Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Daniel Solove (2020)
The Myth of the Privacy ParadoxInformation Privacy Law eJournal
M. Jacobides (2020)
Regulating Big Tech in Europe: Why, so What, and How Understanding Their Business Models and Ecosystems Can Make a DifferenceSpatial Analysis & Techniques eJournal
L. Drechsler (2018)
Data as Counter-performance: A New Way Forward or a Step Back for the Fundamental Right of Data Protection?
(2014)
Rethinking personal data: a new lens for strengthening trust
L. Brown (2020)
Personal data – the new gold mine for corporations
M. Lieshout (2014)
The Value of Personal Data
B. Shepard (2021)
The new rise of contextual advertising
Long Chen, Yadong Huang, Shumiao Ouyang, Weie Xiong (2021)
The Data Privacy Paradox and Digital DemandSSRN Electronic Journal
Stephen Robinson (2017)
Self-Disclosure and Managing Privacy: Implications for Interpersonal and Online Communication for Consumers and MarketersJournal of Internet Commerce, 16
(2020)
Guidelines 05/2020 on consent under regulation 2016/679
Daniel Susser, B. Roessler, H. Nissenbaum (2018)
Online Manipulation: Hidden Influences in a Digital World
Nora Draper, J. Turow (2019)
The corporate cultivation of digital resignationNew Media & Society, 21
Kerstin Bongard-Blanchy, Arianna Rossi, S. Rivas, Sophie Doublet, Vincent Koenig, G. Lenzini (2021)
”I am Definitely Manipulated, Even When I am Aware of it. It’s Ridiculous!” - Dark Patterns from the End-User PerspectiveProceedings of the 2021 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference
K. Hart (2021)
Big tech’s small biz squeeze. Axios
J.S. Dahl, T. Judin (2021)
Intention to issue €10 million fine to Grindr LLC
A. Vujanic, N. Goldstein (2015)
U.S. Consumers want more personalized retail experience and control over personal information, Accenture survey shows
(2013)
Exploring the economics of personal data: a survey of methodologies for measuring monetary value
(2013)
Unlocking the value of personal data: from collection to usage
A. Acquisti, L. Brandimarte, G. Loewenstein (2015)
Privacy and human behavior in the age of informationScience, 347
Tamara Kneese (2019)
Networked heirlooms: the affective and financial logics of digital estate planningCultural Studies, 33
H. Nissenbaum (2019)
Contextual Integrity Up and Down the Data Food ChainTheoretical Inquiries in Law, 20
D. Geradin, Theano Karanikioti, Dimitrios Katsifis (2020)
GDPR Myopia: how a well-intended regulation ended up favouring large online platforms - the case of ad techEuropean Competition Journal, 17
R. Baldwin, J. Black (2016)
Driving Priorities in Risk‐Based Regulation: What's the Problem?Law
C. Gates, Peter Matthews (2014)
Data Is the New Currency
(2022)
Risks from the use of dark patterns for consumers and the digital single market
I. Iusmen, H. Stalford (2020)
Networked Children, Commercial Profiling and the EU Data Protection Reform Agenda: In the Child’s Best Interests?
Filipe Ribeiro, Koustuv Saha, Mahmoudreza Babaei, Lucas Henrique, Johnnatan Messias, Fabrício Benevenuto, Oana Goga, K. Gummadi, Elissa Redmiles (2018)
On Microtargeting Socially Divisive Ads: A Case Study of Russia-Linked Ad Campaigns on FacebookProceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency
T. Raats, Tom Evens, Sanne Ruelens (2016)
Sustaining local audiovisual ecosystems: analysis of financing and production of domestic TV fiction in small media markets, 4
Alessandra Cervone (2018)
UNFAIR CONTRACT TERMS AND SHARING OF DATA WITH FACEBOOK, TOWARDS A BETTER PROTECTION OF SOCIAL MEDIA USERS: THE WHATSAPP CASES, 4
Peter Bro, Filip Wallberg (2014)
Digital GatekeepingDigital Journalism, 2
(2023)
Value
Tesary Lin (2019)
Valuing Intrinsic and Instrumental Preferences for PrivacyQuantitative Marketing eJournal
Donna Harawy (2022)
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial PerspectivePhilosophical Literary Journal Logos
Idris Adjerid, A. Acquisti, L. Brandimarte, G. Loewenstein (2013)
Sleights of privacy: framing, disclosures, and the limits of transparency
Gianclaudio Malgieri (2020)
The concept of fairness in the GDPR: a linguistic and contextual interpretationProceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency
E. Steel, C. Locke, E. Cadman, B. Freese (2013)
How much is your personal data worth?
