Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
N. Šarkić, M. Nikolić
Sudski izvršitelj – bailiff: da ili ne?
V. Ristić
Prinudno izvršenje vansudskim putem u građanskom pravu
N. Šarkić, M. Nikolić
Reforma izvršnog postupka
D. Stojanović
Stvarno pravo
A. Janevski, T. Zoroska‐Kamilovska
Novi sistem izvršenja po novom Zakonu o izvršenju Makedonije
H. Kofrc, A. Berbić
Mogućnosti primjene javno‐privatnog partnerstva u Bosni i Hercegovini – stanje i perspektive
A. Uzelac
Kako organizirati efikasno izvršenje nespornih tražbina? –Komparativne napomene na temelju hrvatskih iskustava
A. Huseinbegović
Uloga sudskog izvršioca u civilnom izvršnom postupku
N. Šarkić, M. Nikolić
Vansudski izvršitelj i javni beležnik – nove pravosudne profesije
S. Spasić
Novine u nacrtu Zakona o izvršenju i obezbeđenju sa posebnim osvrtom na izvršitelja, Zlatiborski dani prava
A. Janevski
Potreba da se sudovi rasterete od nespornih stvari
M. (Ed.) Milošević
Priručnik za izvršitelje: odabrane teme za praktičnu primenu propisa o izvršenju
V. Ristić
U susret novom Zakonu o izvršenju i obezbeđenju
M. Trgovčević‐Prokić
Ovlašćenja javnog beležnika i izvršitelja u izvršnom postupku
N. Šarkić, M. Nikolić
Sudski izvršitelj ili privatni izvršitelj
V. Ristić
Harmonizacija građanskog procesnog prava“
N. Bodiroga
Privatni izvršitelj
M. Lassman
Zahvalnica
Purpose – In a 2011 law, Serbia included the private sector in enforcement procedures implemented by private bailiffs in addition to those appointed by the court. The purpose of this paper is to determine whether this situation is a form of public‐private partnership. Analyzing the causes of court enforcement crises, this paper establishes whether this step was necessary. Design/methodology/approach – In the development of this paper, normative, sociological, dogmatic and axiological methodologies have been used. Findings – The introduction of private bailiffs into civil enforcement is a unique public‐private partnership, necessary and justified since it removes all causes of crises in the Serbian system of enforcement. Practical implications – It is more likely that Serbian citizens will entrust enforcement to private bailiffs. Social implications – This paper contributes to understanding private bailiffs' roles in Serbian society and builds a positive attitude toward this public‐private partnership. Originality/value – In this paper, public‐private partnership is examined from a new viewpoint and expands cases where the private sector is included from court sanctions. The paper contributes to a better understanding of the institution of private bailiffs, explains its role in the settlement of Serbian enforcement crises and suggests connections between the institution and strengthening the economy.
International Journal of Public Sector Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Feb 22, 2013
Keywords: Serbia; Private bailiffs; Public‐private partnership; Law enforcement
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.