Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12
Journal of Economic Inequality, 11
International Journal of Manpower, 4
Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 56
University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989
Industrial Relations, 58
Journal of African American Studies, 14
Journal of Economic History, 66
Contemporary Economic Policy, 18
International Economic Review, 14
Labour
American Sociological Review, 66
American Journal of Sociology, 5
Journal of Labor Economics, 3
Industrial Relations, 48
Economics of Education Review, 16
Journal of Human Resources, 39
Demography, 52
Social Forces, 86
Social Forces, 93
Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 37
Review of Economics of the Household, 15
Econometrica, 64
Journal of Political Economy, 105
Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19
American Economic Review, 62
The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115
Review of Black Political Economy, 42
Sociology Mind, 2
Journal of Human Resources, 8
Journal of Economic Literature, 55
Contemporary Sociology, 29
Social Science Research, 32
Review of Economics and Statistics, 90
Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 61
Feminist Economics, 28
American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings, 107
This paper explores the wages of White, Black, Hispanic, Asian, Native American and “other race” women and men once differences in basic characteristics among these 12 groups are accounted for. The authors aim to extend comparisons beyond those of women and men of the same race or the various races within a given gender.Design/methodology/approachTo undertake the conditional analysis, first, the authors propose a simple re-weighing scheme that allows to build a counterfactual economy in which workers' attributes for all gender–race/ethnicity groups are the same. Second, the authors use a well-known re-weighting scheme that involves logit estimations.FindingsOnly Hispanic men, Native American men and Asian women have conditional wages around average. Black men and, especially, White, Black, Hispanic, Native American and “other race” women have conditional wages clearly below average, whereas those of Asian and White men are well above average. The wage differential between a privileged and a deprived group is disentangled into the premium of the former and the penalty of the latter, which brings a new perspective to what has been done in the literature based on pairwise comparisons. In this intersectional framework, the authors document that gender penalizes more than race.Originality/valueThis paper examines intergroup earnings differentials using a methodology that allows to examine 12 gender–race/ethnicity groups jointly, which is this work's distinctive feature. The authors' intersectional framework allows to picture the effect of gender and race/ethnicity more broadly than what the literature has shown thus far.
International Journal of Manpower – Emerald Publishing
Published: May 31, 2023
Keywords: Gender; Earnings; Ethnicity; Race; Intersectionality
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.