Patients' complaints at a large psychiatric hospital: can they lead to better patient services?

Patients' complaints at a large psychiatric hospital: can they lead to better patient services? Purpose – Little is known about complaints made by psychiatric patients. The aim of this study is to analyse complaints made by, or behalf of, inpatients at a large independent psychiatric hospital. Design/methodology/approach – The hospital's complaints register was used to identify and study complaints made during 2006. A descriptive analysis was performed. Findings – Of the 392 complaints, 39 per cent related to staff behaviour, 26 per cent to clinical matters, 18 per cent to the behaviour of other patients and the remaining 16 per cent to the physical environment and facilities. Action as a result of complaints was mainly taken at unit level but in 9 per cent of cases organisation‐wide improvements were made, for example to enrich patient treatment programmes, rectify staff shortages and improve the quality of meals. Research limitations/implications – The study took place in a specialist hospital and so the findings cannot be generalised to the wider NHS. Important differences exist between complaints made in psychiatric as opposed to general hospital settings. Practical implications – Complaints are a valuable source of organisational learning for mental health services. Originality/value – Given the paucity of literature on complaints in psychiatry, this study describes some in detail the nature of patients' complaints and one organisation's actions to improve patient services as a result of these complaints. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance Emerald Publishing

Patients' complaints at a large psychiatric hospital: can they lead to better patient services?

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/patients-complaints-at-a-large-psychiatric-hospital-can-they-lead-to-eeu04iIznO
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2010 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
0952-6862
DOI
10.1108/09526861011037452
pmid
20535908
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – Little is known about complaints made by psychiatric patients. The aim of this study is to analyse complaints made by, or behalf of, inpatients at a large independent psychiatric hospital. Design/methodology/approach – The hospital's complaints register was used to identify and study complaints made during 2006. A descriptive analysis was performed. Findings – Of the 392 complaints, 39 per cent related to staff behaviour, 26 per cent to clinical matters, 18 per cent to the behaviour of other patients and the remaining 16 per cent to the physical environment and facilities. Action as a result of complaints was mainly taken at unit level but in 9 per cent of cases organisation‐wide improvements were made, for example to enrich patient treatment programmes, rectify staff shortages and improve the quality of meals. Research limitations/implications – The study took place in a specialist hospital and so the findings cannot be generalised to the wider NHS. Important differences exist between complaints made in psychiatric as opposed to general hospital settings. Practical implications – Complaints are a valuable source of organisational learning for mental health services. Originality/value – Given the paucity of literature on complaints in psychiatry, this study describes some in detail the nature of patients' complaints and one organisation's actions to improve patient services as a result of these complaints.

Journal

International Journal of Health Care Quality AssuranceEmerald Publishing

Published: May 4, 2010

Keywords: Customer satisfaction; Patients; Complaints; Mental hospitals; Mental health services; United Kingdom

References

  • A 22 month study of patient complaints at a National Health Service hospital
    Siyambalapitiya, S.; Caunt, J.; Harrison, N.; White, L.; Weremczuk, D.; Fernando, D.J.S.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create folders to
organize your research

Export folders, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off