Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S. Padel, C. Foster (2005)
Exploring the gap between attitudes and behaviour: understanding why consumers buy or do not buy organic foodBritish Food Journal, 107
United States Department of Agriculture
Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2005
M. Teisl, A. Levy, B. Derby (1999)
The Effects of Education and Information Source on Consumer Awareness of Diet–Disease RelationshipsJournal of Public Policy & Marketing, 18
S. Balasubramanian, Catherine Cole (2002)
Consumers' Search and Use of Nutrition Information: The Challenge and Promise of the Nutrition Labeling and Education ActJournal of Marketing, 66
Lab Business Week
Daily variety of fruits and vegetables reduce risk of chronic diseases
Ross Prentice, B. Caan, R. Chlebowski, Ruth Patterson, Lewis Kuller, Judith Ockene, K. Margolis, M. Limacher, J. Manson, Linda Parker, E. Paskett, L. Phillips, J. Robbins, J. Rossouw, Gloria Sarto, JamesM. Shikany, Marcia Stefanick, Cynthia Thomson, Linda Horn, Mara Vitolins, Jean Wactawski-Wende, Robert Wallace, S. Wassertheil-Smoller, Evelyn Whitlock, Katsuhiko Yano, Lucile Adams-Campbell, G. Anderson, A. Assaf, Shirley Beresford, Henry Black, Robert Brunner, R. Brzyski, Leslie Ford, M. Gass, J. Hays, D. Heber, G. Heiss, Susan Hendrix, J. Hsia, F. Hubbell, R. Jackson, Karen Johnson, J. Kotchen, Andrea LaCroix, Dorothy Lane, Robert Langer, N. Lasser, Maureen Henderson (2006)
Low-fat dietary pattern and risk of invasive breast cancer: the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Controlled Dietary Modification Trial.JAMA, 295 6
J.T. Spence
Is your health what you eat?
P. Ippolito, A. Mathios (1994)
Nutrition information and policy: A study of U.S. food production trendsJournal of Consumer Policy, 17
W. Mueller
Who reads the label?
A.S. Levy, R.C. Stokes
Effects of health promotion advertising campaigns on sales of ready‐to‐eat cereals
P. Guenther, K. Dodd, J. Reedy, S. Krebs-Smith (2006)
Most Americans eat much less than recommended amounts of fruits and vegetables.Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 106 9
B. Orme
Interpreting Conjoint Analysis Data
R. Nayga, D. Lipiński, N. Savur (1998)
Consumers' Use of Nutritional Labels While Food Shopping and At HomeJournal of Consumer Affairs, 32
Scot Burton, J. Andrews (1996)
Age, Product Nutrition, and Label Format Effects on Consumer Perceptions and Product EvaluationsJournal of Consumer Affairs, 30
Anna-Sigrid Keck, J. Finley (2004)
Cruciferous Vegetables: Cancer Protective Mechanisms of Glucosinolate Hydrolysis Products and SeleniumIntegrative Cancer Therapies, 3
S.A. Beresford
Low‐fat dietary pattern and risk of colorectal cancer: the women's health initiative randomized controlled dietary modification trial
C. Andrews, R. Netemeyer, Scot Burton (1998)
Consumer Generalization of Nutrient Content Claims in AdvertisingJournal of Marketing, 62
M. Marquis (2005)
Exploring convenience orientation as a food motivation for college students living in residence hallsInternational Journal of Consumer Studies, 29
E. Mojduszka, J. Caswell, J. Harris (2001)
Consumer choice of food products and the implications for price competition and government policyAgribusiness, 17
M. Mazis, M. Raymond (1997)
Consumer Perceptions of Health Claims in Advertisements and on Food LabelsJournal of Consumer Affairs, 31
Catherine Cole, S. Balasubramanian (1993)
Age differences in consumers' search for information: Public policy implications.Journal of Consumer Research, 20
W. Howard (2007)
Low-Fat Dietary Pattern and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: The Women's Health Initiative Randomized Controlled Dietary Modification TrialYearbook of Endocrinology, 2007
M. Chase
Lost in fat city: studies stir confusion over butter and oils
E. Ha, N. Caine-Bish (2009)
Effect of nutrition intervention using a general nutrition course for promoting fruit and vegetable consumption among college students.Journal of nutrition education and behavior, 41 2
James Anderson, Belinda Smith, N. Gustafson (1994)
Health benefits and practical aspects of high-fiber diets.The American journal of clinical nutrition, 59 5 Suppl
C. Moorman (1990)
The Effects of Stimulus and Consumer Characteristics on the Utilization of Nutrition InformationJournal of Consumer Research, 17
S. Padel, C. Foster
Exploring the gap between attitudes and behavior
R. Mayer, D. Scammon, L. Golodner (1993)
Healthy Confusion for ConsumersJournal of Public Policy & Marketing, 12
Ross Prentice, B. Caan, R. Chlebowski, Ruth, Patterson, L. Kuller, J. Ockene, L. Karen, Margolis, M. Limacher, J. Manson, M. Linda, Parker, E. Paskett, L. Phillips, J. Robbins, J. Rossouw, E. Gloria, Sarto, J. Shikany, M. Stefanick, A. Cynthia, Thomson, L. Horn, M. Vitolins, Jean, Wactawski-Wende, Robert Wallace, Sylvia, Wassertheil-Smoller, Evelyn, Whitlock, K. Yano, L. Adams-Campbell, G. Anderson, R. Annlouise, Assaf, S. Beresford, Henry Black, L. Robert, Brunner, R. Brzyski, L. Ford, M. Gass, J. Hays, D. Heber, G. Heiss, S. Hendrix, J. Hsia, F. Hubbell, R. Jackson, C. Karen, Johnson, J. Kotchen, Andrea LaCroix, S. Dorothy, Lane, R. Langer, N. Lasser, M. Maureen, Henderson
The Women’s Health Initiative Randomized Controlled Dietary Modification Trial
R. Gardyn
What's cooking
FMI Research & Prevention‐Rodale
Insights on whole grain
T. Tyebjee (1979)
Affirmative Disclosure of Nutrition Information and Consumers' Food Preferences: A ReviewJournal of Consumer Affairs, 13
A. Drichoutis, P. Lazaridis, R. Nayga (2006)
Consumers' Use of Nutritional Labels: A Review of Research Studies and Issues
Purpose – The purpose of this research is to investigate the relative importance to consumers of different health benefits of food. Design/methodology/approach – This study uses conjoint analysis to investigate the relative importance of five health benefits to consumers in their intention to buy a food. Findings – The results suggest that the single most important health benefit influencing purchase intentions is high nutritional value. If two health benefits are to be promoted, for the total sample the most effective combination would be high nutritional value and the potential to reduce cancer, followed by high nutritional value and proven to reduce the risk of heart disease. However, for those respondents with less than a college education, the most effective combination would be high nutritional value and the potential to reduce arthritis. Research limitations/implications – The sample size is small – 238 respondents. Practical implications – The results can be used to help food marketers offer and promote health benefits of their products. Social implications – More effective marketing of health benefits of foods should increase consumption of healthy foods, which will enhance consumer welfare. Originality/value – Conjoint analysis has not previously been used in studies of this topic. The advantage of conjoint analysis over other analytical techniques is that it incorporates realistic trade‐offs when measuring consumer preferences.
Journal of Consumer Marketing – Emerald Publishing
Published: Sep 13, 2011
Keywords: Food marketing; Health benefits; Food promotion; Conjoint analysis; Nutrition; Consumers; United States of America
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.