Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
C. Driscoll, M. Starik (2004)
The Primordial Stakeholder: Advancing the Conceptual Consideration of Stakeholder Status for the Natural EnvironmentJournal of Business Ethics, 49
M. Engwall (2003)
No project is an island: linking projects to history and contextResearch Policy, 32
Hans Rämö (2002)
Doing things right and doing the right things Time and timing in projectsInternational Journal of Project Management, 20
R. Newcombe (2003)
From client to project stakeholders: a stakeholder mapping approachConstruction Management and Economics, 21
S. Norton (2007)
The Natural Environment as a Salient Stakeholder: Non-Anthropocentrism, Ecosystem Stability and the Financial MarketsWiley-Blackwell: Business Ethics: A European Review
B. Latour (1991)
We Have Never Been Modern
Tommy Jensen, J. Sandström (2011)
Stakeholder Theory and Globalization: The Challenges of Power and ResponsibilityOrganization Studies, 32
A. Blok (2011)
War of the Whales: Post-Sovereign Science and Agonistic Cosmopolitics in Japanese-Global Whaling AssemblagesScience, Technology, & Human Values, 36
J. Söderlund (2002)
Managing Complex Development Projects: Arenas, Knowledge Processes and TimeR & D Management, 32
(2002)
Morality and technology – the end of the means
Oliver Ibert (2004)
Projects and firms as discordant complements: organisational learning in the Munich software ecologyResearch Policy, 33
M. Callon, J. Law (1982)
On Interests and their Transformation: Enrolment and Counter-EnrolmentSocial Studies of Science, 12
G. Isabeau (2010)
“Stakeholder Theory and “The Corporate Objective Revisited““, ...
Satu Reijonen, Kjell Tryggestad (2012)
The dynamic signification of product qualities: on the possibility of “greening” marketsConsumption Markets & Culture, 15
Barbara Czarniawska (2009)
Commentary: STS Meets MOSOrganization, 16
(1991)
Projektledelse i løst koblede systemer – ledelse og læring i en ufuldkommen verden, Jurist – og Økonomforbundets Forlag, København
Nardia Haigh, A. Griffiths (2009)
The natural environment as a primary stakeholder: the case of climate changeBusiness Strategy and The Environment, 18
Barbara Czarniawska (1998)
A Narrative Approach to Organization Studies
M. Akrich, M. Callon, B. Latour, A. Monaghan (2002)
The Key to Success in Innovation * Part I: the Art of Interessement
Albena Yaneva (2008)
How Buildings 'Surprise': The Renovation of the Alte Aula in ViennaScience and technology studies, 28
B. Latour (1988)
The pasteurization of France
M. Callon (1984)
Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc BayThe Sociological Review, 32
J. Whyte, B. Ewenstein, M. Hales, J. Tidd (2007)
Visual practices and the objects used in designBuilding Research & Information, 35
S. Hinchliffe, M. Kearnes, M. Degen, S. Whatmore (2005)
Urban Wild Things: A Cosmopolitical ExperimentEnvironment and Planning D: Society and Space, 23
H. Kjellberg (2010)
Struggling to perform a warehouse: buildings as symbols and toolsConstruction Management and Economics, 28
T. Hernes (2010)
Actor-Network Theory, Callon's Scallops and Process-Based Organization Studies
C. Thompson
When elephants stand for competing philosophies of nature: Ambroseli National Park, Kenya
B. Latour
Science in Action
T. Donaldson, L. Preston (1995)
The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and ImplicationsAcademy of Management Review, 20
(2010)
What We Talk About When We Talk About Space: End User Participation Between Processes of Organizational and Architectural Design, Copenhagen Business School, Copenhagen
M. Starik (1995)
Should trees have managerial standing? Toward stakeholder status for non-human natureJournal of Business Ethics, 14
H. Maylor
Project Management
Allen Bluedorn (2002)
The Human Organization of Time: Temporal Realities and Experience
Barbara Czarniawska, B. Joerges (1996)
Travels of ideas.
