Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S.E. Cha, H. Moon, E. Kang (2018)
The progression of South Korea's childcare model. Care work and the economy
Ka Lin, Chack-kie Wong (2013)
Social policy and social order in East Asia: an evolutionary viewAsia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development, 23
Martin Powell, A. Barrientos (2004)
Welfare regimes and the welfare mixEuropean Journal of Political Research, 43
Heesuk Yun (2015)
The effects of expanded universal childcare support and working mothers in KoreaAsian Journal of Women's Studies, 21
J.E. Stiglitz, J.A. Ocampo, J.E. Stiglitz (2018)
The welfare state in the twenty-first centuryWelfare State Revisited
R. Chau, S. Yu (2012)
Defamilisation of Twenty-Two Countries: Its Implications for the Study of East Asian Welfare RegimeSocial Policy and Society, 12
G. Rodan, Kanishka Jayasuriya (2009)
Capitalist development, regime transitions and new forms of authoritarianism in AsiaThe Pacific Review, 22
A. Walker, C.K. Wong, A. Walker, C.K. Wong (2005)
Introduction: East Asian welfare regimeEast Asian Welfare Regime in Transition: From Confucianism and Globalization
J. Jo (2008)
Korea: Economic Development, Social Security and Productive Welfare
K. Mok, Stefan Kühner (2017)
Managing welfare expectations and social change: policy transfer in AsiaJournal of Asian Public Policy, 10
V. Hadiz, Angelos Chryssogelos (2017)
Populism in world politics: A comparative cross-regional perspectiveInternational Political Science Review, 38
M. Powell, Ki-tae Kim (2014)
The ‘Chameleon’ Korean Welfare RegimeSocial Policy & Administration, 48
Jae-jin Yang (2013)
Parochial Welfare Politics and the Small: Welfare State in South KoreaComparative politics, 45
I. Peng (2011)
The good, the bad and the confusing: the political economy of social care expansion in South Korea.Development and change, 42 4
Chris Holden (2018)
Global social policy: an application of welfare state theoryJournal of International and Comparative Social Policy, 34
Stefan Kühner (2015)
The productive and protective dimensions of welfare in Asia and the Pacific: pathways towards human development and income equality?Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy, 31
I. Holliday (2000)
Productivist Welfare Capitalism: Social Policy in East AsiaPolitical Studies, 48
P. Abrahamson (2017)
East Asian welfare regime: obsolete ideal-type or diversified realityJournal of Asian Public Policy, 10
Tauchid Yuda (2019)
The development of “Islamic welfare regime” in South East AsiaInternational Journal of Sociology and Social Policy
Margarita Estévez-Abe, Yeong-Soon Kim (2014)
Presidents, Prime Ministers and Politics of Care – Why Korea Expanded Childcare Much More than JapanSocial Policy & Administration, 48
N. Yeates (2001)
Globalization and Social PolicyGlobal Social Policy, 2
J. Murphy (2019)
The Historical Development of Indonesian Social SecurityAsian Journal of Social Science
E. Aspinall (2014)
Health care and democratization in IndonesiaDemocratization, 21
Hyun Choe, Ji-Young Kim (2012)
South Korea's democratization movements, 1980–1987: political structure, political opportunity, and framingInter-Asia Cultural Studies, 13
A. Kaasch (2013)
Contesting contestation: Global social policy prescriptions on pensions and health systemsGlobal Social Policy, 13
John Myles, J. Quadagno (2002)
Political Theories of the Welfare StateSocial Service Review, 76
I. Peng (2014)
The Social Protection Floor and the ‘New’ social investment policies in Japan and South KoreaGlobal Social Policy, 14
I. Ku (2007)
Social Welfare Reform Since the 1997 Economic Crisis in Korea: Achievement, Limits, and Future ProspectsAsian Social Work and Policy Review, 1
K. Mok, J. Hudson (2014)
Managing Social Change and Social Policy in Greater China: Welfare Regimes in Transition?Social Policy and Society, 13
E. Aspinall (2013)
The Triumph of Capital? Class Politics and Indonesian DemocratisationJournal of Contemporary Asia, 43
Jae-Hee Ahn, Nary Shin (2013)
The use of child care center for infants of dual-working families in Korea ☆☆ ☆☆☆Children and Youth Services Review, 35
T. Fleckenstein, Soohyung Lee (2017)
Democratization, post-industrialization, and East Asian welfare capitalism: the politics of welfare state reform in Japan, South Korea, and TaiwanJournal of International and Comparative Social Policy, 33
Dayoon Lee (2018)
The evolution of family policy in South Korea: From Confucian familism to Neo‐familismAsian Social Work and Policy Review, 12
Yanxia Zhang, W. Yeung (2012)
Shifting boundaries of care in Asia: an introductionInternational Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 32
Jooh Lee, Taekyoon Kim (2019)
Social Politics of Welfare Reform in Korea and Japan: A New Way of Mobilising Power ResourcesVOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 30
