Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S. Hebib, E. Farrell (2003)
Some experiences on the stabilization of Irish peatsCanadian Geotechnical Journal, 40
P. Moore (1989)
The ecology of peat-forming processes: a reviewInternational Journal of Coal Geology, 12
A. Landva, P. Pheeney (1980)
Peat fabric and structure.Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 17
R. Hashim, Islam (2008)
A model study to determine engineering properties of peat soil and effect on strength after stabilisation
R. Hashim (2008)
Engineering Properties of stabilised tropical peat soils
B. Huat, Shukri Maail, T. Mohamed (2005)
Effect of Chemical Admixtures on the Engineering Properties of Tropical Peat SoilsAmerican Journal of Applied Sciences, 2
R. Hashim (2008)
Engineering behaviour of stabilized peat soilEuropean journal of scientific research, 21
A. Skempton, D. Petley (1970)
Ignition Loss and other Properties of Peats and Clays from Avonmouth, King's Lynn and Cranberry MossGeotechnique, 20
This paper presents physical and geotechnical characteristics of unstabilized (original) and stabilized peat soil samples from Sarawak, Malaysia. Peat soil is heterogeneous, with high compressibility, high water content, low specific gravity and has medium to low permeability. As a result, evaluation of physical and geotechnical properties are very important for any types of construction on it. Different physical and geotechnical properties e.g. organic content, loss on ignition, liquid limit, specific gravity, fiber content, compaction and Unconfined Compressive Strength (UCS) tests have been carried out on peat soil sample. Locally available fly ash (FA) from coal fired thermal power plant and commercially available quick lime (QL) were used as stabilizers. The amount of FA and QL added to the peat soil sample, is 5 to 25% and 2 to 8%; respectively, for curing periods of 7 to 120 days. The standard Proctor compaction test and UCS test were carried out on original and stabilized peat soil samples with the above mentioned percentages of stabilizer and results show that the UCS value increases significantly with the increase of FA and QL percentage and also with curing periods. But, with 15 to 20 % FA and 6 % QL added with peat soil, the UCS values slightly decreases up to 28 days and again increases after 120 days curing periods. Furthermore, liquid limit and specific gravity tests have been carried out with only for the FA stabilized peat soil samples, in order to comprehend their stabilized behavior.
World Journal of Engineering – Emerald Publishing
Published: Sep 1, 2011
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.