marketing Management, 1
Angie Craig, S. Hart (1992)
Where to Now in New Product Development ResearchEuropean Journal of Marketing, 26
R. Rothwell (1977)
The characteristics of successful innovators and technically progressive firms (with some comments on innovation research)R & D Management, 7
J. Cornelissen (2002)
Academic and Practitioner Theories of MarketingMarketing Theory, 2
R. Mowday (1997)
Reaffirming Our Scholarly ValuesAcademy of Management Review, 22
R. Cooper (1980)
Project NewProd: Factors in New Product SuccessEuropean Journal of Marketing, 14
C. Katsikeas, Shengliang Deng, Lawrence Wortzel (1997)
Perceived Export Success Factors of Small and Medium-Sized Canadian FirmsJournal of International Marketing, 5
Daniel Smith (2003)
The importance and challenges of being interestingJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31
R. Cooper (1979)
Identifying industrial new product success: Project NewProdIndustrial Marketing Management, 8
Marketing Papers, Wharton School, J. Armstrong, Tim Ambler, A. Bedeian, J. Campanario, Don Esslemont, K. Green, Raymond Hubbard, Sandra Jones, Andrew Parsons, John Rossiter, William Ross, H. Rotfeld, Byron Sharp, Mary Haight, Phil Kwan, Sapna Patel (2016)
Discovery and communication of important marketing findings: evidence and proposals
R. Cooper, E. Kleinschmidt (1990)
New product success factors: A comparison of ‘kills’ versus successes and failuresR & D Management, 20
A. Johne, P. Snelson (1988)
Marketing's role in successful product developmentJournal of Marketing Management, 3
M. Novit (1979)
The retirement amendments: Why the concern?Business Horizons, 22
J. Langrish, M. Gibbons, W. Evans, F. Jevons (1972)
Wealth from Knowledge
R. Cooper (1992)
The newprod system: The industry experienceJournal of Product Innovation Management, 9
J. Armstrong (2008)
Does an Academic Research Paper Contain Useful Knowledge? No (P<.05)
C. Crawford (1979)
New Product Failure Rates — Facts and FallaciesResearch management, 22
R. Cooper, E. Kleinschmidt (1987)
Success factors in product innovationIndustrial Marketing Management, 16
Peter Link (1987)
Keys to new product success and failureIndustrial Marketing Management, 16
Recently there has been debate about whether or not academic research and theories in management are ‘relevant’. The discussion has been extended to marketing and we explore whether or not there is a disconnection between marketing practice and the methodologies, theories and concepts put forward by marketing academics. The possible explanations for the divide between ‘theory’ and ‘practice’ in marketing are assessed. We then focus on new product development and consider the practical implications of the considerable corps of research aimed at identifying the influences affecting new product success. We continue by discussing the traditional representation of new product development. This assumes a staged process that can be managed, but which ignores in particular the impact of uncertainty. We conclude by suggesting that marketing needs to reappraise its model of the new product development process.
EuroMed Journal of Business – Emerald Publishing
Published: Apr 1, 2006
Keywords: Research in marketing; New product development; Theories‐in‐use; Uncertainty
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.