J. Stiglitz (2018)
1. The Welfare State in the Twenty-First CenturyThe Welfare State Revisited
Ricardo Leyer (2020)
Democracy and new ideas in Latin American social policy: the origins of conditional cash transfers in Brazil and MexicoJournal of International and Comparative Social Policy, 36
Alan Walker, Chack-kie Wong (2005)
East Asian welfare regimes in transition: From Confucianism to globalisation
G. Olsen, J. O'Connor, J. O'Connor, G. Olsen (1998)
Introduction understanding the welfare state: power resources theory and its criticsPower Resoruces Theory and the Welfare State. A Critical Approach
(2019)
GDP Growth (Annual %)
Kyung-sup Chang (2012)
Economic development, democracy and citizenship politics in South Korea: the predicament of developmental citizenshipCitizenship Studies, 16
(2007)
Development of social insurance in Korea and the role of trade union
Sean Vincent (2017)
Dominant Party Adaptation to the Catch-All Model: a Comparison of Former Dominant Parties in Japan and South KoreaEast Asia, 34
J. Minns (2001)
Of miracles and models: The rise and decline of the developmental state in South KoreaThird World Quarterly, 22
Won-sub Kim, Shih‐Jiunn Shi (2020)
East Asian approaches of activation: the politics of labor market policies in South Korea and TaiwanPolicy and Society, 39
Kim Young-khee, HanHyeon Sun (2003)
The Gwangju People's Uprising and the Construction of Collective Identity: A Study on the Fighters' BulletinNew Political Science, 25
Nan-joo Yang (2017)
East Asia in transition: re-examining the East Asian welfare model using fuzzy setsJournal of Asian Public Policy, 10
I. Peng (2012)
Social and political economy of care in Japan and South KoreaInternational Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 32
Sarah Cook, Huck-ju Kwon (2007)
Social Protection in East AsiaGlobal Social Policy, 7
Huck-ju Kwon (2017)
From the Developmental to the Universal Welfare State: Lost in Transition?
S. Baek, E. Sung, Sung Lee (2011)
The current coordinates of the Korean care regimeJournal of Comparative Social Welfare, 27
A. D’Costa (2018)
Capitalist Maturity and South Korea's Post‐Development ConundrumERN: Asia
Tauchid Yuda (2019)
Welfare regime and the patrimonial state in contemporary Asia: visiting Indonesian casesJournal of Asian Public Policy, 12
Yongho Chon (2014)
The Expansion of the Korean Welfare State and Its Results – Focusing on Long‐term Care Insurance for the ElderlySocial Policy & Administration, 48
V. Hadiz, R. Robison (2017)
Competing populisms in post-authoritarian IndonesiaInternational Political Science Review, 38
I. Gough, G. Wood, A. Barrientos, P. Bevan, P. Davis, Graham Room (2004)
Welfare regimes in development contexts: a global and regional analysis
Political analyses of the East Asian welfare state development often stress the importance of the power resource model, in which vibrant coalitions between the leftist party, interest groups, civil society and working-class unions have become driving factors in producing generous welfare outcomes. Challenging such analyses, this article discusses the convergence of the political attitude between political actors who are increasingly homogeneous (supportive) when it comes to the universal welfare state notion by focussing on childcare in South Korea.Design/methodology/approachBy using desk review of the peer-reviewed literature and reports, this article investigates the causation for why political parties with different political ideologies were keen on extending childcare programs and its outcome in addressing the existing demographic problems in Korea.FindingsAlthough the collective movement, especially in the 1990s and 2000s, had given important contributions to the early development of childcare in South Korea, more breakthroughs in childcare features were precisely and rapidly developed after politicians from different spectrums of political affiliations converged in their supportive attitude of the universal welfare. The driving factors of political convergence itself are not merely due to electoral competition or political activism; furthermore, it can be linked to the increased global institution involvement in domestic policy with extensive permeability, which, have ruined domestic policy development maintained for ideological reasoning and bring in more popular policy setting.Originality/valueThis article contributes to the growing literature on the political aspect of East Asian social policy studies, which goes beyond the traditional power resource analysis and makes a novel contribution to the childcare policy studies.
International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jun 24, 2020
Keywords: Childcare; Political convergence; East Asia; Power resources theory; South Korea; Welfare state
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.