Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(2013)
How science goes wrong
R. Reczek, Kelly Haws, Christopher Summers (2014)
Lucky Loyalty: The Effect of Consumer Effort on Predictions of Randomly Determined Marketing OutcomesJournal of Consumer Research, 41
W. Bennis, J. O'toole (2005)
How business schools lost their way.Harvard business review, 83 5
J. Pearce, Laura Huang (2012)
The decreasing value of our research to management educationAcademy of Management Learning and Education, 11
N. Kristof (2014)
Professors, we need you!New York Times
Stephen Brown, F. Webster, J. Steenkamp, W. Wilkie, J. Sheth, R. Sisodia, R. Kerin, D. Macinnis, L. McAlister, J. Raju, Ronald Bauerly, Don Johnson, Mandeep Singh, R. Staelin (2005)
Marketing Renaissance: Opportunities and Imperatives for Improving Marketing Thought, Practice, and InfrastructureJournal of Marketing, 69
(2018)
Changing the course of management development: combining excellence with relevance
David Ding, Julie Harrison (2005)
Guest editorialMetabolic Brain Disease, 3
D. Hambrick (1994)
1993 presidential address: What if the academy actually mattered?Academy of Management Review, 19
D. Lambert, M. Enz (2017)
Issues in Supply Chain Management: Progress and potentialIndustrial Marketing Management, 62
J. Goldstein (2017)
The research counts not the journal
D. Grant, G. Kovács, K. Spens (2018)
Questionable research practices in academia : antecedents and consequencesEuropean Business Review, 30
M. Enz, D. Lambert (2015)
Measuring the Financial Benefits of Cross‐Functional Integration Influences Management's BehaviorJournal of Business Logistics, 36
J. Mingers, H. Willmott (2010)
Performative effects of journal ranking lists
A. Hoffman (2016)
Reflections: Academia's Emerging Crisis of Relevance and the Consequent Role of the Engaged ScholarJournal of Change Management, 16
K. Storbacka (2014)
Does publish or perish lead to stylish rubbishJournal of Business Market Management, 7
M. Christopher, L. Ryals (2014)
The Supply Chain Becomes the Demand ChainJournal of Business Logistics, 35
M. Harmon (2006)
Business Research and Chinese Patriotic Poetry: How Competition for Status Distorts the Priority Between Research and Teaching in U.S. Business SchoolsAcademy of Management Learning and Education, 5
W. Starbuck (2005)
How Much Better are the Most Prestigious Journals? The Statistics of Academic PublicationSociology of Innovation eJournal
Vincent Dominé (2009)
The Buck Stops (and Starts) at Business SchoolHarvard Business Review, 87
(2018)
The moral dilemma of business research
W. Zinn, Thomas Goldsby (2014)
Logistics Professional Identity: Strengthening the Discipline as Galaxies CollideJournal of Business Logistics, 35
P. Nurse (2014)
There’s a lot of rubbish published in high-profile journals
A. Tsui (2013)
The Spirit of Science and Socially Responsible ScholarshipManagement and Organization Review, 9
Herman Aguinis, Debra Shapiro, E. Antonacopoulou, T. Cummings (2014)
Scholarly Impact: A Pluralist ConceptualizationAcademy of Management Learning and Education, 13
European Business Review, 30
D. Lambert, M. Enz (2012)
Managing and measuring value co-creation in business-to-business relationshipsJournal of Marketing Management, 28
Roger Martin (2012)
The Price of ActionabilityAcademy of Management Learning and Education, 11
Keith Crosier (2004)
How effectively do marketing journals transfer useful learning from scholars to practitionersMarketing Intelligence & Planning, 22
A. McKinnon (2013)
Starry‐eyed: journal rankings and the future of logistics researchInternational Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 43
(2019)
Management manifesto
D. Lambert, M. Enz (2015)
We Must Find the Courage to ChangeJournal of Business Logistics, 36
M. Alvesson, Yiannis Gabriel (2013)
Beyond Formulaic Research: In Praise of Greater Diversity in Organizational Research and PublicationsAcademy of Management Learning and Education, 12
Andrew Ven, Paul Johnson, Michael Beer, Art Brief, Tom Cummings, Ronald Giere, Edward Lawler, Wilfred Mijnhardt, Ian Mitroff, I. Nonaka, Andrew Pettigrew, Georges Romme, Vernon Ruttan, Sarah Rynes, Richard Swanson, D. Tranfield, J. Aken, M. Zald, Edward Zlotkowski
Knowledge for Theory and Practice
The purpose of this paper is to document the growing concerns about the lack of relevance of business school research, and offer suggestions for journal editors and faculty members in logistics and supply chain management.Design/methodology/approachThis paper is a review of literature related to the relevance of business school research and an analysis of trends related to the editorial review boards of the three main logistics journals.FindingsThe current business school research model is unsustainable. The metrics used are driving the wrong behavior. Logistics journals, traditionally known for an emphasis on practical relevance, appear to be emulating the journals of other business functions at a time when there is a growing consensus that these journals are publishing, more often than not, research of little or no value to practicing managers or society.Practical implicationsThe cost of faculty research at AACSB schools, which increasingly benefits no one but the authors, has been estimated at roughly US$3.8bn annually. Imagine the potential benefits if business school deans realigned the incentives to encourage faculty to produce credible research that is useful to business and society.Originality/valueThe hope is to influence senior logistics faculty with tenure to work with business executives or policymakers to identify long-term big idea projects that will impact business and society, and publish their research in the logistics journals. Traditionally, the editors of logistics journals included business executives on the editorial review boards and encouraged research of practical relevance. Journal editors should look back and realize what was good about the journals and not discard the good for current fads.
The International Journal of Logistics Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: May 15, 2019
Keywords: North America; Management research; Performance measurements; Conceptual research
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.