Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Perceived project complexity: a survey among practitioners of project management

Perceived project complexity: a survey among practitioners of project management Project complexity has been comprehensively investigated over the last two decades, resulting in many descriptive frameworks and models. The common layout is a multidimensional construct. While the perception of the complexity of projects is essential for a managerial approach, only scant research has been conducted into how practitioners perceive project complexity. The purpose of the paper is to fill this gap.Design/methodology/approachThis paper is a quantitative study based on a large survey among managers of projects with more than 1,000 participants. The questionnaire is designed based on a review of research literature on project complexity.FindingsThe findings indicate that practitioners' mental models are concentrated on only a few dimensions of the many found in descriptive models. Further, the findings indicate that the mental models are much influenced by the project role of the perceiver and less so by the type of project and sector.Originality/valueThis paper discusses the differentiation of concepts of perceived project complexity and provides a framework for a survey of the topic. The contribution of the paper is an increased understanding of practitioners' perceptions of project complexity as a concept very different from the descriptive frameworks that have been the focal point for research in project complexity thus far. The project complexity might be in the eye of the beholder; however, the findings indicate that the eyes are very much influenced by the project role of the beholder. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png International Journal of Managing Projects in Business Emerald Publishing

Perceived project complexity: a survey among practitioners of project management

Download PDF
19 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/perceived-project-complexity-a-survey-among-practitioners-of-project-KZm52DNjBl
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
1753-8378
DOI
10.1108/ijmpb-03-2020-0095
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Project complexity has been comprehensively investigated over the last two decades, resulting in many descriptive frameworks and models. The common layout is a multidimensional construct. While the perception of the complexity of projects is essential for a managerial approach, only scant research has been conducted into how practitioners perceive project complexity. The purpose of the paper is to fill this gap.Design/methodology/approachThis paper is a quantitative study based on a large survey among managers of projects with more than 1,000 participants. The questionnaire is designed based on a review of research literature on project complexity.FindingsThe findings indicate that practitioners' mental models are concentrated on only a few dimensions of the many found in descriptive models. Further, the findings indicate that the mental models are much influenced by the project role of the perceiver and less so by the type of project and sector.Originality/valueThis paper discusses the differentiation of concepts of perceived project complexity and provides a framework for a survey of the topic. The contribution of the paper is an increased understanding of practitioners' perceptions of project complexity as a concept very different from the descriptive frameworks that have been the focal point for research in project complexity thus far. The project complexity might be in the eye of the beholder; however, the findings indicate that the eyes are very much influenced by the project role of the beholder.

Journal

International Journal of Managing Projects in Business – Emerald Publishing

Published: Jul 31, 2020

Keywords: Perceived project complexity; Descriptive project complexity; Mental models; Survey of characteristics of project complexity

