Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Reduced to the max: firm performance and organizational ambidexterity research

Reduced to the max: firm performance and organizational ambidexterity research For nearly three decades, numerous scholars have searched for a robust relationship between firm performance and organizational ambidexterity—so far with questionable results. The aim of this short essay is thus to critically examine the performance of applied performance measurements.Design/methodology/approachAfter discussing methodological issues and revealing a conceptually neglected “level” distinction in organizational ambidexterity studies, we contribute to conceptual clarity as to whether exploration and exploitation ought to be conceived as continuous or orthogonal.FindingsFirst, even if the dichotomy of exploration and exploitation is orthogonally conceptualized, at least one trade-off, either on the level of the explanans or the level of the explanandum, can be bypassed but cannot conceptually be denied. Second, we conclude that explaining overall firm performance with the relation of just two variables (exploration and exploitation)—referring to the inherently conflicting title of this paper, “Reduced to the Max”—is a hazardous endeavor.Research limitations/implicationsBased on these insights, future research may benefit from studying organizational ambidexterity and firm performance more qualitatively and paying more attention to the declared level distinction.Originality/valueThe paper reveals a crucial neglect of level and provides an answer to one of the core questions of organizational ambidexterity research: that of continuity vs orthogonality. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Strategy and Management Emerald Publishing

Reduced to the max: firm performance and organizational ambidexterity research

Download PDF
11 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/reduced-to-the-max-firm-performance-and-organizational-ambidexterity-JUeuFzcW0T
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
1755-425X
DOI
10.1108/jsma-06-2020-0149
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

For nearly three decades, numerous scholars have searched for a robust relationship between firm performance and organizational ambidexterity—so far with questionable results. The aim of this short essay is thus to critically examine the performance of applied performance measurements.Design/methodology/approachAfter discussing methodological issues and revealing a conceptually neglected “level” distinction in organizational ambidexterity studies, we contribute to conceptual clarity as to whether exploration and exploitation ought to be conceived as continuous or orthogonal.FindingsFirst, even if the dichotomy of exploration and exploitation is orthogonally conceptualized, at least one trade-off, either on the level of the explanans or the level of the explanandum, can be bypassed but cannot conceptually be denied. Second, we conclude that explaining overall firm performance with the relation of just two variables (exploration and exploitation)—referring to the inherently conflicting title of this paper, “Reduced to the Max”—is a hazardous endeavor.Research limitations/implicationsBased on these insights, future research may benefit from studying organizational ambidexterity and firm performance more qualitatively and paying more attention to the declared level distinction.Originality/valueThe paper reveals a crucial neglect of level and provides an answer to one of the core questions of organizational ambidexterity research: that of continuity vs orthogonality.

Journal

Journal of Strategy and Management – Emerald Publishing

Published: Jan 25, 2021

Keywords: Ambidexterity; Exploration; Exploitation; Performance measurement; Continuity vs orthogonality

