Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
T. Kwanya, C. Stilwell, P. Underwood (2012)
Library 2.0 versus other library service models: A critical analysisJournal of Librarianship and Information Science, 44
(2016)
National library of Scotland | Facebook
Journal of Strategic Marketing, 25
J. Peachey (2017)
Shining a light: how people in the UK and Ireland use public libraries and what they think of them
D. Becker, Ingrid Bonadie-Joseph, J. Cain (2013)
Developing and completing a library mobile technology survey to create a user-centered mobile presenceLibr. Hi Tech, 31
(2015)
Cell phones in Africa: communication lifeline
Jack Maness (2006)
Library 2.0 Theory: Web 2.0 and Its Implications for LibrariesWebology, 3
New Library World, 115
(2016)
Mid-2015 population estimates Scotland and corrected population estimates for mid-2012, mid-2013 and mid-2014
T. Ballard, Anna Blaine (2013)
A library in the palm of your handNew Library World, 114
Xinya Yang, Qunyi Wei, Xiao-dong Peng (2009)
System architecture of Library 2.0Electron. Libr., 27
J. Calacanis (2016)
Web 3.0, the ‘official’ definition
Adam Craig (2012)
The academy goes mobile: an overview of mobile applications in higher education
(2016)
Scotland becomes a ‘smartphone society’
CILIP Update
(2007)
The Mann ‐ Whitney U: A Test for Assessing Whether Two Independent Samples Come from the Same Distribution
P. Walia, Monika Gupta (2012)
Application of web 2.0 tools by national librariesWebology, 9
Younghee Noh (2013)
A study on next-generation digital library using context-awareness technologyLibr. Hi Tech, 31
S. Gibbs (2015)
Iris-scanning smartphone puts paid to passwords in blink of an eye
Yan Liu, Sarah Briggs (2015)
A Library in the Palm of Your Hand: Mobile Services in Top 100 University LibrariesInformation Technology and Libraries, 34
H. Hsieh, S. Shannon (2005)
Three Approaches to Qualitative Content AnalysisQualitative Health Research, 15
E. Spence (2014)
The mobile browser is dead, long live the appForbes
(2016)
The British library
Kathryn Kane, Janine Robinson‐Combre, Z. Berge (2010)
Tapping into social networkingVine, 40
David Fiander (2012)
Social media for academic libraries
Graham Martindale, P. Willett, Roger Jones (2015)
Use and perceptions of e-books in Derbyshire librariesLibrary Review, 64
Tien-Chi Huang (2015)
What Library 2.0 has taught libraries in Taiwan about e-learningElectron. Libr., 33
Robin Canuel, Chad Crichton (2015)
Leveraging apps for research and learning: a survey of Canadian academic librariesLibr. Hi Tech, 33
S. Sofaer (1999)
Qualitative methods: what are they and why use them?Health services research, 34 5 Pt 2
Amit Kumar (2014)
Students opinion about the success of mobile technology in librariesNew Library World, 115
(2013)
W3C semantic web activity homepage
(2016)
Annual report 2015/16
N. Merrett (2016)
26 Scottish authorities back shared chief digital officer plan – government computing network
K. Mills (2009)
M-libraries: information on the move
L. Barkhuus, V. Polichar (2011)
Empowerment through seamfulness: smart phones in everyday lifePersonal and Ubiquitous Computing, 15
S.K. Chauhan (2009)
Library 3.0
(2016)
Blog | glasgow women’s library
(1999)
Resource description framework (RDF) model and syntax specification
Rafael Bravo, Jorge Matute, J. Pina (2017)
Corporate identity management and employees’ responsesJournal of Strategic Marketing, 25
I. Ong, C. Goh, L. Chua, P. Pak (2014)
Empowering the library patron: the public libraries of Singapore’s experience with transactional services delivered through a mobile application
The purpose of this paper is to examine current public library apps in Scotland and assess Scottish public library users’ opinions of those apps.Design/methodology/approachTwo qualitative and quantitative surveys were conducted. One survey was distributed to each Scottish local authority, the entities responsible for public libraries and Scotland. The second survey was made available to the public. The results were analysed with nonparametric statistics and content analysis.FindingsAll 32 authorities responded. In all, 17 authorities had an app, two had one in development, and 13 had none. Offering an alternative means of communication to patrons was the main reason for providing an app, while cost and low priority were the main reasons provided against app provision. Authorities were satisfied with the core services offered in their apps, but less so with others. No authorities had consulted the public regarding app provision. The public (n=185), while satisfied with current library apps, criticised the complex procedures required to access external services. Patrons from authorities without an app stated interest in apps.Research limitations/implicationsIt is vital for public libraries to implement at least core services that are optimised for mobile devices. They should consult with the public before and throughout the development process to ensure they are happy with the implementation.Originality/valueThis is the first known study to explore public library app use in Scotland as well as one of the first in public library app use worldwide.
Library Hi Tech – Emerald Publishing
Published: May 9, 2018
Keywords: Public libraries; Computer applications; Questionnaires; Scotland; Software development; Mobile applications
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.