Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
P. Brewer
Putting strategy into the balanced scorecard
R. Kershaw, S. Kershaw
Developing a balanced scorecard to implement strategy at St Elsewhere Hospital
(1992)
multiple performance measures using interaction approach
M. Abdel-Kader, Robert. Luther (2006)
Management Accounting Practices in the British Food and Drinks IndustryCorporate Governance & Accounting eJournal
K. Sim, H. Koh (2001)
Balanced scorecard: a rising trend in strategic performance measurementMeasuring Business Excellence, 5
(2006)
“ A cross industry comparison of strategic management accounting practices : an exploratory study ”
R. Kaplan, D. Norton (2015)
The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance.Harvard business review, 70 1
Ron Basu (2001)
New criteria of performance managementMeasuring Business Excellence, 5
R. Kaplan, D. Norton
Translating Strategy into Action: The Balanced Scorecard
M. Lipe, S.E. Salterio
The balanced scorecard: judgmental effects of common and unique performance
R. Basu
New criteria of performance management: a transition from enterprise to collaborative supply chain
D. Norton
Beware: The Unbalanced Scorecard
M. Bourne, Monica Franco-Santos, M. Kennerley, V. Martinez (2005)
Reflections on the role, use and benefits of corporate performance measurement in the UKMeasuring Business Excellence, 9
M. Porter (1985)
Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance
(2006)
Assessing the alignment between business strategy and use
R. Miles, C. Snow, A. Meyer, H. Coleman (1978)
Organizational strategy, structure, and process.Academy of management review. Academy of Management, 3 3
R. Kaplan, D. Norton (1996)
The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action
P. Joshi, Jawahar Al‐Mudhaki, W. Bremser (2003)
Corporate budget planning, control and performance evaluation in BahrainManagerial Auditing Journal, 18
L. Maisel (2001)
Performance Measurement practices: survey results
M. Lipe, Steven Salterio (2000)
The Balanced Scorecard: Judgmental Effects of Common and Unique Performance MeasuresThe Accounting Review, 75
Andra Gumbus, Bridget Lyons (2002)
The Balanced Scorecard at Philips Electronics
Pj Smoot (2004)
Coming Up Short on Nonfinancial Performance MeasurementHarvard Business Review, 82
David Blackwell, James Brickley, Michael Weisback (1994)
Accounting information and internal performance evaluation Evidence from Texas banksJournal of Accounting and Economics, 17
R. Jusoh, D. Ibrahim, Y. Zainuddin
Assessing the alignment between business strategy and use of multiple performance measures using interaction approach
(1980)
Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors
Purpose – This study aims to examine performance evaluation measures across private sector companies in an Egyptian context and pinpoints obstacles that may limit the adoption of the balanced scorecard (BSC) . Design/methodology/approach – Uses a questionnaire that was mailed to a sample of 150 companies listed in the Egyptian stock exchange market. The analysis is directed at determining managers' perceptions of performance evaluation measures within the Egyptian private sector. Descriptive statistics, frequency of use of companies' practices and possible relationships between variables provide the basis for discussion. Findings – Companies rely on both financial and non‐financial measures of performance evaluation. The profit margin, as a financial measure, is also the most commonly used performance measure. Customer satisfaction is the most commonly used non‐financial measure of performance evaluation. The BSC has wide spread use in the Egyptian companies surveyed, but the level of use of multi‐dimensional indicators is significantly low. The survey provides considerable insight into obstacles inhibiting the adoption of the BSC. The most significant obstacle is the inadequacy of implemented information systems. Research limitations/implication – Survey results restrict generalization, as the sampling design cannot be claimed to represent all Egyptian companies. Also a relatively low response rates must be taken into account. Originality/value – Provides an insight into performance evaluation practices in the private sector in a developing country.
Managerial Auditing Journal – Emerald Publishing
Published: May 29, 2007
Keywords: Management accounting; Performance measurement (quality); Balanced scorecard; Egypt; Private sector organizations; Medium‐sized enterprises
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.