References

  • Exploratory and exploitative learning in new product development: a social capital perspective on new technology ventures in China
    Atuahene-Gima, K.; Murray, J.Y.
  • Making the next move: how experiential and vicarious learning shape the locations of chains' acquisitions
    Baum, J.A.C.; Li, S.X.; Usher, J.M.
  • A self-presentational view of social phenomena
    Baumeister, R.F.
  • Friends or strangers? Firm-specific uncertainty, market uncertainty, and network partner selection
    Beckman, C.M.; Haunschild, P.R.; Phillips, D.J.
  • The influence of founding team company Affiliations on firm behavior
    Beckman, C.M.
  • Exploitation, exploration, and process management: the productivity dilemma revisited
    Benner, M.J.; Tushman, M.L.
  • Alternative knowledge strategies, competitive environment, and organizational performance in small manufacturing firms
    Bierly, P.E.; Daly, P.S.
  • Clarifying the distinctive contribution of ambidexterity to the field of organization studies
    Birkinshaw, J.; Gupta, A.K.
  • The locus of innovation: the effect of a separate innovation unit on exploration, exploitation, and ambidexterity in manufacturing and service firms
    Blindenbach-Driessen, F.; van den Ende, J.
  • Disruptive technologies: catching the wave
    Bower, J.L.; Christensen, C.M.
  • Unpacking organizational ambidexterity: dimensions, contingencies, and synergistic effects
    Cao, Q.; Gedajlovic, E.; Zhang, H.
  • Performance outcomes of interaction, balance, and alignment between exploration and exploitation in the technological innovation domain
    Cembrero, D.; Sáenz, J.
  • The ambidextrous organization: designing dual structures for innovation
    Duncan, R.; Kilmann, R.H.; Pondy, L.R.; Slevin, D.
  • Efficiency, flexibility, or both? Evidence linking strategy to performance in small firms
    Ebben, J.J.; Johnson, A.C.
  • The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity
    Gibson, C.B.; Birkinshaw, J.
  • The past is the past—or is it? The use of retrospective accounts as indicators of past strategy
    Golden, B.R.
  • Further remarks on retrospective accounts in organizational and strategic management research
    Golden, B.R.
  • Consistently capricious: simultaneous and sequential exploration and exploitation
    Goossen, M.C.; Bazazzian, N.
  • The interplay between exploration and exploitation
    Gupta, A.K.; Smith, K.G.; Shalley, C.E.
  • Strategic ambidexterity and performance in international new ventures
    Han, M.; Celly, N.
  • Exploration vs Exploitation: an empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis
    He, Z.-L.; Wong, P.-K.
  • Studies in the logic of explanation
    Hempel, C.G.; Oppenheim, P.
  • Ambidexterity in corporate venturing: simultaneously using existing and building new capabilities
    Hill, S.A.; Birkinshaw, J.
  • Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators
    Jansen, J.J.P.; van den Bosch, F.A.J.; Volberda, H.W.
  • Senior team Attributes and organizational ambidexterity: the moderating role of transformational leadership
    Jansen, J.J.P.; George, G.; van den Bosch, F.A.J.; Volberda, H.W.
  • Structural differentiation and ambidexterity: the mediating role of integration mechanisms
    Jansen, J.J.P.; Tempelaar, M.P.; van den Bosch, F.A.J.; Volberda, H.W.
  • Organizational ambidexterity and performance: a meta-analysis
    Junni, P.; Sarala, R.M.; Taras, V.; Tarba, S.Y.
  • Something old, something new: a longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction
    Katila, R.; Ahuja, G.
  • Exploration and exploitation as complements
    Knott, A.M.; Choo, C.W.; Bontis, N.
  • Balance within and across domains: the performance implications of exploration and exploitation in alliances
    Lavie, D.; Kang, J.; Rosenkopf, L.
  • Exploration and exploitation in the presence of network externalities
    Lee, J.; Lee, J.; Lee, H.
  • Dynamic balancing of exploration and exploitation: the contingent benefits of ambidexterity
    Luger, J.; Raisch, S.; Schimmer, M.
  • Maier's law
    Maier, N.R.F.
  • Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning
    March, J.G.
  • Achieving contextual ambidexterity in R&D organizations: a management control system approach
    McCarthy, I.P.; Gordon, B.R.
  • Studying the accuracy of managers' perceptions: a research odyssey
    Mezias, J.M.; Starbuck, W.H.
  • Old is gold?: the value of temporal exploration in the creation of new knowledge
    Nerkar, A.
  • Organizational ambidexterity: past, present, and future
    O'Reilly, C.A.; Tushman, M.L.
  • Exploration and exploitation and firm performance variability: a study of ambidexterity in entrepreneurial firms
    Parida, V.; Lahti, T.; Wincent, J.
  • A joint analysis of determinants and performance consequences of ambidexterity
    Pertusa-Ortega, E.M.; Molina-Azorín, J.F.
  • Balanced structures: designing organizations for profitable growth
    Raisch, S.
  • Advancing the conceptualization and operationalization of novelty in organizational research
    Rosenkopf, L.; McGrath, P.
  • Ambidexterity in technology sourcing: the moderating role of absorptive capacity
    Rothaermel, F.T.; Alexandre, M.T.
  • Incumbent's advantage through exploiting complementary assets via interfirm cooperation
    Rothaermel, F.T.
  • Ambidextrous organizations: managing evolutionary and revolutionary change
    Tushman, M.L.; O'Reilly, C.A.
  • Exploration, exploitation, and financial performance: analysis of S and P 500 corporations
    Uotila, J.; Maula, M.; Keil, T.; Zahra, S.A.
  • Ambidexterity, external knowledge and performance in knowledge-intensive firms
    Vrontis, D.; Thrassou, A.; Santoro, G.; Papa, A.
  • Untangling the effects of overexploration and overexploitation on organizational performance: the moderating role of environmental dynamism
    Wang, H.; Li, J.
  • Revisiting james March (1991): whither exploration and exploitation?
    Wilden, R.; Hohberger, J.; Devinney, T.M.; Lavie, D.