Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
E. Thompson (2007)
Development and Validation of an Internationally Reliable Short-Form of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS)Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38
Yongxing Guo, Haiying Kang, Bo Shao, B. Halvorsen (2019)
Organizational politics as a blindfoldPersonnel Review
(2019)
An investigation on the dark side of benevolent authoritarian and its boundary condition: an uncertainty management theory perspective
Jinsong Li, Long-Zeng Wu, Dong Liu, H. Kwan, Jun Liu (2014)
Insiders maintain voice: A psychological safety model of organizational politicsAsia Pacific Journal of Management, 31
J. George, Jing Zhou (2007)
Dual Tuning in a Supportive Context: Joint Contributions of Positive Mood, Negative Mood, and Supervisory Behaviors to Employee CreativityAcademy of Management Journal, 50
B. Fredrickson (2001)
The role of positive emotions in positive psychology. The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions.The American psychologist, 56 3
R.S. Lazarus, S. Folkman (1984)
Stress, Appraisal, and Coping
Y. Liu, G.R. Ferris, D.C. Treadway, M.L. Prati, P.L. Perrewé, W.A. Hochwarter, E. Vigoda-Gadot, A. Drory (2006)
Handbook of Organizational Politics
J. Maslyn, Steven Farmer, Kenneth Bettenhausen (2017)
When organizational politics matters: The effects of the perceived frequency and distance of experienced politicsHuman Relations, 70
V. Pérez-Rodríguez, Gabriela Topa, Marina Beléndez (2019)
Organizational justice and work stress: The mediating role of negative, but not positive, emotionsPersonality and Individual Differences, 151
Xueli Zhu, Fang Wang, Yaoguo Geng (2021)
Machiavellianism on quality of life: The role of lifestyle, age, gender, social supportPersonality and Individual Differences, 173
Galit Meisler, A. Drory, E. Vigoda-Gadot (2019)
Perceived organizational politics and counterproductive work behaviorPersonnel Review
G. Ferris, B. Ellen, Charn McAllister, Liam Maher (2019)
Reorganizing Organizational Politics Research: A Review of the Literature and Identification of Future Research DirectionsAnnual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior
Jinyun Duan, Émilie Lapointe, Yue Xu, Sarah Brooks (2019)
Why do employees speak up? Examining the roles of LMX, perceived risk and perceived leader power in predicting voice behaviorJournal of Managerial Psychology
C. Farh, Zhijun Chen (2014)
Beyond the individual victim: multilevel consequences of abusive supervision in teams.The Journal of applied psychology, 99 6
Wayne Hochwarter, Christopher Rosen, Samantha Jordan, G. Ferris, Aqsa Ejaz, Liam Maher (2020)
Perceptions of Organizational Politics Research: Past, Present, and FutureJournal of Management, 46
Kathrin Boerner, Steven Mock (2012)
Impact of patient suffering on caregiver well-being: The case of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients and their caregiversPsychology, Health & Medicine, 17
M. Bashshur, B. Oc (2015)
When Voice MattersJournal of Management, 41
Tanguy Dulac, J. Coyle-Shapiro, David Henderson, Sandy Wayne (2008)
NOT ALL RESPONSES TO BREACH ARE THE SAME: THE INTERCONNECTION OF SOCIAL EXCHANGE AND PSYCHOLOGICAL CONTRACT PROCESSES IN ORGANIZATIONSAcademy of Management Journal, 51
E. Morrison (2014)
Employee Voice and Silence, 1
G. Ferris, D. Fedor, J. Chachere, L. Pondy (1989)
Myths and Politics in Organizational ContextsGroup & Organization Management, 14
R.W. Brislin, H.C. Triandis, J.W. Berry (1980)
Handbook of Cross-cultural Psychology
B. Ellen, Gerald Ferris, M. Buckley (2013)
Leader political support: Reconsidering leader political behavior ☆Leadership Quarterly, 24
Henry Mintzberg (1985)
THE ORGANIZATION AS POLITICAL ARENAJournal of Management Studies, 22
H.M. Weiss, R. Cropanzano, B.M. Staw, L.L. Cummings (1996)
Research in Organizational Behavior, 18
Rachel Kane-Frieder, Wayne Hochwarter, H. Hampton, G. Ferris (2014)
Supervisor political support as a buffer to subordinates' reactions to politics perceptions: A three-sample investigationCareer Development International, 19
Jinyun Duan, Yue Xu, Xiaotian Wang, Chia-huei Wu, Ying Wang (2020)
Voice for oneself: Self‐interested voice and its antecedents and consequencesJournal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
Jian Liang, C. Farh, J. Farh (2012)
Psychological Antecedents of Promotive and Prohibitive Voice: A Two-Wave ExaminationAcademy of Management Journal, 55