A. Acquisti, L. John, G. Loewenstein (2013)
What Is Privacy Worth?The Journal of Legal Studies, 42
R. Matheus, M. Janssen (2015)
Transparency Dimensions of Big and Open Linked Data - Transparency as Being Synonymous with Accountability and Openness
(2020)
Digitale vaardigheden bij burgers
J. Cabañas, Ángel Cuevas, R. Rumín (2018)
Unveiling and Quantifying Facebook Exploitation of Sensitive Personal Data for Advertising Purposes
Ripon Patgiri, Arif Ahmed (2016)
Big Data: The V's of the Game Changer Paradigm2016 IEEE 18th International Conference on High Performance Computing and Communications; IEEE 14th International Conference on Smart City; IEEE 2nd International Conference on Data Science and Systems (HPCC/SmartCity/DSS)
W. Günther, M. Mehrizi, M. Huysman, Frans Feldberg (2017)
Debating big data: A literature review on realizing value from big dataJ. Strateg. Inf. Syst., 26
(2009)
Keynote speech roundtable on online data collection, targeting and profiling
Z. Cole, H. Donohoe, M. Stellefson (2013)
Internet-Based Delphi Research: Case Based DiscussionEnvironmental Management, 51
S. Issenberg (2012)
How Obama’s team used big data to rally voters
Colin Gray, Yubo Kou, Bryan Battles, Joseph Hoggatt, Austin Toombs (2018)
The Dark (Patterns) Side of UX DesignProceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
B. By (2010)
The Value of Behavioral Targeting
Tama Leaver (2013)
The Social Media Contradiction: Data Mining and Digital DeathM/C Journal, 16
J. Turow, Michael Hennessy, Nora Draper (2015)
The Tradeoff Fallacy: How Marketers are Misrepresenting American Consumers and Opening Them Up to Exploitation
(2009)
Prioritization using MoSCoW
M. Nati (2018)
Personal data receipts: how transparency increases consumer trust
Geo. Wash. L. Rev, 89
(2020)
Google adverts under fire as small businesses say they cannot compete
(2020a)
Data never sleeps 8.0
(2020)
Exploring the value of media users’ personal information (PI) disclosure to media companies in Flanders
L. Chen, Y. Huang, S. Ouyang, W. Xiong (2021)
The data privacy paradox and digital demand (no. w28854)
Nadine Lindstädt (2010)
Multisided media markets: Applying the theory of multisided markets to media marketsZeitschrift für Wettbewerbsrecht, 8
Marketing Science
Susanne Barth, M. Jong (2017)
The privacy paradox - Investigating discrepancies between expressed privacy concerns and actual online behavior - A systematic literature reviewTelematics Informatics, 34
P. Hense (2021)
The end of dark patterns in ‘cookie walls’: German court bans deceptive designs
I. Picone (2017)
Conceptualizing media users across mediaConvergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 23
(2021)
How much is your data worth? The complete breakdown for 2021
Gianclaudio Malgieri, B. Custers (2017)
Pricing Privacy – The Right to Know the Value of Your Personal DataLeiden Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series
(2020b)
DOMO releases eight annual ‘data never sleeps
Logan Kugler (2018)
The war over the value of personal dataCommunications of the ACM, 61
J. Dijck (2014)
Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big Data between scientific paradigm and ideologysurveillance and society, 12
(2023)
What is big data
Andrej Miklošík, Martin Kuchta, Stefan Zak (2018)
Privacy Protection Versus Advertising Revenues: The Case of Content PublishersConnectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences
S. Spiekermann, Jana Korunovska, Christine Bauer (2012)
Psychology of Ownership and Asset Defense: Why People Value Their Personal Information Beyond PrivacyBehavioral & Experimental Economics eJournal
(2021)
The state of personalization 2021
Victoria Fast, Daniel Schnurr, M. Wohlfarth (2021)
Regulation of data-driven market power in the digital economy: Business value creation and competitive advantages from big dataJournal of Information Technology, 38
Ana Rutschman (2021)
Social Media Self-Regulation and the Rise of Vaccine MisinformationSSRN Electronic Journal
Laura Mann (2017)
Left to Other Peoples’ Devices? A Political Economy Perspective on the Big Data Revolution in DevelopmentDevelopment and Change, 49
Elizabeth Aguirre, D. Mahr, Dhruv Grewal, K. Ruyter, Martin Wetzels (2015)
