Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Z. Bauman (2008)
Does Ethics Have a Chance in a World of ConsumersEthics & International Affairs, 22
Maria Plakhotnik, Antonio Delgado (2008)
Book Review: Sen, A. (2006). Identity and Violence: The Illusion of Destiny. New York: NortonAdult Education Quarterly, 58
I. Young (2004)
Responsibility and Global Labor JusticeJournal of Political Philosophy, 12
Ashay Desai, T. Rittenburg (1997)
Global Ethics: An Integrative Framework For MNEsJournal of Business Ethics, 16
Tommy Jensen (2010)
Beyond Good and Evil: The Adiaphoric CompanyJournal of Business Ethics, 96
Tommy Jensen, J. Sandström, Sven Helin (2009)
Corporate Codes of Ethics and the Bending of Moral SpaceOrganization, 16
M. Djelic, Kerstin Sahlin-Andersson (2008)
Transnational Governance: Institutional Dynamics of Regulation
A. Mol (1999)
Ontological Politics. A Word and Some QuestionsThe Sociological Review, 47
P. Singer (2002)
One World: The Ethics of Globalization
U. Beck, Ciaran Cronin (2006)
The Cosmopolitan Vision
Z. Bauman (1998)
Globalization: The Human Consequences
Sven Helin, J. Sandström (2010)
Resisting a corporate code of ethics and the reinforcement of management controlOrganization Studies, 31
M. Castells (2000)
Materials for an exploratory theory of the network societyBritish Journal of Sociology, 51
J. Law (2004)
After Method: Mess in Social Science Research
Sven Helin, J. Sandström (2008)
Codes, Ethics and Cross-Cultural Differences: Stories from the Implementation of a Corporate Code of Ethics in a MNC SubsidiaryJournal of Business Ethics, 82
David Held, Anthony Mcgrew (2007)
Globalization Theory: Approaches and Controversies
R. Freeman (2000)
Business Ethics at the MillenniumBusiness Ethics Quarterly, 10
Campbell Jones, Martin Parker, R. Bos (2005)
For Business Ethics
R. Phillips, R. Freeman, A. Wicks (2003)
What Stakeholder Theory is NotBusiness Ethics Quarterly, 13
D. Dunphy, A. Griffiths, S. Benn (2002)
Organizational Change for Corporate Sustainability: A Guide for Leaders and Change Agents of the Future
M. Schwartz (2001)
The Nature of the Relationship between Corporate Codes of Ethics and BehaviourJournal of Business Ethics, 32
Barbara Czarniawska, Guje Sevón (1996)
Translating organizational changeAdministrative Science Quarterly, 44
P. Buller, John Kohls, K. Anderson (1991)
The challenge of global ethicsJournal of Business Ethics, 10
J. Walsh (2005)
Book Review Essay: Taking Stock of Stakeholder ManagementAcademy of Management Review, 30
S. Benhabib (2002)
The Claims of Culture: Equality and Diversity in the Global Era
(2008)
The Millennium Development Goals Report
H. Jonas (1985)
The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age
H. Jonas (1984)
The Imperative of Responsibility
A. Sen (2006)
Identity and Violence: The Illusion of Destiny
U. Beck, W. Bonss, C. Lau (2003)
The Theory of Reflexive ModernizationTheory, Culture & Society, 20
Purpose – Efforts to address the role and responsibilities of large global corporations have predominantly focused on the need for increased and more effective global corporate governance, but this underestimates the need to articulate a global ethics for these corporations. This paper aims to analyse the Woolf Committee Report (WCR; the weapon company BAE Systems plc's attempt to outline what it would take to become a global corporate leader in ethics) and benchmark it against an ethical response to corporate responsibility articulated as a global ethics. Design/methodology/approach – The paper is based on a textual analysis of the WCR. Findings – The WCR contains openings towards a re‐articulation of the role and responsibilities of large global corporations, but it is predominantly a text that gives us more clues to how difficult it will be for BAE, or any other corporation, to “live” a global ethics. Research limitations/implications – Critical analyses of the language that corporations use in order to address their role and responsibilities are important. However, how texts influence practice is dependent on how they travel and more studies on such journeys are also needed. Practical implications – Given that textual analyses, such as ours, are re‐connected to practitioners, such studies might contribute to making practitioners more discursively aware of the corporate talk that they are embedded in. Originality/value – The paper predominantly speaks to the field of business studies and its originality lies in its focus on a global ethics (without reducing this to governance) in relation to the role and responsibilities of large global corporations.
Journal of Global Responsibility – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jan 1, 2010
Keywords: Ethics; Globalization; Defence sector; Corporate social responsibility
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.