Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Rare instances of individuals with autism supporting or engaging in terrorism: a response to Lino Faccini and Clare Allely Nicholas Paul Chown, Luke Beardon and Kleio Cossburn The authors of the above article were careful, both in the title of their article, and in the main body text, to make it clear to readers that the involvement of persons with autism in terrorism is a rare occurrence. Our analysis of the case studies in the article suggests that concurrence of autism per se and terrorism may actually be even less than is implied by the authors. We felt compelled to write to you in view of the potential for autism to be wrongly associated with terrorism in the minds of the public despite attempts to ensure objectivity. In a journal with a focus on intellectual disability[1] (ID), the authors should make it clear that autism per se is not an ID. Where there is co-morbid ID in addition to autism, the situation is more complex and conclusions cannot be drawn so easily about autism (or ID). We believe that the following points support our view that the concurrence of autism and terrorism is likely to be significantly less than
Journal of Intellectual Disabilities and Offending Behaviour – Emerald Publishing
Published: Mar 12, 2018
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.