Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Anita Bernstein (1997)
Treating Sexual Harassment with RespectHarvard Law Review, 111
Elizabeth Shoenfelt, Allison Maue, Joanne Nelson (2002)
Reasonable Person versus Reasonable Woman: Does It Matter?The American University journal of gender, social policy & the law, 10
D. Curtin (1994)
Case C-271/91, Marshall v. Southampton and South West Hampshire Area Health Authority, [“Marshall II”], Judgment of 2 August 1993.Common Market Law Review
Ursula Kubal (1999)
U.S. Multinational Corporations Abroad: A Comparative Perspective on Sex Discrimination Law in the United States and the European UnionNorth Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation, 25
Brian Kruse (1999)
Strike One—You're Out! Cautious Employers Lose under New Sexual Harassment Law: Faragher v. City of Boca Raton , 118 S. Ct. 2275 (1998)Nebraska law review, 78
Maria Rotundo, Dung-Hanh Nguyen, P. Sackett (2001)
A meta-analytic review of gender differences in perceptions of sexual harassment.The Journal of applied psychology, 86 5
R. Wiener, L. Hurt (1997)
Social Sexual Conduct at Work: How Do Workers Know When it is Harassment and When it is Not?California western law review, 34
R. Wiener, L. Hurt, B. Russell, Kelley Mannen, Charles Gasper (1997)
Perceptions of Sexual Harassment: The Effects of Gender, Legal Standard, and Ambivalent SexismLaw and Human Behavior, 21
Mary Tsekos (2003)
The New European Union Directive on Sexual Harassment andIts Implications for GreeceTHE HUMAN RIGHTS BRIEF, 10
J. Grossman (2003)
The Culture of Compliance: The Final Triumph of Form over Substance in Sexual Harassment Law, 26
Kathryn Abrams (1997)
New Jurisprudence of Sexual HarassmentCornell Law Review, 83
R. Hogler, Jennifer Frame, G. Thornton (2002)
Workplace Sexual Harassment Law: An Empirical Analysis of Organizational Justice and Legal PolicyJournal of Managerial Issues, 14
Michele Gee, S. Norton (1999)
The confluence of gender and culture: sexual harassment in the international arenaManagement Decision, 37
B. Gutek, M. O'Connor, Renée Melançon, Margaret Stockdale, Tracey Geer, R. Done (1999)
The utility of the reasonable woman legal standard in hostile environment sexual harassment cases: A multimethod, multistudy examination.Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 5
Mitchell Frank (2002)
The Social Context Variable in Hostile Environment LitigationNotre Dame Law Review, 77
Anita Bernstein (1994)
Law, Culture, and HarassmentUniversity of Pennsylvania Law Review, 142
Victoria Carter (1992)
Working on Dignity: EC Initiatives on Sexual Harrassment in the WorkplaceNorthwestern journal of international law and business, 12
Ramona Paetzold, Bill Shaw (1994)
A postmodern feminist view of “reasonableness” in hostile environment sexual harassmentJournal of Business Ethics, 13
J. Morgan, G. Gomes, J. Owens (2000)
THE UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES OF OUTSOURCING SEXUAL HARASSMENT INVESTIGATIONSJournal of Individual Employment Rights, 9
Beverley Earle, G. Madek (1994)
An International Perspective on Sexual Harassment LawLaw and Inequality, 12
R. Brooks (1999)
Dignity and Discrimination: Toward a Pluralistic Understanding of Workplace Harassment
Gabrielle Friedman, James Whitman (2003)
The European Transformation of Harassment Law: Discrimination versus Dignity
Eric Gippini-Fournier (1998)
Case Law a. Court of JusticeCommon Market Law Review
G. Timmerman, C. Bajema (1999)
Sexual Harassment in Northwest EuropeEuropean Journal of Women's Studies, 6
J. Sigal, H. Jacobsen (1999)
A cross-cultural exploration of factors affecting reactions to sexual harassment: Attitudes and policies.Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 5
European Union policymakers have taken a courageous step toward outlawing sexual harassment as a form of gender‐based discrimination throughout the EU with the recent passage of the amended equal treatment directive. While the edict seeks to harmonize member states' laws regarding the equal participation of men and women in the labor market, a number of public policy issues will arise as individual member states formally implement the directive. This article begins by identifying the principal components of the directive. It then focuses on two likely areas of intense public policy debate: operationalizing the definition of “sexual harassment,” and protecting employers from liability under certain circumstances. Where appropriate, the article draws upon corollaries and parallels in US law that may provide guidance to policy makers on these issues. The article concludes by offering practical suggestions for employers who would like to take the initiative in creating workplace reforms consistent with the principles underlying the directive.
Employee Relations: An International Journal – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jun 1, 2004
Keywords: Sexual harassment; Public policy; Employment legislation; European Union
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.