J. Law, A. Mol (2008)
The Actor-Enacted: Cumbrian Sheep in 2001
Susse Georg, Kjell Tryggestad (2009)
On the emergence of roles in construction: the qualculative role of project managementConstruction Management and Economics, 27
G. Burrell
Back to the future: time and organization
R. Bakker (2010)
Taking Stock of Temporary Organizational Forms: A Systematic Review and Research AgendaOrganizations & Markets: Formal & Informal Structures eJournal
Albena Yaneva (2005)
Scaling Up and DownSocial Studies of Science, 35
M. Våland
What We Talk About When We Talk About Space: End User Participation Between Processes of Organizational and Architectural Design
Vinciane Despret (2006)
Sheep do have Opinions
M. Hatch (2002)
Essai: Doing Time in Organization TheoryOrganization Studies, 23
B. Latour, P. Weibel (2005)
Making Things Public. Atmospheres of Democracy Karlsruhe and Cambridge, MA: ZKM, Center for Art and Media
A. Pedersen (2009)
Moving Away from Chronological Time: Introducing the Shadows of Time and Chronotopes as New Understandings of `Narrative Time'Organization, 16
C. Harty (2008)
Implementing innovation in construction: contexts, relative boundedness and actor‐network theoryConstruction Management and Economics, 26
A. Yaneva
Scaling up and down: extraction trials in architectural design
Petter Holm, K. Nielsen (2007)
Framing Fish, Making Markets: The Construction of Individual Transferable Quotas (ITQs)The Sociological Review, 55
Bruno Latour (1989)
Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through societyContemporary Sociology, 18
J. Law, G. Fyfe, M. Callon, B. Latour, S. Rayner (1986)
Power, Action and Belief. A New Sociology of Knowledge?
Johann Packendorff (1995)
INQUIRING INTO THE TEMPORARY ORGANIZATION: NEW DIRECTIONS FOR PROJECT MANAGEMENT RESEARCHScandinavian Journal of Management, 11
O. Ibert
Projects and firms as discordant complements
C. Harty (2005)
Innovation in construction: a sociology of technology approachBuilding Research & Information, 33
(2005)
Reassembling the Social
R. Lundin, Anders Söderholm (1995)
A theory of the temporary organizationScandinavian Journal of Management, 11
Kristian Kreiner (1995)
In search of relevance: Project management in drifting environmentsScandinavian Journal of Management, 11
R. Phillips, Joel Reichart (2005)
The Environment as a Stakeholder? A Fairness-Based ApproachJournal of Business Ethics, 23
A. Whittle, Olga Suhomlinova, F. Mueller (2010)
Funnel of Interests: The Discursive Translation of Organizational ChangeThe Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 46
Y. Fassin (2009)
The Stakeholder Model RefinedJournal of Business Ethics, 84
R. Freeman (2010)
Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach
D. Sage, A. Dainty, N. Brookes (2011)
How actor‐network theories can help in understanding project complexitiesInternational Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 4
S. Christensen, K. Kreiner
Projektledelse i løst koblede systemer – ledelse og læring i en ufuldkommen verden
S. Gherardi, Davide Nicolini (2002)
Learning the Trade: A Culture of Safety in PracticeOrganization, 9
Kjell Tryggestad, Susse Georg, T. Hernes (2010)
Constructing buildings and design ambitionsConstruction Management and Economics, 28
P. Kenis, M. Janowicz-Panjaitan, B. Cambré (2009)
Temporary organizations: Prevalence, logic and effectiveness
K. Cetina, A. Cicourel (2014)
Unscrewing the big Leviathan: how actors macro- structure reality and how sociologists help them to do so
N. Roe (1992)
The politics of nature
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore how animals can become stakeholders in interaction with project management technologies and what happens with project temporalities when new and surprising stakeholders become part of a project and a recognized matter of concern to be taken into account. Design/methodology/approach – The paper is based on a qualitative case study of a project in the building industry. The authors use actor‐network theory (ANT) to analyze the emergence of animal stakeholders, stakes and temporalities. Findings – The study shows how project temporalities can multiply in interaction with project management technologies and how conventional linear conceptions of project time may be contested with the emergence of new non‐human stakeholders and temporalities. Research limitations/implications – The study draws on ANT to show how animals can become stakeholders during the project. Other approaches to animal stakeholders may provide other valuable insights. Practical implications – Rather than taking the linear time conception for granted, the management challenge and practical implication is to re‐conceptualize time by taking heterogeneous temporalities into account. This may require investments in new project management technologies. Originality/value – This paper adds to the literatures on project temporalities and stakeholder theory by connecting them to the question of non‐human stakeholders and to project management technologies.
International Journal of Managing Projects in Business – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jan 18, 2013
Keywords: Stakeholders; Animals; Project management; Construction industry; Actor‐network theory; Stakeholder theory; Stakes; Nature; Project temporalities
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.