Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/emerald-publishing/progressing-the-rights-to-light-debate-part-1-a-review-of-current-0JQRb1ug4h
References (23)
-
J. Jolowicz (1975)
Damages in Equity—A Study of Lord Cairns' ActThe Cambridge Law Journal, 34
-
(1995)
The Valuation of Rights to Light' Structural Survey -
(1979)
Prescription Act 1832, s. 3. 3 Colls v Home and Colonial Stores Ltd [1904] AC 179 -
(1923)
Window Design and the Measurement and Predetermination of Daylight Illumination -
(1988)
Rights of light and how to deal with them -
J. Walsh (1961)
The science of daylight -
P. Chynoweth (2005)
Progressing the rights to light debate: Part 2: the grumble point revisitedStructural Survey, 23
-
(1989)
Rights to Light, Estates Gazette -
(1909)
The Measurement of Illumination; Daylight & Artificial: With Special Reference to Ancient Light Disputes -
J. join, T. Street
Foundations of Legal LiabilityYale Law Journal, 16
-
(1992)
Lighting for Buildings -Part 2: Code of Practice for Daylighting (BS 8206-21992), BSI -
(1997)
Sharing the Right to Light -
P. Ellis (1989)
Rights to Light -
(1981)
The Valuation of Rights to Light (Property Valuation Handbook Section B4 -
B. Duval (2001)
Commission internationale de l’éclairage (CIE)Optique Photonique
-
M. Pitts (2000)
The grumble point: is it still worth the candle?Structural Survey, 18
-
(1996)
Light Relief', Property Week -
(1981)
The Valuation of Rights to Light (Property Valuation Handbook Section B4) College of Estate Management -
(1923)
Window Design and the Measurement and Predetermination of Daylight Illumination', The Illuminating Engineer -
(1931)
Recueil des Travaux et Compte Rendu des Seances, Huitieme Session -
J. Gaunt, C. Gale, P. Morgan, Spencer Maurice (1986)
Gale on easements -
(1928)
Daylight and Public Health -
(1995)
The Valuation of Rights to Light
- Publisher
- Emerald Publishing
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2004 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
- ISSN
- 0263-080X
- DOI
- 10.1108/02630800410549026
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
This study introduces a series of articles which respond to Pitts' call for a debate into current rights to light practice. It summarises relevant areas of law as well as current measurement and valuation practices in this area. Describes the Waldram methodology, grumble point, fifty‐fifty rule and the concept of equivalent first zone loss. It also shows how these concepts are used to determine the amount of damages payable where a right to light has been infringed and calls for others to contribute to the debate proposed by Pitts.
Journal
Structural Survey – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jul 1, 2004
Keywords: Buildings; Light; Compensation; Grievances