Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Patient involvement in quality management: rationale and current status

Patient involvement in quality management: rationale and current status Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to review how patient and public involvement (PPI) can contribute to quality improvement functions and describe the levels of PPI in quality improvement functions at hospital and departmental level in a sample of European hospitals. Design/methodology/approach – Literature review and cross-sectional study. Findings – PPI takes multiple forms in health care and there is not a single strategy or method that can be considered to reflect best practice. The literature reveals that PPI can serve important functions to support quality improvement efforts. In contrast, the assessment of actual PPI in quality improvement shows that PPI is low. Research limitations/implications – Findings are not representative of hospitals in the EU. Practical implications – A diverse set of methods and tools that can be employed to realize PPI. Service providers should consider PPI at all stages, in particular in setting quality standards and criteria and in evaluating the results. Originality/value – Contextualization of empirical findings with case studies from the literature that inform further practice and research on PPI. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Health Organization and Management Emerald Publishing

Patient involvement in quality management: rationale and current status

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/patient-involvement-in-quality-management-rationale-and-current-status-rzGFoyZIiR
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © Emerald Group Publishing Limited
ISSN
1477-7266
DOI
10.1108/JHOM-07-2014-0122
pmid
26222876
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to review how patient and public involvement (PPI) can contribute to quality improvement functions and describe the levels of PPI in quality improvement functions at hospital and departmental level in a sample of European hospitals. Design/methodology/approach – Literature review and cross-sectional study. Findings – PPI takes multiple forms in health care and there is not a single strategy or method that can be considered to reflect best practice. The literature reveals that PPI can serve important functions to support quality improvement efforts. In contrast, the assessment of actual PPI in quality improvement shows that PPI is low. Research limitations/implications – Findings are not representative of hospitals in the EU. Practical implications – A diverse set of methods and tools that can be employed to realize PPI. Service providers should consider PPI at all stages, in particular in setting quality standards and criteria and in evaluating the results. Originality/value – Contextualization of empirical findings with case studies from the literature that inform further practice and research on PPI.

Journal

Journal of Health Organization and ManagementEmerald Publishing

Published: Aug 17, 2015

There are no references for this article.