References

  • Researching complex projects: using causal mapping to take a systems perspective
    Ackermann, F.; Alexander, J.
  • The concept of project complexity—a review
    Baccarini, D.
  • Clarifying the project complexity construct: past, present and future
    Bakhshi, J.; Ireland, V.; Gorod, A.
  • Project complexity and team-level absorptive capacity as drivers of project management performance
    Bjorvatn, T.; Wald, A.
  • Grasping project complexity in large engineering projects: the TOE (Technical, Organizational and Environmental) framework
    Bosch-Rekveldt, M.; Jongkind, Y.; Mooi, H.; Bakker, H.; Verbraeck, A.
  • Comparing Project Complexity across Different Industry Sectors
    Bosch-Rekveldt, M.; Bakker, H.; Hertogh, M.
  • Complexity of megaprojects
    Brockmann, C.; Girmscheid, G.
  • A framework for examining the dimensions and characteristics of complexity inherent within rail megaprojects
    Chapman, R.J.
  • Insights into collaboration at the project level: complexity, social interaction and procurement mechanisms
    Cicmil, S.; Marshall, D.
  • Rethinking project management: researching the actuality of projects
    Cicmil, S.; Williams, T.; Thomas, J.; Hodgson, D.
  • We're not in Kansas anymore, Toto: mapping the strange landscape of complexity theory, and its relationship to project management
    Cooke-Davies, T.; Cicmil, S.; Crawford, L.; Richardson, K.
  • Complexity, uncertainty and mental models: from a paradigm of regulation to a paradigm of emergence in project management
    Daniel, P.A.; Daniel, C.
  • Exploring and assessing project complexity
    Dao, B.; Kermanshachi, S.; Shane, J.; Anderson, S.; Hare, E.
  • Revisiting project complexity: a new dimension and framework
    De Rezende, L.B.; Blackwell, P.
  • Managing complex projects in the infrastructure sector—a structural equation model for flexibility-focused project management
    Eriksson, P.E.; Larsson, J.; Pesämaa, O.
  • On faith, fact, and interaction in projects
    Geraldi, J.G.; Adlbrecht, G.
  • Now, let's make it really complex (complicated) A systematic review of the complexities of projects
    Geraldi, J.; Maylor, H.; Williams, T.
  • Measuring the complexity of mega construction projects in China—a fuzzy analytic network process analysis
    He, Q.; Luo, L.; Hu, Y.; Chan, A.P.
  • Addressing wicked problems in a range of project types
    Ireland, V.; Rapaport, B.; Omarova, A.
  • Development of a project complexity assessment method for energy megaprojects
    Kian Manesh Rad, E.
  • An empirical study into identifying project complexity management strategies
    Kermanshachi, S.; Dao, B.; Shane, J.; Anderson, S.
  • Profiling project complexity: insights from complexity science and project management literature
    Kiridena, S.; Sense, A.
  • The phi coefficient as an index of ear differences in dichotic listening
    Kuhn, G.M.
  • Context-adaptive agility: managing complexity and uncertainty
    Little, T.J.I.S.
  • Measurement model of project complexity for large-scale projects from task and organization perspective
    Lu, L.; Luo, L.; Wang, H.; Le, Y.; Shi, Q.
  • Limits of traditional project management approaches when facing complexity
    Marle, F.; Vidal, L.-A.
  • The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance
    Mathieu, J.E.; Heffner, T.S.; Goodwin, G.F.; Salas, E.; Cannon-Bowers, J.A.
  • Managerial complexity in project-based operations: a grounded model and its implications for practice
    Maylor, H.; Vidgen, R.; Carver, S.
  • How hard can it be?: actively managing complexity in technology projects
    Maylor, H.R.; Turner, N.W.; Murray-Webster, R.
  • The complex project complexity–identification of five ideal research types
    Mikkelsen, M.F.
  • The relationship between customer collaboration and software project overruns
    Molokken-Ostvold, K.; Furulund, K.M.
  • Relationships between leadership and success in different types of project complexities
    Müller, R.; Geraldi, J.; Turner, J.R.
  • Quantifying the complexity of transportation projects using the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process
    Nguyen, A.T.; Nguyen, L.D.; Le-Hoai, L.; Dang, C.N.
  • Performance measurement and management systems: a perspective from complexity theory
    Okwir, S.; Nudurupati, S.S.; Ginieis, M.; Angelis, J.
  • On uncertainty, ambiguity, and complexity in project management
    Pich, M.T.; Loch, C.H.; Meyer, A.d.
  • Perception: overview
    Pomerantz, J.R.
  • Analysing the organizational factors of project complexity using structural equation modelling
    Qureshi, S.M.; Kang, C.
  • A conceptual framework for tackling knowable unknown unknowns in project management
    Ramasesh, R.V.; Browning, T.R.
  • A model of project complexity: distinguishing dimensions of complexity from severity
    Remington, K.; Zolin, R.; Turner, R.
  • Perception, attribution, and judgment of others
    Saks, A.; Johns, G.
  • Human knowing and perceived complexity: implications for systems practice
    Schlindwein, S.L.; Ison, R.
  • A leader's framework for decision making
    Snowden, D.J.; Boone, M.E.
  • Does lean and agile project management help coping with project complexity?
    Sohi, A.J.; Hertogh, M.; Bosch-Rekveldt, M.; Blom, R.
  • Errors, lies and misunderstandings: systematic review on behavioural decision making in projects
    Stingl, V.; Geraldi, J.
  • SAS and SPSS macros to calculate standardized Cronbach's alpha using the upper bound of the phi coefficient for dichotomous items
    Sun, W.; Chou, C.P.; Stacy, A.W.; Ma, H.; Unger, J.; Gallaher, P.
  • Rethinking project management: a structured literature review with a critical look at the brave new world
    Svejvig, P.; Andersen, P.
  • Understanding project complexity: implications on project management
    Vidal, L.-A.; Marle, F.
  • Measuring project complexity using the analytic hierarchy process
    Vidal, L.A.; Marle, F.; Bocquet, J.-C.
  • Modelling project complexity
    Vidal, L.A.; Marle, F.; Bocquet, J.-C.
  • The need for new paradigms for complex projects
    Williams, T.M.
  • Identifying success factors in construction projects: a case study
    Williams, T.
  • Rethinking project management
    Winter, M.; Smith, C.
  • Grasping the complexity of IS development projects
    Xia, W.; Lee, G.
  • Discovering complexity and emergent properties in project systems: a new approach to understanding project performance
    Zhu, J.; Mostafavi, A.