S. Bacharach, E. Lawler (1980)
Power and Politics in Organizations
Jeroen Camps, Stijn Decoster, J. Stouten (2012)
My Share Is Fair, So I Don’t Care: The Moderating Role of Distributive Justice in the Perception of Leaders’ Self-Serving BehaviorJournal of Personnel Psychology, 11
D. Watson, David Wiese, J. Vaidya, A. Tellegen (1999)
The two general activation systems of affect: Structural findings, evolutionary considerations, and psychobiological evidenceJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76
A. Brief, H. Weiss (2002)
Organizational behavior: affect in the workplace.Annual review of psychology, 53
Zinta Byrne, C. Kacmar, Jason Stoner, Wayne Hochwarter (2005)
The relationship between perceptions of politics and depressed mood at work: unique moderators across three levels.Journal of occupational health psychology, 10 4
Jingdong Liu, Ri-Hong You, Hao Liu, P. Chung (2020)
Chinese version of the international positive and negative affect schedule short form: factor structure and measurement invarianceHealth and Quality of Life Outcomes, 18
Wayne Hochwarter, C. Kacmar, P. Perrewé, D. Johnson (2003)
Perceived organizational support as a mediator of the relationship between politics perceptions and work outcomes.Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63
Eran Vigoda (2002)
Stress-related aftermaths to workplace politics: The relationships among politics, job distress, and aggressive behavior in organizations.Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23
J. Pfeffer (1981)
Power in Organizations
Hector Madrid (2020)
Emotion Regulation, Positive Affect, and Promotive Voice Behavior at WorkFrontiers in Psychology, 11
Chenwei Li, Jian Liang, J. Farh (2018)
Speaking Up When Water Is Murky: An Uncertainty-Based Model Linking Perceived Organizational Politics to Employee VoiceJournal of Management, 46
C. Chang, Christopher Rosen, P. Levy (2009)
The Relationship Between Perceptions of Organizational Politics and Employee Attitudes, Strain, and Behavior: A Meta-Analytic ExaminationAcademy of Management Journal, 52
Jason Dahling, Brian Whitaker, P. Levy (2009)
The Development and Validation of a New Machiavellianism ScaleJournal of Management, 35
N. Schwarz (2000)
Emotion, cognition, and decision makingCognition and Emotion, 14
P. Podsakoff, Scott MacKenzie, Jeong-Yeon Lee, Nathan Podsakoff (2003)
Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.The Journal of applied psychology, 88 5
Norbert Schwarz, G. Clore (2003)
Mood as Information: 20 Years LaterPsychological Inquiry, 14
Lois James, L. James (1989)
Integrating Work Environment Perceptions: Explorations into the Measurement of MeaningJournal of Applied Psychology, 74
Adopting an affective events perspective, our study investigates the relationship between perceived organizational politics (POP) and employee voice by exploring the mediating role of affect and the moderating role of supervisor political support.Design/methodology/approachThe hypothesized model was tested with three-wave data collected from 393 full-time employees.FindingsResults indicate that POP indirectly impacts employee voice through influencing positive and negative affect, and that supervisor political support moderates these indirect effects by moderating the relationship between POP and affective states.Research limitations/implicationsSurvey data can hardly test the causal relationship. Effect of employees' POP could be further examined in the lens subjective positive experiences. Organizational politics might have positive meanings.Practical implicationsOur findings show that POP brings employees negative feelings and reduces their voice behaviors while supervisor political support can mitigate this inhibiting effect. Therefore, managers should learn how to use political behavior more reasonably in highly political work environment.Originality/valueBy highlighting the possibility that employees can be beneficiaries having a vested interest in political environment and investigating the unexplored affective explanatory mechanisms underlying the POP–voice relationship, this study provides new directions for future research on POP and employee voice.
Journal of Managerial Psychology – Emerald Publishing
Published: Aug 29, 2024
Keywords: Employee voice; Perceived organizational politics; Affect; Supervisor political support
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.