Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Rahim (1983)
A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict.Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management, 26 2
Linda Price, E. Arnould (1999)
Commercial Friendships: Service Provider--Client Relationships in ContextJournal of Marketing, 63
R. Day, Ronald Michaels, Barbara Perdue (1988)
How buyers handle conflictsIndustrial Marketing Management, 17
R. McCrae, P. Costa (1996)
Toward a new generation of personality theories: Theoretical contexts for the five-factor model.
L. Goldberg (1992)
THE DEVELOPMENT OF MARKERS FOR THE BIG-FIVE FACTOR STRUCTUREPsychological Assessment, 4
D. McAdams (1995)
What Do We Know When We Know a PersonJournal of Personality, 63
L. Rosenberg, L. Stern (1970)
Toward the Analysis of Conflict in Distribution Channels: A Descriptive ModelJournal of Marketing, 34
P. Carnevale, D. Pruitt (1992)
NEGOTIATION AND MEDIATIONAnnual Review of Psychology, 43
D. Pruitt (1983)
Strategic Choice in NegotiationAmerican Behavioral Scientist, 27
R. Cattell (1943)
The description of personality: basic traits resolved into clusters.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 38
J. Digman, N. Takemoto-Chock (1981)
Factors In The Natural Language Of Personality: Re-Analysis, Comparison, And Interpretation Of Six Major Studies.Multivariate behavioral research, 16 2
L. Goldberg (1990)
An alternative "description of personality": the big-five factor structure.Journal of personality and social psychology, 59 6
J. Gaski (1984)
The Theory of Power and Conflict in Channels of DistributionJournal of Marketing, 48
J. Digman (1990)
PERSONALITY STRUCTURE: EMERGENCE OF THE FIVE-FACTOR MODELAnnual Review of Psychology, 41
G. Āllport, H. Odbert (1936)
Trait-names: A psycho-lexical study.The Psychological Monographs, 47
W. Graziano, L. Jensen‐Campbell, E. Hair (1996)
Perceiving interpersonal conflict and reacting to it: the case for agreeableness.Journal of personality and social psychology, 70 4
Pruitt, G. Dean, Rubin, Z. Jeffrey, Kim, Sung Hee. (1986)
Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement
K. Gleason, L. Jensen‐Campbell, D. Richardson (2004)
Agreeableness as a predictor of aggression in adolescenceAggressive Behavior, 30
David Antonioni (1998)
Relationship between the Big Five personality factors and conflict management styles.International Journal of Conflict Management, 9
M. Knapp, Linda Putnam, Lillian Davis (1988)
Measuring Interpersonal Conflict in Organizations:Management Communication Quarterly, 1
M. Rahim (2002)
Toward a Theory of Managing Organizational ConflictInternational Journal of Conflict Management, 13
Bernard Jaworski, Ajay Kohli (1993)
Market Orientation: Antecedents and ConsequencesJournal of Marketing, 57
O. John, S. Srivastava (1999)
The Big Five Trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives.
Mary Utley, D. Richardson, C. Pilkington (1989)
Personality and interpersonal conflict managementPersonality and Individual Differences, 10
L. Jensen‐Campbell, W. Graziano (2001)
Agreeableness as a moderator of interpersonal conflict.Journal of personality, 69 2
Stephen Tax, Stephen Brown, Murali Chandrashekaran (1998)
Customer Evaluations of Service Complaint Experiences: Implications for Relationship MarketingJournal of Marketing, 62
D. Strutton, L. Pelton (1997)
Negotiation: bringing more to the table than demands.Marketing health services, 17 1
Anil Menon, Sundar Bharadwaj, R. Howell (1996)
The quality and effectiveness of marketing strategy: Effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict in intraorganizational relationshipsJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 24
K. Ohbuchi, J. Tedeschi (1997)
Multiple Goals and Tactical Behaviors in Social Conflicts1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27
O. Fukushima, K. Ohbuchi (1996)
ANTECEDENTS AND EFFECTS OF MULTIPLE GOALS IN CONFLICT RESOLUTIONInternational Journal of Conflict Management, 7
W. Graziano, L. Jensen‐Campbell (2005)
Methodologies for Studying Personality Processes in Interpersonal ConflictInternational Negotiation, 10
Afzalur Rahim, T. Bonoma (1979)
Managing Organizational Conflict: A Model for Diagnosis and InterventionPsychological Reports, 44
K. Ohbuchi, O. Fukushima (1997)
PERSONALITY AND INTERPERSONAL CONFLICT: AGGRESSIVENESS, SELF‐MONITORING, AND SITUATIONAL VARIABLESInternational Journal of Conflict Management, 8
P. Moberg (2001)
LINKING CONFLICT STRATEGY TO THE FIVE‐FACTOR MODEL: THEORETICAL AND EMPIRICAL FOUNDATIONSInternational Journal of Conflict Management, 12
V. Zeithaml, A. Parasuraman, L. Berry (1990)
Delivering quality service : balancing customer perceptions and expectations
S. Juni (1995)
Revised NEO personality inventory, 33
M. Rawwas, S. Vitell, J. Barnes (1997)
Management of Conflict Using Individual Power Sources: A Retailers' PerspectiveJournal of Business Research, 40
A. Parasuraman, V. Zeithaml, L. Berry (1985)
A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future ResearchJournal of Marketing, 49
J. Graham (1986)
The problem-solving approach to negotiations in industrial marketingJournal of Business Research, 14
X. Song, Jinhong Xie, B. Dyer (2000)
Antecedents and Consequences of Marketing Managers’ Conflict-Handling BehaviorsJournal of Marketing, 64
Purpose – This research aims to examine the link between personality, motives, and the choice of conflict resolution strategy in a service conflict context. Design/methodology/approach – Participants' responses to a service conflict scenario were coded into strategy categories and both personality (the Big Five) and motives were measured with established scales. Differences in personality and motives across the strategies were assessed with ANOVA and the relationship between personality and motives was assessed with multiple‐regression. Findings – While the results did not show a direct relationship between personality and choice of strategy, they did indicate an indirect link through motives. The results also show that consumers used a variety of strategies based on a mix of economic and social motives. Research limitations/implications – The results show that social motives play an important role in business conflicts. The study also supports a multi‐level perspective of personality, where basic tendencies (the Big Five) impact characteristic adaptations (motives), which are more closely related to behavior. Practical implications – The results suggest that consumer behavior in dealing with conflict can be complex and that service provider cannot rely on “one best way” strategies for dealing with customers. Managers should also be sensitive to the importance that social motives play in conflict resolution, particularly the importance consumers place on fairness. Originality/value – The paper illustrates how social motives play an important role in business conflicts.
International Journal of Conflict Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Apr 25, 2008
Keywords: Conflict resolution; Consumer behaviour; Influence; Management effectiveness; Individual psychology
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.