Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
T. Dogaru (2014)
The National Policy-making Process in the Context of the International Economic and Financial Movements☆Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 143
J. Maxwell, Margaret Chmiel (2015)
Qualitative Research Design
Aleksandras Patapas, Alvydas Raipa, Vainius Smalskys (2014)
New Public Governance: The Tracks of ChangesInternational journal of business and social research, 4
(2003)
Parliament of Romania
(2003)
Alcuni chiarimenti sul semiprezidenzialismo. Studia politica
Esther Quevedo‐Puente, José Díez-Esteban (2013)
The Impact of Corporate Reputation on Firm Risk: A Panel Data Analysis of Spanish Quoted FirmsERN: Other IO: Empirical Studies of Firms & Markets (Topic)
Theoretical and Applied Economics, 18
(2017)
Worldwide Governance Indicators 2017
V. Pestoff (2011)
Co-production, new public governance and third sector social services in EuropeCiências Sociais Unisinos, 47
Alexander Henderson, T. Ţiclău, Dan Balica (2018)
Perceptions of Discretion in Street-Level Public Service: Examining Administrative Governance in RomaniaPublic Performance & Management Review, 41
(2016)
Policy performance and governance capacities in the OECD and EU. Sustainable governance indicators
(2017)
Bribery & corruption 2017
H. Rittel, M. Webber (1973)
Dilemmas in a general theory of planningPolicy Sciences, 4
Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 81
V. Pestoff (2006)
Citizens and co-production of welfare servicesPublic Management Review, 8
Sergiu Gherghina (2014)
The Threat of Diversity? Explaining Attitudes towards Ethnic Conflict in RomaniaComparative Southeast European Studies, 62
Veerle Doeveren (2011)
Rethinking Good GovernancePublic Integrity, 13
T. Weiss (2000)
Governance, good governance and global governance: Conceptual and actual challengesThird World Quarterly, 21
Social Sciences Unisions, 47
(2010-2016)
European commission reports from the commission to the European parliament and the council on progress in Romania under the Cooperation and Verification Mechanism
G. Bouckaert, B. Peters, K. Verhoest (2010)
The Coordination of Public Sector Organizations
(2002)
Stability pact anti-corruption initiative. Anti-corruption measures in South Eastern Europe: civil society’s involvement
S. Osborne, Kirsty Strokosch (2013)
It Takes Two to Tango? Understanding the Co‐Production of Public Services by Integrating the Services Management and Public Administration PerspectivesInternational Management of Organizations & People eJournal
J. Hartley (2018)
Ten propositions about public leadershipInternational Journal of Public Leadership
Runya Xu, Q. Sun, Wei Si (2015)
The Third Wave of Public Administration: The New Public GovernanceCanadian Social Science, 11
(2018)
IMF country report Romania
(2018)
Corruption Perceptions Index 2016
L. Reid (2014)
Adding value through new public leadershipThe International Journal of Leadership in Public Services, 10
(2018)
Worldwide Governance Indicators
C. Anderson (2010)
Presenting and Evaluating Qualitative ResearchAmerican Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 74
D. Kaufmann (2000)
Governance matters: from measurement to action
(2008)
Measuring regulatory quality
C.E. Hintea (2011)
Reform and management in Romania. Strategy and structural change
Ani Matei, T. Dogaru (2012)
Coordination of Public Policies in Romania: An Empirical AnalysisPublic Choice: Analysis of Collective Decision-Making eJournal
Ani Matei, T. Dogaru (2011)
The Reform of the National Public Policies Process Under the Influence of Europeanization Changes in the Policy-Making in Romania on Institutional and Legislative LevelPolitical Institutions: Legislatures eJournal
S. Osborne (2006)
The New Public Governance? 1Public Management Review, 8
(2018)
Republic of Croatia: Selected Issues
(2016)
Council recommendation on the 2016 National Reform Program of Romania and delivering a council opinion on the 2016 convergence program of Romania
(2016)
Report from the commission to the European parliament and the Council on Progress in Romania under the Co-operation and Verification Mechanism
S. Osborne (2010)
The new public governance? : emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance
E. Klijn (2008)
Governance and Governance Networks in EuropePublic Management Review, 10
(2001)
Free access to public interest information
New Public Governance is becoming an important framework for managing the public sector in the era of collaborative governance. The purpose of this paper is to explore the extent to which New Public Governance as a framework is limited to the political and administrative context of Romania and to create a connection between good governance and New Public Governance through operationalizing the concepts and clarifying their inter-dependency. New public leadership skills are required from both horizontal and vertical approaches, in order to tackle the country’s wicked problems.Design/methodology/approachThrough the use of qualitative methods, such as document analysis of Cooperation and Verification Mechanism reports of the European Commission on Romania, and expert interviews with a focus on governance aspects, the paper seeks to clarify the challenges that Romania faces in terms of democratization given the current political and administrative context.FindingsFindings in Romania reveal little agreement on progress in government effectiveness, regulatory quality and implementation of the rule of law. However, progress has been noted on voice and accountability and strengthening democracy.Research limitations/implicationsThe authors discuss the uncertainty that the concept of good governance has created from an international organizations’ perspective in developing countries, and define the good governance infrastructure as a means of bringing governance closer to the complex and changing context of each country. The paper aims to clarify the connection between good governance and New Public Governance, by assessing contextual factors in developing countries.Practical implicationsThe practical implications of the study are related to the possibility of this paper to inform other developing countries on the conditions that are necessary in order to adhere to New Public Governance. The paper has implications in proposing the use of the good governance infrastructure as a helpful concept when considering democratic frameworks for research and practice.Social implicationsThe social implications of this paper are connected to the current political, administrative and social context of the Central and Eastern European region and its component countries. Improving democratic practices, through advancing the importance of good governance indicators in switching to a public governance perspective in public administration, is the main outcome of New Public Governance-style reforms.Originality/valueThe paper’s originality stands in designing the premises for the “good governance infrastructure” as a new concept that aims to bridge the gap between good governance and New Public Governance, and bring more conceptual clarity. Being supported by evidence, through the use of primary data generated by expert interview analysis, the new concept can improve and encourage further research on this topic.
International Journal of Public Leadership – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jul 23, 2019
Keywords: Romania; New Public Governance; Good governance infrastructure; Good governance principles
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.