Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Reina Takamatsu (2020)
Striving to protect friends and family or holding everyone accountable: Moral expansiveness explains the difference between conservatives and liberalsCurrent Psychology
R. Belk (1996)
Metaphoric Relationships with PetsSociety & Animals, 4
Annie Chen, K. Hung, N. Peng (2012)
A cluster analysis examination of pet owners’ consumption values and behavior – segmenting owners strategicallyJournal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 20
Y.-F. Tuan (1984)
Dominance and Affection: The Making of Pets
D. Oyserman (2009)
Identity-based motivation: Implications for action-readiness, procedural-readiness, and consumer behaviorJournal of Consumer Psychology, 19
Unal Boya, M. Dotson, Eva Hyatt (2012)
Dimensions of the dog–human relationship: A segmentation approachJournal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 20
T.J. Kasperbauer (2017)
Subhuman: The Moral Psychology of Human Attitudes to Animals
M. Beverland, F. Farrelly, Elison Lim (2008)
Exploring the dark side of pet ownership: Status- and control-based pet consumptionJournal of Business Research, 61
Ünal Boya, M. Dotson, Eva Hyatt (2015)
A comparison of dog food choice criteria across dog owner segments: an exploratory studyInternational Journal of Consumer Studies, 39
Nancy Ridgway, Monika Kukar‐Kinney, K. Monroe, E. Chamberlin (2008)
Does excessive buying for self relate to spending on petsJournal of Business Research, 61
(2023)
Rich millennials are creating new status symbols as they start to buy homes and have kids. Here are 10 ways they are redefining luxury
Lan Xia, Wenting Zhong, J. Wang (2023)
To dress up or not: Political identity and dog owners' purchase of dog apparelsPsychology & Marketing
L. Cavanaugh, Hillary Leonard, D. Scammon (2008)
A Tail of Two Personalities: How Canine Companions Shape Relationships and Well-BeingMKTG: Personality & Individual Differences (Topic)
S. Gosling, Carson Sandy, J. Potter (2010)
Personalities of Self-Identified “Dog People” and “Cat People”Anthrozoös, 23
(2015)
Loved or owned: dogs, cats and psychological ownership
Henna Jyrinki (2012)
Pet‐related consumption as a consumer identity constructorInternational Journal of Consumer Studies, 36
A. Reed, M.R. Forehand, S. Puntoni, L. Warlop (2012)
Identity-based consumer behaviorInternational Journal of Research in Marketing, 29
(2022)
Pet market sales in the U.S. by category 2020. [online]
R. Belk (1988)
Possessions and the Extended SelfJournal of Consumer Research, 15
Shreyans Goenka, Manoj. Thomas (2018)
The Malleable Morality of Conspicuous ConsumptionERN: Other Microeconomics: Welfare Economics & Collective Decision-Making (Topic)
Christopher Federico, Christopher Weber, D. Ergun, Corrie Hunt (2013)
Mapping the Connections between Politics and Morality: The Multiple Sociopolitical Orientations Involved in Moral IntuitionPolitical Psychology, 34
Colleen Kirk (2019)
Dogs have masters, cats have staff: Consumers' psychological ownership and their economic valuation of petsJournal of Business Research
M. Hoffarth, Flávio Azevedo, J. Jost (2019)
Political conservatism and the exploitation of nonhuman animals: An application of system justification theoryGroup Processes & Intergroup Relations, 22
S. Zilcha-Mano, M. Mikulincer, P. Shaver (2011)
An attachment perspective on human–pet relationships: Conceptualization and assessment of pet attachment orientationsJournal of Research in Personality, 45
Catherine Amiot, B. Bastian (2015)
Toward a psychology of human-animal relations.Psychological bulletin, 141 1
Marina Puzakova, Hyokjin Kwak, Joseph Rocereto (2013)
When Humanizing Brands Goes Wrong: The Detrimental Effect of Brand Anthropomorphization amid Product WrongdoingsJournal of Marketing, 77
G. Brown, J. Pierce, C. Crossley (2014)
Toward an Understanding of the Development of Ownership FeelingsJournal of Organizational Behavior, 35
Joe Magee, A. Galinsky (2008)
8 Social Hierarchy: The Self‐Reinforcing Nature of Power and StatusThe Academy of Management Annals, 2
N. Wünderlich, Jill Mosteller, M. Beverland, H. Downey, K. Kraus, Meng-Hsien Lin, Henna Syrjälä (2021)
Animals in our Lives: An Interactive Well-Being PerspectiveJournal of Macromarketing, 41
Beverly Brockman, Valerie Taylor, Christopher Brockman (2008)
The price of unconditional love: Consumer decision making for high-dollar veterinary careJournal of Business Research, 61
