Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
Describes how the 1986 Financial Services Act gives the FSA power to pursue not only those breaching its rules but others who become involved in breaches by being “knowingly concerned”; the FSA can apply to the courts for an injunction or for a restitution order, and if the person is in fact a bank it has a new extra‐judicial power to make it disgorge the profits and/or compensate for the loss. Explains at length what “knowingly concerned” means in the context of the criminal and civil law. Shows how banks are now under significant obligation to obtain information about their clients, and this results in knowledge for the purpose of “knowingly concerned” liability; they also have to report suspicions of money laundering and generally cooperate with the FSA.
Journal of Financial Crime – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jul 1, 2005
Keywords: United Kingdom; Banks; Liability; Financial services
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.