Unraveling the personalization paradox: The effect of information collection and trust-building strategies on online advertisement effectivenessJournal of Retailing, 91
M.E. Anagnostou, M.A. Lambrou (2017)
A review of approaches to the value of privacy
(2020)
Humans fail the math of risk assessment
S. Polykalas, G. Prezerakos (2019)
When the mobile app is free, the product is your personal dataDigital Policy, Regulation and Governance
(2020)
Small businesses say they can’t afford to compete on Google
I. Van Zeeland, N. Van Buggenhout, J. Pierson (2019)
Personal data protection in the media sector: roundtable report: for chair ‘data protection on the ground
Regulation (EU)
2016/679 Of the European parliament and of the council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing directive 95/46/EC (general data protection regulation)
C. Veljanovski (2021)
THE COMPETITION ECONOMICS OF ONLINE PLATFORMSThe Singapore Economic Review
E. Clemons (2009)
The complex problem of monetizing virtual electronic social networksDecis. Support Syst., 48
J. Desjardins (2019)
How much data is generated each day
(2013)
Hive-design for big data
(2021)
The truth about google, Facebook, and small businesses
(2019)
Expert interviews and elite interviews for policy analysis in communication studies
A. Gandomi, Murtaza Haider (2015)
Beyond the hype: Big data concepts, methods, and analyticsInt. J. Inf. Manag., 35
J. Carrascal, Christopher Riederer, Vijay Erramilli, M. Cherubini, Rodrigo Oliveira (2011)
Your browsing behavior for a big mac: economics of personal information onlineProceedings of the 22nd international conference on World Wide Web
P. Glikman, N. Glady (2015)
What’s the value of your data
Pedro-Luis Pérez-Díaz, Rocío Medina, Enrique Langa (2020)
Between Self-Regulation and Participatory Monitoring: Comparing Digital News Media Accountability Practices in SpainMedia and Communication, 8
(2011)
Big data: business opportunities, requirements and oracle’s approach
K. Vandendriessche, E. Steenberghs, A. Matheve, A. Georges, L. De Marez (2021)
Imec digimeter 2020
(2015)
Coding and intercoder reliability
Journal of Law & Innovation, 4
(2019)
Tradeoffs: the currency of decision making
N. Lomas (2020)
France fines google $120M and amazon $42M for dropping tracking cookies without consent
Media users daily exchange personal data for “free” personalised media. Is this a fair trade, or user “exploitation”? Do personalisation benefits outweigh privacy risks?Design/methodology/approachThis study surveyed experts in three consecutive online rounds (e-Delphi). The authors explored personal data processing value for media, personalisation relevance, benefits and risks for users. The authors scrutinised the value-exchange between media and users and determined whether media communicate transparently, or use “dark patterns” to obtain more personal data.FindingsCommunication to users must be clear, correct and concise (prevent user deception). Experts disagree on “payment” with personal data for “free” personalised media. This study discerned obstacles and solutions to substantially balance the interests of media and users (fair value exchange). Personal data processing must be transparent, profitable to media and users. Media can agree “sector-wide” on personalisation transparency. Fair, secure and transparent information disclosure to media is possible through shared responsibility and effort.Originality/valueThis study’s innovative contribution is threefold: Firstly, focus on professional stakeholders’ opinion in the value network. Secondly, recommendations to clearly communicate personalised media value, benefits and risks to users. This allows media to create codes of conduct that increase user trust. Thirdly, expanding literature explaining how media realise personal data value, deal with stakeholder interests and position themselves in the data processing debate. This research improves understanding of personal data value, processing benefits and potential risks in a regional context and European regulatory framework.
Digital Policy Regulation and Governance – Emerald Publishing
Published: Apr 25, 2023
Keywords: Media; Personal data; Personalisation; Value exchange; Transparency; e-Delphi
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.