Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
Prejudice against research heroin users Laura Palfreyman, Natalie Moore, Gordon Hodson and David Clark The first in a series of articles from University of Subjects were asked about their emotions and Wales, Swansea on attitudes to drug users and feelings toward heroin users and former heroin their rehabilitation users. The most common responses were: Heroin users Former heroin users People who misuse heroin and other drugs often Anger (56%) Anger (45%) have other problems, including health, social and Sympathy (29%) Compassion (29%) criminal justice problems. They are often Pity (27%) Pity (26%) unemployed. Helping heroin misusers involves Compassion (21%) Sympathy (21%) more than just helping them become drug-free. Sadness (21%) Disgust (14%) Aftercare is required to prevent relapse. Disgust (21%) Respect (12%) Rehabilitation involves helping the person deal with the problems that accompany their drug misuse, The most common responses towards disabled including their lack of employment. people were: compassion (48%); sympathy (21%); How easy is it for former heroin users (and admiration (9%); sadness (9%); pity (7%); anger heroin users) to obtain a job? And how prejudiced is (2%). our society towards people who are experiencing or Subjects were asked whether heroin users (or have experienced a problem with heroin? the other groups) were responsible for their Researchers at the University of Wales, Swansea unemployment problem. Scores could range from explored the extent of prejudice reported by +3 (strongly agree) to -3 (strongly disagree). The university students against heroin users, former average scores were: heroin users 1.42; former heroin users and disabled people. Attitudes toward heroin users 0.91; disabled people -1.33. these groups in relation to employment were also Subjects were asked whether heroin users, evaluated. former users and disabled people themselves were In total, 141 undergraduates indicated their responsible for solving their unemployment responses to a variety of open and closed problem. Scores could range from +3 (strongly questions. Each experimental group comprised over agree) to -3 (strongly disagree). The average scores 40 subjects. were: heroin users 0.78; former heroin users 0.51; Subjects were asked to indicate their attitude to disabled people -0.90. heroin users, former heroin users or disabled University students believe that heroin users and people. The thermometer ranged from 100 former users (but not disabled people) are (extremely favourable) to 50 (neither favourable or responsible for causing their unemployment and it unfavourable) to 0 (extremely unfavourable). The is up to them to solve the problem. Students also scores were: heroin users 23.0; former heroin users show strong negative emotions and feelings both 41.5; disabled people 72.9. to heroin users and former users. D r ugs and Alcohol Today • Volume 4 Issue 1 • April 2004 © Pavilion
Drugs and Alcohol Today – Emerald Publishing
Published: Apr 1, 2004
You can share this free article with as many people as you like with the url below! We hope you enjoy this feature!
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.