Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Chris Dent, P. Jensen, Sophie Waller, B. Webster (2006)
Research Use of Patented Knowledge: A Review
B. Pottelsberghe, D. Guellec (2007)
The Economics of the European Patent System: IP Policy for Innovation and Competition
B. Pottelsberghe (2007)
Hot ‘Patent’ Issues: Quantitative Evidence
B. Godin (1998)
Writing Performative History:Social Studies of Science, 28
(2001)
Commercializing Knowledge: University Science, Knowledge Capture, and Firm Performance in Biotechnology
B. Sampat, D. Mowery, Arvids Ziedonis (2003)
Changes in university patent quality after the Bayh-Dole act: a re-examinationInternational Journal of Industrial Organization, 21
D. Mowery, Arvids Ziedonis (2002)
Academic patent quality and quantity before and after the Bayh-Dole act in the United StatesResearch Policy, 31
R. Merges, R. Nelson (1990)
On the Complex Economics of Patent ScopeColumbia Law Review, 90
Bart Looy, J. Callaert, K. Debackere (2006)
Publication and Patent Behaviour of Academic Researchers: Conflicting, Reinforcing or Merely Co-Existing?
M. Reitzig (2004)
Strategic Management of Intellectual PropertyMIT Sloan Management Review, 45
D. Blumenthal, E. Campbell, N. Causino, K. Louis (1996)
Participation of life-science faculty in research relationships with industry.The New England journal of medicine, 335 23
Stefano Breschi, F. Lissoni, F. Montobbio (2006)
Open Science and University Patenting: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Italian Case
L. Zucker, M. Darby (1996)
Star scientists and institutional transformation: patterns of invention and innovation in the formation of the biotechnology industry.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 93 23
A. Mathieu, M. Meyer, B. Potterie (2008)
Turning science into business: A case study of a major European research universityScience and Public Policy, 35
A. Geuna (2001)
The Changing Rationale for European University Research Funding: Are There Negative Unintended Consequences?Journal of Economic Issues, 35
D. Mowery, R. Nelson, B. Sampat, Arvids Ziedonis (2001)
The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh–Dole act of 1980Research Policy, 30
Elefthérios Sapsalis, Bruno Potterie (2007)
THE INSTITUTIONAL SOURCES OF KNOWLEDGE AND THE VALUE OF ACADEMIC PATENTSEconomics of Innovation and New Technology, 16
R. Henderson, A. Jaffe, M. Trajtenberg (1995)
Universities as a Source of Commercial Technology: A Detailed Analysis of University Patenting, 19651988Review of Economics and Statistics, 80
Elefthérios Sapsalis, B. Pottelsberghe (2003)
Insight into the patenting performance of Belgian universitiesBrussels economic review, 46
A. Geuna, L. Nesta (2003)
University Patenting and its Effects on Academic ResearchIntellectual Property Law eJournal
A. Geuna, L. Nesta (2006)
University patenting and its effects on academic research: The emerging European evidenceResearch Policy, 35
Donald Stokes (1997)
Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation
Sarina Saragossi, Bruno Potterie (2003)
What Patent Data Reveal about Universities: The Case of BelgiumThe Journal of Technology Transfer, 28
M. Meyer (2003)
Academic patents as an indicator of useful research? A new approach to measure academic inventivenessResearch Evaluation, 12
(2005)
Do Formal Intellectual Property Rights Hinder the Free Flow of Scientific Knowledge? An Empirical Test of the Anti-Commons Hypothesis
(2002)
Who Is Selling the Ivory Tower? Sources of Growth in University Licensing
S. Rosenberg (1996)
Secrecy in medical research.The New England journal of medicine, 334 6
D. Guellec, B. Pottelsberghe, N. Zeebroeck (2007)
Patent as a market instrumentULB Institutional Repository
Magnus Gulbrandsen, Jens-Christian Smeby (2005)
Industry funding and university professors' research performanceResearch Policy, 34
Pierre Azoulay, Waverly Ding (2006)
NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES THE IMPACT OF ACADEMIC PATENTING ON THE RATE , QUALITY , AND DIRECTION OF ( PUBLIC ) RESEARCH
E. Barash (1997)
Experimental Uses, Patents, and Scientific ProgressNorthwestern University Law Review, 91
James Bessen, M. Meurer (2005)
The Patent Litigation ExplosionIntellectual Property Law eJournal
Elefthérios Sapsalis, B. Potterie (2003)
The Sources of Knowledge and the Value of Academic Patents
M. Heller, R. Eisenberg (1998)
Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical ResearchIntellectual Property Law eJournal
R. Nelson (2004)
The market economy, and the scientific commonsResearch Policy, 33
J. Cohen (1995)
Share and share alike isn't always the rule in science.Science, 268 5218
M. Trajtenberg, R. Henderson, A. Jaffe (1997)
University Versus Corporate Patents: A Window On The Basicness Of InventionEconomics of Innovation and New Technology, 5
E. Campbell, J. Weissman, N. Causino, D. Blumenthal (2000)
Data withholding in academic medicine: characteristics of faculty denied access to research results and biomaterialsResearch Policy, 29
A. Agrawal, R. Henderson (2002)
Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Putting Patents in Context: Exploring Knowledge Transfer from MITManag. Sci., 48
A. Agrawal, R. Henderson
Putting patents in context: exploring knowledge transfer from MIT
Elefthérios Sapsalis, B. Potterie, R. Navon (2006)
Academic versus industry patenting: An in-depth analysis of what determines patent valueResearch Policy, 35
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to look at the sharp increase in academic patenting over the past 20 years and to raise important issues regarding the generation and diffusion of academic knowledge. Three key questions may be raised in this respect: What is behind the surge in academic patenting? Does patenting affect the quality and quantity of universities' scientific output? Does the patent system limit the freedom to perform academic research? The present paper seeks to summarize the existing literature on these issues. Design/methodology/approach – The paper's approach is a review of the recent literature on academic patenting and research use of patented inventions, complemented with critical viewpoints and new data on academic patenting in Europe. Findings – The evidence suggests that academic patenting has only limited effects on the direction, pace and quality of research. A virtuous cycle seems to characterise the patent‐publication relationship. Secondly, scientific anti‐commons show very little effects on academic researchers so far, limited to a few countries with weak or no research exemption regulations. In summary, the evidence leads the authors to conclude that the benefits of academic patenting on research exceed their potential negative effects. Originality/value – The paper offers a critical overview of the available evidence on the links between patents and academic research, which may be useful both for individuals unfamiliar with this issue or for those experienced in the field who are looking for a state of the art discussion on recent debates.
Journal of Intellectual Capital – Emerald Publishing
Published: Apr 18, 2008
Keywords: Patents; Research; Modern history; Universities
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.