Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
There is a double crisis in modern science and in particular inphysics and mechanics. Among others Einstein and Stephane Lupasco, inthe 1930s, warned about this crisis. The Quantum Theory cannot bereconciled with the Relativity Theory. Specifically there is a gapcleavage between micro and macrophysics and mechanics.Parallel or beneath there is also a second crisis derived from adiscontinuity again a cleavage between classical and modern science,that is between two previous revolutions. A new research programme of asimultaneous equilibrium versus disequilibrium approach, initiallyapplied in economics has now been extended to include natural sciences.It is the question of a new, more comprehensive methodology which isactually a sui generis synthesis between classical and modernheritage. The rigorous application of the new research programme leadsto the organisation of an Orientation Table, that is, a methodologicalmap of all possible combinations systems. The Table shows, without anyexaggeration, a few revolutionary results. For instance, with the helpof the Table, modern science or the second revolution Einstein, Bohr,Heisenberg does not appear contradictory but rathercomplementary to classical science or the first revolution Newton,Lavoisier. The Kuhnian thesis to the contrary is disproved and thesecond crisis is solved. With the help of the Universal Hypothesis ofDuality the basis of the Orientation Table, matter and energy, at themicro and macrolevel, appear in a double form the Principle ofDuality stable equilibrium particles and unstable disequilibriumwaves. The strong interactions from modern physics are associated withthe law of gravitation attraction or stable equilibrium whichgoverns stable matter and energy. The weak interactions are associatedwith the law of disgravitation dispersion or repulsionincluding entropy or unstable equilibrium which governs unstable matterand energy. In this way the first crisis is also solved.
International Journal of Social Economics – Emerald Publishing
Published: Apr 1, 1989
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.