J. Graham, Brian Nosek, J. Haidt (2012)
The Moral Stereotypes of Liberals and Conservatives: Exaggeration of Differences across the Political SpectrumPLoS ONE, 7
Julian Clair, M. Forehand (2020)
The Many-Faced Consumer: Consumption Consequences of Balancing Multiple IdentitiesJournal of Consumer Research, 46
J. Graham, J. Haidt, S. Koleva, Matt Motyl, Ravi Iyer, S. Wojcik, Peter Ditto (2012)
Moral Foundations Theory: The Pragmatic Validity of Moral Pluralism, 47
E. Wan, R. Chen (2020)
Anthropomorphism and object attachment.Current opinion in psychology, 39
J. Graham, Brian Nosek, J. Haidt, Ravi Iyer, Spassena Koleva, Peter Ditto (2011)
Mapping the moral domain.Journal of personality and social psychology, 101 2
A. Coleman (2023)
Why luxury for pets is a booming business
E. Hirschman (1994)
Consumers and Their Animal CompanionsJournal of Consumer Research, 20
M. Ellwood (2022)
Rich millennials are buying $152 poop-bag holders and $1,100 Hermès dog bowls as luxury brands bank on them spoiling their pets over having kids. [online]
A. Hiel, M. Kossowska, I. Mervielde (2000)
The relationship between Openness to Experience and political ideologyPersonality and Individual Differences, 28
M. Schaffer (2009)
One Nation under Dog: Adventures in the New World of Prozac-Popping Puppies, Dog-Park Politics, and Organic Pet Food
M. Holbrook, D. Stephens, Ellen Day, Sarah Holbrook, Gregor Strazar (2001)
A Collective Stereographic Photo Essay on Key Aspects of Animal Companionship: The Truth About Dogs and Cats
Rebekah Fox, N. Gee (2016)
Changing Conceptions of Care: Humanization of the Companion Animal–Human RelationshipSociety & Animals, 24
L. Litman, C. Rosenzweig, A. Moss (2020)
New solutions dramatically improve research data quality on MTurk. [online]
M. Dotson, Eva Hyatt (2008)
Understanding dog–human companionshipJournal of Business Research, 61
John Jost, B. Nosek, S. Gosling (2008)
Ideology: Its Resurgence in Social, Personality, and Political PsychologyPerspectives on Psychological Science, 3
D. Dubois, Nailya Ordabayeva (2016)
Social hierarchy, social status and status consumption
Vanessa Apaolaza, Patrick Hartmann, Mario Paredes, Alejandra Trujillo, Clare D'souza (2021)
What motivates consumers to buy fashion pet clothing? The role of attachment, pet anthropomorphism, and self-expansionJournal of Business Research
Nicholas Epley, A. Waytz, J. Cacioppo (2007)
On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism.Psychological review, 114 4
Jessica Greenebaum (2004)
It's a Dog's Life: Elevating Status from Pet to "Fur Baby" at Yappy HourSociety & Animals, 12
N. Bobbio (1996)
Left and Right: The Significance of a Political Distinction
Kristof Dhont, Gordon Hodson (2014)
Why do right-wing adherents engage in more animal exploitation and meat consumption?Personality and Individual Differences, 64
Marjorie Delbaere, Edward McQuarrie, Barbara Phillips (2011)
Personification in AdvertisingJournal of Advertising, 40
Matthias Fatke (2017)
Personality Traits and Political Ideology: A First Global AssessmentPolitical Psychology, 38
Kristof Dhont, Gordon Hodson, Ana Leite (2016)
Common Ideological Roots of Speciesism and Generalized Ethnic Prejudice: The Social Dominance Human–Animal Relations Model (SD–HARM)European Journal of Personality, 30
(2020)
America’s pet owners: including impact of COVID-19 US, October
Aaron Ahuvia (2008)
Commentary on exploring the dark side of pet ownership: Status- and control-based pet consumption: A reinterpretation of the dataJournal of Business Research, 61
A. Ksiazkiewicz, Steven Ludeke, R. Krueger (2016)
The Role of Cognitive Style in the Link Between Genes and Political IdeologyPolitical Psychology, 37
C. Huff, D. Tingley (2015)
“Who are these people?” Evaluating the demographic characteristics and political preferences of MTurk survey respondentsResearch & Politics, 2
D. Carney, J. Jost, S. Gosling, J. Potter (2008)
The Secret Lives of Liberals and Conservatives: Personality Profiles, Interaction Styles, and the Things They Leave BehindPolitical Psychology, 29
H. Gray, Kurt Gray, D. Wegner (2007)
Dimensions of Mind PerceptionScience, 315
Lucius Caviola, J. Everett, N. Faber (2019)
The Moral Standing of Animals: Towards a Psychology of SpeciesismJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116
Seung-Pyo Jun, H. Yoo, San Choi (2017)
