Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(2011)
Census
R. Myers (1986)
Classical and modern regression with applications
Thorhildur Jetzek, M. Avital, N. Bjørn-Andersen (2014)
Generating Sustainable Value from Open Data in a Sharing Society
Tung-Mou Yang, J. Lo, Shiang Jing (2015)
To open or not to open? Determinants of open government dataJournal of Information Science, 41
A. Fernandes, Jhon Fresly (2017)
Modeling of role of public leader, open government information and public service performance in IndonesiaJournal of Management Development, 36
N. Huijboom, T. Broek (2011)
Open data: An International comparison of strategies, 12
Lisa Schmidthuber, D. Hilgers, Thomas Gegenhuber, Stefan Etzelstorfer (2017)
The emergence of local open government: Determinants of citizen participation in online service reportingGov. Inf. Q., 34
B. Wirtz, Peter Daiser, Marina Mermann (2018)
Social Media as a Leverage Strategy for Open Government: An Exploratory StudyInternational Journal of Public Administration, 41
Stuti Saxena, M. Janssen (2017)
Examining open government data (OGD) usage in India through UTAUT frameworkForesight, 19
O. Marjanovic, D. Cecez-Kecmanovic (2017)
Exploring the tension between transparency and datification effects of open government IS through the lens of Complex Adaptive SystemsJ. Strateg. Inf. Syst., 26
K. Janssen (2011)
The influence of the PSI directive on open government data: An overview of recent developmentsGov. Inf. Q., 28
M. Mpinganjira (2015)
Use of e-government services: the role of trustInternational Journal of Emerging Markets, 10
Bo Fan, Yupan Zhao (2017)
The moderating effect of external pressure on the relationship between internal organizational factors and the quality of open government dataGov. Inf. Q., 34
L. Velsen, T. Geest, M. Hedde, Wijnand Derks (2009)
Requirements engineering for e-Government services: A citizen-centric approach and case studyGov. Inf. Q., 26
S. Dawes, L. Bershadskaya, Olga Parkhimovich (2016)
Planning and designing open government data programs: An ecosystem approachGov. Inf. Q., 33
Anneke Zuiderwijk, M. Janssen, Yogesh Dwivedi (2015)
Acceptance and use predictors of open data technologies: Drawing upon the unified theory of acceptance and use of technologyGov. Inf. Q., 32
Erna Ruijer, S. Grimmelikhuijsen, M. Hogan, Sem Enzerink, A. Ojo, A. Meijer (2017)
Connecting societal issues, users and data. Scenario-based design of open data platformsGov. Inf. Q., 34
Neeta Verma, M. Gupta (2013)
Open government data: beyond policy & portal, a study in Indian contextProceedings of the 7th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance
A. Vetrò, L. Canova, Marco Torchiano, Camilo Minotas, R. Iemma, Federico Morando (2016)
Open data quality measurement framework: Definition and application to Open Government DataGov. Inf. Q., 33
P. Jaeger, J. Bertot, Katie Shilton (2012)
Information Policy and Social Media: Framing Government—Citizen Web 2.0 Interactions
D. Mason (2010)
Data Mining in Public and Private Sectors: Organizational and Government PerspectivesOnline Information Review, 34
K. Adu, Luyande Dube, E. Adjei (2016)
Digital preservation: The conduit through which open data, electronic government and the right to information are implementedLibr. Hi Tech, 34
Judie Attard, F. Orlandi, S. Scerri, S. Auer (2015)
A systematic review of open government data initiativesGov. Inf. Q., 32
A. Meijer, D. Curtin, M. Hillebrandt (2012)
Open government: connecting vision and voiceInternational Review of Administrative Sciences, 78
A. Veenstra, T. Broek (2013)
Opening Moves - Drivers, Enablers and Barriers of Open Data in a Semi-public Organization
José Gil-García, Soon Chun, M. Janssen (2009)
Government information sharing and integration: Combining the social and the technicalInf. Polity, 14
R. Klischewski, H. Scholl (2008)
Information quality as capstone in negotiating e-government integration, interoperation and information sharingElectron. Gov. an Int. J., 5
Anneke Zuiderwijk, M. Janssen (2014)
Open data policies, their implementation and impact: A framework for comparisonGov. Inf. Q., 31
Felipe Gonzalez-Zapata, Richard Heeks (2015)
The multiple meanings of open government data: Understanding different stakeholders and their perspectivesGov. Inf. Q., 32
C. Alexopoulos, E. Loukis, Y. Charalabidis (2014)
A Platform for Closing the Open Data Feedback Loop Based on Web2.0 FunctionalityJeDEM: eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government, 6
J. Bates (2014)
The strategic importance of information policy for the contemporary neoliberal state: The case of Open Government Data in the United KingdomGov. Inf. Q., 31
G. Craveiro, C. Albano (2017)
Open data intermediaries: coproduction in budget transparencyTransforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 11
S. Sadiq, M. Indulska (2017)
Open data: Quality over quantityInt. J. Inf. Manag., 37
Joel Thornton, E. Thornton (2013)
Assessing state government financial transparency websitesReference Services Review, 41
G. Oliveira, E. Welch (2013)
Social media use in local government: Linkage of technology, task, and organizational contextGov. Inf. Q., 30
Chris Martin (2014)
Barriers to the Open Government Data Agenda: Taking a Multi-Level PerspectivePolicy & Internet, 6
The paper aims to “re-use” the Open Government Data (OGD) published by the Election Commission of India (ECI). Bihar’s performance across General Elections, 2014, and Bihar Legislative Assembly Elections, 2015, is compared, wherein the role of contestants’ demographic profiles in determining their vote share is being investigated.Design/methodology/approachHypotheses are derived based on the impact of contestants’ demographic profiles (age, marital status, social category, political party affiliation, educational qualification, availing telephone and email facility, criminal antecedents) on their vote share. Following a quantitative approach, multiple regression and logistic regression are used to draw inferences from the data contestants’ affidavits – sourced from the ECI website.FindingsResults show that contestants’ demographic profiles impact their vote share in the elections. While the ECI website is a viable source for re-using the data available there, data are not available in a user-friendly format and this leads to difficulty in being re-used by different stakeholders.Originality/valueAcademic research on OGD re-use is negligible, and the present study seeks to contribute towards extant literature by underlining the significance of re-using OGD by drawing inferences from the data accessible via ECI.
foresight – Emerald Publishing
Published: Nov 14, 2018
Keywords: India; Elections; Open government data; Bihar; Re-use
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.