Questionable research practices when using confirmatory factor analysis

Questionable research practices when using confirmatory factor analysis PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to describe common questionable research practices (QRPs) engaged in by management researchers who use confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) as part of their analysis.Design/methodology/approachThe authors describe seven questionable analytic practices and then review one year of journal articles published in three top-tier management journals to estimate the base rate of these practices.FindingsThe authors find that CFA analyses are characterized by a high base rate of QRPs with one practice occurring for over 90 percent of all assessed articles.Research limitations/implicationsThe findings of this paper call into question the validity and trustworthiness of results reported in much of the management literature.Practical implicationsThe authors provide tentative guidelines of how editors and reviewers might reduce the degree to which the management literature is characterized by these QRPs.Originality/valueThis is the first paper to estimate the base rate of six QRPs relating to the widely used analytic tool referred to as CFA in the management literature. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Managerial Psychology Emerald Publishing

Questionable research practices when using confirmatory factor analysis

Journal of Managerial Psychology, Volume 34 (1): 13 – Feb 11, 2019

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/questionable-research-practices-when-using-confirmatory-factor-KMUPIQrX3A
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © Emerald Group Publishing Limited
ISSN
0268-3946
D.O.I.
10.1108/JMP-06-2018-0272
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to describe common questionable research practices (QRPs) engaged in by management researchers who use confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) as part of their analysis.Design/methodology/approachThe authors describe seven questionable analytic practices and then review one year of journal articles published in three top-tier management journals to estimate the base rate of these practices.FindingsThe authors find that CFA analyses are characterized by a high base rate of QRPs with one practice occurring for over 90 percent of all assessed articles.Research limitations/implicationsThe findings of this paper call into question the validity and trustworthiness of results reported in much of the management literature.Practical implicationsThe authors provide tentative guidelines of how editors and reviewers might reduce the degree to which the management literature is characterized by these QRPs.Originality/valueThis is the first paper to estimate the base rate of six QRPs relating to the widely used analytic tool referred to as CFA in the management literature.

Journal

Journal of Managerial PsychologyEmerald Publishing

Published: Feb 11, 2019

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create folders to
organize your research

Export folders, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off