Ten years of research change using Google Trends: From the perspective of big data utilizations and applicationsTechnological Forecasting and Social Change, 130
M. Butterfield, S. Hill, C. Lord (2012)
Mangy mutt or furry friend? Anthropomorphism promotes animal welfareJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48
Minori Arahori, H. Kuroshima, Y. Hori, Saho Takagi, Hitomi Chijiiwa, K. Fujita (2017)
Owners’ view of their pets’ emotions, intellect, and mutual relationship: Cats and dogs comparedBehavioural Processes, 141
Goitom Tesfom, N. Birch (2010)
Do they buy for their dogs the way they buy for themselvesPsychology & Marketing, 27
(2019)
America’s pet owners US, August
S. Coren, C. Coren (2019)
Dog ownership predicts voting behavior—cats do not|psychology today. [online]
J. Kim, Brian Park, D. Dubois (2018)
How Consumers' Political Ideology and Status-Maintenance Goals Interact to Shape Their Desire for Luxury GoodsJournal of Marketing
Jesse Graham, J. Haidt, B. Nosek (2009)
Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations.Journal of personality and social psychology, 96 5
E. Kylkilahti, Henna Syrjälä, J. Autio, Ari Kuismin, Minna Autio (2016)
Understanding co-consumption between consumers and their petsInternational Journal of Consumer Studies, 40
Beatrice Alba, N. Haslam (2015)
Dog People and Cat People Differ on Dominance-Related TraitsAnthrozoös, 28
Jihye Jung, Vikas Mittal (2020)
Political Identity and the Consumer Journey: A Research ReviewJournal of Retailing, 96
Daniel Crimston, M. Hornsey, P. Bain, B. Bastian (2018)
Toward a Psychology of Moral ExpansivenessCurrent Directions in Psychological Science, 27
Americus Reed, M. Forehand, S. Puntoni, L. Warlop (2012)
Identity-Based Consumer BehaviorEconometric Modeling: Microeconometric Models of Household Behavior eJournal
Scott Clifford, Ryan Jewell, Philip Waggoner (2015)
Are samples drawn from Mechanical Turk valid for research on political ideology?Research & Politics, 2
C. Heleski, A. Mertig, A. Zanella (2006)
Stakeholder attitudes toward farm animal welfareAnthrozoös, 19
Pets reflect the identity and moral values of their owners. The purpose of this study is to examine how pet owners’ political identity (liberal–conservative) influences the relationship they forge with their pets as well as their purchase behaviors of pet-related products and services.Design/methodology/approachThis study conducted two surveys of pet owners with different political identities and measured both their relationship with their pets and their purchase intentions of medical-related products and services as well as luxury accessories. Two secondary data sources were used to provide additional support.FindingsThis study shows that, on one hand, pet owners anthropomorphize their pets as if they were human equals. On the other hand, they consider themselves masters and emphasize control. The former aligns with the individualizing values endorsed by liberals, while the latter aligns with conservatives’ binding values. Reflecting their different values and owner-pet relationship characteristics, liberals and conservatives exhibit different purchase patterns. Liberals are more likely to buy medical-related products and services, while conservatives are more likely to buy branded luxury accessories for their pets.Research limitations/implicationsBoth primary studies are survey-based and data are correlational in nature. In addition, the samples are limited to the USA. While research suggests that the liberal-conservative continuum is universal, additional research is needed to generalize the findings to other countries.Practical implicationsUnderstanding the owner-dog relationship in the context of political identity and the effect of these relationships on dog owners' purchases offer interesting managerial implications in terms of product offerings, retail assortment decisions of related products and pet product branding.Originality/valueWhile dog ownership and related purchases are on the rise, research on owner-pet relationships is scant. This study provides theoretical contributions and implications by going beyond general relationship closeness and bringing in the role of owners’ (political) identity.
European Journal of Marketing – Emerald Publishing
Published: Nov 15, 2024
Keywords: Moral foundation theory; Political identity; Owner-pet relation; Pet products and services
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.