Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Maureen O’Sullivan, M. Frank, Carolyn Hurley, Jaspreet Tiwana (2009)
Police Lie Detection Accuracy: The Effect of Lie ScenarioLaw and Human Behavior, 33
R. Leo (1996)
Inside the Interrogation RoomJournal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 86
J.F. Yates
Judgment and Decision Making
R. Leo (2008)
Adapting to Miranda: Modern Interrogators' Strategies for Dealing with the Obstacles Posed by Miranda
S.M. Kassin
A critical appraisal of modern police interviews
For personal use only--not for distribution. The Correspondence Bias
H. Davies
Understanding variations in murder clearance rates: the influence of the political environment
E. Aronson, T. Wilson, M. Brewer (1998)
Experimentation in social psychology.
William Waegel (1981)
Case Routinization in Investigative Police WorkSocial Problems, 28
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Uniform Crime Reporting Handbook
S. Kassin, Christine Goldstein, K. Savitsky (2003)
Behavioral Confirmation in the Interrogation Room: On the Dangers of Presuming GuiltLaw and Human Behavior, 27
G. Thomas, R. Leo (2002)
The Effects of Miranda v. Arizona: "Embedded" in Our National Culture?Crime and Justice, 29
C. Bond, B. DePaulo (2006)
Accuracy of Deception JudgmentsPersonality and Social Psychology Review, 10
S.M. Kassin, R.A. Leo, C.A. Meissner, K.D. Richman, L.H. Colwell, A.M. Leach, D. La Fon
Police interviewing and interview: a self‐report survey of police practices and beliefs
Timothy Keel, John Jarvis, Yvonne Muirhead (2009)
An Exploratory Analysis of Factors Affecting Homicide InvestigationsHomicide Studies, 13
M.G. Aamodt, H. Custer
Who can best catch a liar? A meta‐analysis of individual differences in detecting deception
R.A. Leo
Inside the interview room
B. DePaulo (1988)
Nonverbal aspects of deceptionJournal of Nonverbal Behavior, 12
B. DePaulo, Susan Kirkendol (1989)
The Motivational Impairment Effect in the Communication of Deception
Scott Culhane, H. Hosch, Cary Heck (2008)
Interrogation Technique Endorsement by Current Law Enforcement, Future Law Enforcement, and LaypersonsPolice Quarterly, 11
V. Time, B. Payne (2002)
Police chiefs' perceptions about Miranda: An analysis of survey dataJournal of Criminal Justice, 30
A. Vrij, S. Mann (2001)
Telling and detecting lies in a high-stake situation: the case of a convicted murdererApplied Cognitive Psychology, 15
D.T. Gilbert, P.S. Malone
The correspondence bias
H. Davies (2007)
Understanding Variations in Murder Clearance RatesHomicide Studies, 11
E.E. Jones
Interpersonal Perception
M. O'Sullivan, M.G. Frank, C.M. Hurley, J. Tiwana
Police lie detection: the effect of the lie scenario
Lori Colwell, Holly Miller, P. Lyons, Rowland Miller (2006)
The Training of Law Enforcement Officers in Detecting Deception: A Survey of Current Practices and Suggestions for Improving AccuracyPolice Quarterly, 9
C. Bond, B. DePaulo (2006)
Accuracy of Deception Judgments: Appendix APersonality and Social Psychology Review, 10
Purpose – Experimental research on lie detection has indicated that accuracy rates hover around chance but that police are significantly better in detecting deception in “high” stakes rather than “low” stakes situations. This paper has three objectives: to compare confidence levels in lie detection for property crime and violent crime detectives; to compare differences in confidence levels for custodial and noncustodial interviews; and to evaluate the relationship between interrogation techniques and lie detection confidence. Design/methodology/approach – The study uses self‐report data from a sample of Texas police detectives. Findings – The results of this study show that property crime detectives are significantly more confident in their lie detection ability than are violent crime detectives. The results also highlight the fact that police detectives are significantly less confident in their lie detection abilities when the suspect has been provided his or her Miranda warnings. Originality/value – The study highlights the disparity in findings derived from self‐reported data and experimental studies on veracity judgments and the need to account for contextual factors that ultimately impact the ecological validity of this research.
Journal of Criminal Psychology – Emerald Publishing
Published: Mar 16, 2012
Keywords: Police; Lie detection; Crime types; Miranda; Interview techniques; Police custody; Accuracy; United States of America
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.