Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Journal of Policy Modeling, 35
BIS Quarterly Review
Research in International Business and Finance, 36
The American Economic Review, 89
International Review of Financial Analysis, 24
The Journal of Political Economy, 100
Journal of Institutional Financial Markets Institutions and Money, 18
Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106
Journal of Banking and Finance, 30
Journal of International Money and Finance, 24
Journal of Banking and Finance, 37
Journal of Financial Stability, 9
Research in International Business and Finance, 21
National Institute Economic Review, 192
Intereconomics, 49
Economic Letter, 8
IMF Staff Papers, 45
Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 46
International Review of Financial Analysis, 17
The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110
Journal of International Money and Finance, 25
Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107
Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review, 56
Journal of Financial Intermediation, 17
Journal of Banking and Finance, 37
Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review, 51
Economic Letters, 70
Journal of International Money and Finance, 27
ACRN Journal of Finance and Risk Perspectives, 1
The Economic Journal, 106
Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, 4
The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128
Economic Letters, 99
Economic Modeling, 49
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to answer one important question: in the aftermath of a systemic banking crisis, can the expected deviations in credit supply, liquidity, and other bank characteristics become entrenched in that they do not converge back to “normal”?Design/methodology/approachUsing a panel data set of commercial banks in the Mercosur during the period 1990-2006, the authors analyze the impact of crises on four sets of financial indicators of bank behavior and outcomes – profitability, maturity preference, credit supply, and risk taking. The authors employ convergence methodology – which is often used in the growth literature – to identify the evolution of bank behavior in the region after crises.FindingsA key finding of the paper is that bank risk-taking behavior is significantly modified leading to prolonged reduction of intermediation to the private sector in favor of less risky government securities and preference for high levels excess liquidity well after the crisis. This can be attributed to the role played by macroeconomic and institutional volatility that has nurtured a relatively high level of risk aversion in banks in the Mercosur.Originality/valueTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, using convergence methodology is a relatively novel approach in this area. An added advantage of using this approach over others currently used in the literature is that the authors can empirically quantify the rate of convergence and the institutional and macroeconomic factors that condition the convergence. Moreover, the methodology allows one to identify – in some hierarchical order – factors that condition persistent deviation from “normality.” The lessons learned from the Mercosur case study are useful for countries that suffered systemic banking crises in the aftermath of the global financial crisis.
International Journal of Emerging Markets – Emerald Publishing
Published: Sep 19, 2016
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.