Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Process performance indicators in redesigning the patient care process

Process performance indicators in redesigning the patient care process Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate the regulator's attempt at redesigning the patient care process (PCP) – a core business process in public hospitals – by introducing dichotomous process performance indicators as an innovative management tool intended to align the State health care policy with the everyday management of operations at a hospital ward. Design/methodology/approach – The paper presents an ethnographic case study of redesigning the PCP according to the strategy originating outside the organization. The study employs competing theories that represent alternative epistemological and ontological views of the world in order to produce a tentative explanation of why the intended redesign of the PCP has not fully eventuated. Observational data and opportunistic interviewing are used to answer the research question of whether and how the information and operational flows on the ward were affected by introduction of process performance indicators. A business process redesign framework was employed for data analysis since it better reflects the objectives of the State‐wide initiative and offers a convenient tool in dealing with data complexity. Findings – Introduction of the process performance indicators did not result in redesigning of the PCP as intended by health care authorities. Out of four process performance indicators, only one was consistently implemented, which merely produced a duplication of the previously collected information, therefore adding no value to the PCP. On a theoretical level, the results indicate that the emergent theory rather than the rational agent theory demonstrated a greater fidelity to the empirical observations. Originality/value – The paper assessed the feasibility of using innovative dichotomous process performance indicators as a tool for redesigning the business process at the ward level, in order to achieve macro‐level policy objectives. The failure to successfully implement a top‐down universal approach to redesigning business processes in health care is likely to reflect a lack of appreciation of emergent rationality that characterizes essential aspects of the PCP. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Business Process Management Journal Emerald Publishing

Process performance indicators in redesigning the patient care process

Download PDF
27 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/process-performance-indicators-in-redesigning-the-patient-care-process-Ko00GErl70
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
1463-7154
DOI
10.1108/14637151111182738
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate the regulator's attempt at redesigning the patient care process (PCP) – a core business process in public hospitals – by introducing dichotomous process performance indicators as an innovative management tool intended to align the State health care policy with the everyday management of operations at a hospital ward. Design/methodology/approach – The paper presents an ethnographic case study of redesigning the PCP according to the strategy originating outside the organization. The study employs competing theories that represent alternative epistemological and ontological views of the world in order to produce a tentative explanation of why the intended redesign of the PCP has not fully eventuated. Observational data and opportunistic interviewing are used to answer the research question of whether and how the information and operational flows on the ward were affected by introduction of process performance indicators. A business process redesign framework was employed for data analysis since it better reflects the objectives of the State‐wide initiative and offers a convenient tool in dealing with data complexity. Findings – Introduction of the process performance indicators did not result in redesigning of the PCP as intended by health care authorities. Out of four process performance indicators, only one was consistently implemented, which merely produced a duplication of the previously collected information, therefore adding no value to the PCP. On a theoretical level, the results indicate that the emergent theory rather than the rational agent theory demonstrated a greater fidelity to the empirical observations. Originality/value – The paper assessed the feasibility of using innovative dichotomous process performance indicators as a tool for redesigning the business process at the ward level, in order to achieve macro‐level policy objectives. The failure to successfully implement a top‐down universal approach to redesigning business processes in health care is likely to reflect a lack of appreciation of emergent rationality that characterizes essential aspects of the PCP.

Journal

Business Process Management Journal – Emerald Publishing

Published: Nov 8, 2011

Keywords: Australia; Hospital management; Health care; Service delivery systems; Process redesign; Process performance indicators; Ethnographic case study

References

  • Effective discharge strategy: performance indicator development project
    Acute Health Division, State of Victoria Department of Human Services
  • Supplementary Information for the Effective Discharge Strategy Performance Indicators Audit
    Acute Health Division, State of Victoria Department of Human Services
  • Prediction and change of behavior in the prisoner's dilemma
    Ajzen, I.
  • An assessment of discharge planning models: communication in referrals for home care
    Anderson, M.A.; Helms, L.
  • The evolution of quality in the US health care industry: an old wine in a new bottle
    Asubonteng, P.; Mccleary, K.J.; Munchus, G.
  • How can we argue with performance indicators?
    Batterham, R.
  • Perfomance indicators: good, bad, and ugly
    Bird, M.; Cox, D.; Farewell, V.; Goldstein, H.; Holt, T.; Smith, P.
  • Medicare reform: via managed care or managed competition?
    Cunningham, F.C.
  • TQM and BPR: beyond the beyond myth
    De Cock, C.; Hipkin, I.
  • Literature Review: Integrated Bed and Patient Management
    Dwyer, J.; Jackson, T.
  • Belief Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research
    Fishbein, M.; Aizen, I.
  • Studying the Organisation and Delivery of Health Services: Research Methods
    Fulop, N.; Allen, P.; Clarke, A.; Black, N.
  • Thick description: toward an interpretive theory of culture
    Geertz, C.
  • Business process reengineering: a tutorial on the concept, evolution, method, technology and application
    Grover, V.; Malhotra, M.K.
  • Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution
    Hammer, M.; Champy, J.
  • Just Managing. Power and Culture in the NHS
    Harrison, S.D.; Hunter, D.; Marnoch, G.; Politt, C.
  • Office Automation: A Social and Organizational Perspective
    Hirschheim, R.A.
  • Issues and approaches to appraising techological change in the office: a consequential perspective
    Klein, H.R.; Hirschheim, R.A.
  • Business process management (BPM) standards: a survey
    Ko, R.K.L.; Lee, S.S.G.; Lee, E.W.
  • Standard, routine and non‐routine processes in health care
    Lillrank, P.; Liukko, M.
  • Reengineering as knowledge management: a case of change in UK healthcare
    McNulty, T.
  • Redesigning public services: challenges of practice for policy
    McNulty, T.
  • Information technology and organisational change: causal structure in theory and research
    Markus, M.L.; Robey, D.
  • Conceptual framework for understanding business processes and business process modeling
    Melão, N.; Pidd, M.A.
  • Background Paper: A Framework for Effective Discharge
    Metropolitan Health and Aged Care Services Division, State of Victoria Department of Human Services
  • Explaining Organizational Behavior
    Mohr, L.B.
  • Hidden agendas, power and managerial assumptions in information systems development
    Myers, M.D.; Yong, L.W.
  • An iconoclastic view of health cost containment
    Newhouse, J.P.
  • Good medicine: a case study of BPR in a hospital
    Packwood, T.; Politt, C.; Roberts, S.
  • Organisations and Organisational Theory
    Pfeffer, J.
  • Steps toward a partnership: ethnography and systems design
    Randall, D.; Hughes, J.; Shapiro, D.
  • Studying organizational computing infrastructures: multi‐method approaches
    Sawyer, S.
  • Business process management: a survey
    van der Aast, W.M.P.; ter Hofstede, A.H.M.; Weske, M.
  • Monitoring health‐care processes: a framework for performance indicators
    van der Bij, J.D.; Vissers, J.M.H.
  • Performance management in healthcare: performance indicator development, task uncertainty, and types of performance indicators
    van der Geer, E.; van Tuijl, H.; Rutte, C.
  • Integrated care management: applying control theory to networks
    van Raak, A.; Paulus, A.; van Merode, F.; Mur‐Veeman, I.
  • A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies
    Venkatesh, V.; Davis, F.D.
  • Practice guidelines: a new reality in medicine: III impact on patient care
    Woolf, S.H.
  • Case Study Research Design and Methods
    Yin, R.K.
  • Discharge planning: a multidisciplinary approach
    Zarle, N.C.