Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Quality in museums and libraries: a comparison of indicators

Quality in museums and libraries: a comparison of indicators The purpose of this paper is to define quality criteria for museum work and try to identify indicators for assessing such quality, using the well-known quality indicators for libraries as basis of comparison.Design/methodology/approachIn 2016, the first international standard for museum statistics was published (ISO 18461). At the same time, the museum community realized the need to proceed from statistics to quality assessment in order to prove the effectiveness and efficiency of museum performance and finally also the influence of museums on society. The paper analyses the existing literature on museum quality and museum evaluation and compares the findings to the established methods in the library sector.FindingsComparison of quality criteria and quality evaluation in museums and libraries shows not only many similarities in what is regarded as quality, but also considerable differences in the options for assessment.Research limitations/implicationsThe paper shows a tentative selection of potential quality indicators and quality assessment methods for museums. Further work and practical expertise will be needed for developing and testing a reliable set of methods. The new ISO project 21246 key indicators for museums will further this development.Practical implicationsThere is an evident similarity in the mission and goals of cultural institutions such as archives, libraries and museums. Methods already in use in libraries for assessing performance quality and library impact can therefore also be useful in the museum sector. But the immense variety of museums requires an adaptation of existing methods and a number of new indicators especially devised for museum tasks.Originality/valueThe paper describes possible solutions for evaluating the quality of museums. As quality criteria are similar in museums and libraries, new quality indicators for museums may in turn become useful in the library sector. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Performance Measurement and Metrics Emerald Publishing

Quality in museums and libraries: a comparison of indicators

Poll, Roswitha
Performance Measurement and Metrics , Volume 19 (2): 11 – Aug 7, 2018
Download PDF
11 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/quality-in-museums-and-libraries-a-comparison-of-indicators-Q8f9nfV8X0
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
1467-8047
DOI
10.1108/pmm-10-2017-0049
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to define quality criteria for museum work and try to identify indicators for assessing such quality, using the well-known quality indicators for libraries as basis of comparison.Design/methodology/approachIn 2016, the first international standard for museum statistics was published (ISO 18461). At the same time, the museum community realized the need to proceed from statistics to quality assessment in order to prove the effectiveness and efficiency of museum performance and finally also the influence of museums on society. The paper analyses the existing literature on museum quality and museum evaluation and compares the findings to the established methods in the library sector.FindingsComparison of quality criteria and quality evaluation in museums and libraries shows not only many similarities in what is regarded as quality, but also considerable differences in the options for assessment.Research limitations/implicationsThe paper shows a tentative selection of potential quality indicators and quality assessment methods for museums. Further work and practical expertise will be needed for developing and testing a reliable set of methods. The new ISO project 21246 key indicators for museums will further this development.Practical implicationsThere is an evident similarity in the mission and goals of cultural institutions such as archives, libraries and museums. Methods already in use in libraries for assessing performance quality and library impact can therefore also be useful in the museum sector. But the immense variety of museums requires an adaptation of existing methods and a number of new indicators especially devised for museum tasks.Originality/valueThe paper describes possible solutions for evaluating the quality of museums. As quality criteria are similar in museums and libraries, new quality indicators for museums may in turn become useful in the library sector.

Journal

Performance Measurement and Metrics – Emerald Publishing

Published: Aug 7, 2018

Keywords: Quality; Assessment; Libraries; Performance indicators; Museums; ISO standards

References

  • Marketing in museums: means or master of the mission?
    Ames, P.
  • Breaking new ground: measuring museums’ merits
    Ames, P.
  • Evaluierung der Österreichischen Bundesmuseen
  • Sponsored museums: performance indicators 2013/14
  • Perspectives on outcome based evaluation for libraries and museums
  • Museum definition
  • Information and documentation – library performance indicators
  • Information and documentation – methods and procedures for assessing the impact of libraries
  • Information and documentation – international museum statistics
  • Information and documentation – international library statistics
  • Digest of statistics for museums, libraries and archives
  • Museumsregistrierung
  • National Standards for Australian Museums and Galleries, Version 1.5
  • Cultural value. User value of museums and galleries: a critical view of the literature
    Scott, C.; Dodd, J.; Sandell, R.
  • 2014-2015 iteration of the strategic plan 2011-2015
  • Performance indicators for museums: progress report from Wintergreen
    Weil, S.E.
  • Museum indicators of impact and performance 1.0