Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Partnership paradoxes A case study of an energy company

Partnership paradoxes A case study of an energy company This paper presents the findings of a case study undertaken in a UK utility company, referred to as Energy Co. The main aim of the study was to assess how the agreement of a partnership arrangement in 1995 had affected the conduct of employment relations. The study found that partnership was born out of a poor industrial relations climate, and driven primarily by management. They hoped that it might improve industrial relations, raise employee commitment, inform and educate the workforce, and increase employee contribution. Partnership was not intended to encourage joint governance or power sharing. In practice, partnership combined direct employment involvement (EI) such as team briefing and problem solving groups, with representative participation through a formal partnership council system. Management suggested that, on balance, partnership had been successful, with benefits including improved industrial relations, quicker pay negotiations and increased legitimacy of decision making. It was also suggested that there was a positive link – albeit indirect and intangible – with organisational performance. Union representatives also proposed that partnership was a success, citing benefits including greater access to information, greater influence, inter‐union co‐operation, and more local decision making. Employee views were more mixed. There was also clear evidence of several tensions. Four were particularly noteworthy: employee apathy, management‐representative relations, employee‐representative relations, and the role of full‐time union officials (FTOs). Despite espoused partnership, management hostility to unions was evident, and a preference for non‐union employment relations clear. Consequently, the future of the partnership in its current form is uncertain. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Employee Relations: An International Journal Emerald Publishing

Partnership paradoxes A case study of an energy company

Download PDF
24 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/partnership-paradoxes-a-case-study-of-an-energy-company-ZAVano96Q8
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
0142-5455
DOI
10.1108/01425450410544470
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This paper presents the findings of a case study undertaken in a UK utility company, referred to as Energy Co. The main aim of the study was to assess how the agreement of a partnership arrangement in 1995 had affected the conduct of employment relations. The study found that partnership was born out of a poor industrial relations climate, and driven primarily by management. They hoped that it might improve industrial relations, raise employee commitment, inform and educate the workforce, and increase employee contribution. Partnership was not intended to encourage joint governance or power sharing. In practice, partnership combined direct employment involvement (EI) such as team briefing and problem solving groups, with representative participation through a formal partnership council system. Management suggested that, on balance, partnership had been successful, with benefits including improved industrial relations, quicker pay negotiations and increased legitimacy of decision making. It was also suggested that there was a positive link – albeit indirect and intangible – with organisational performance. Union representatives also proposed that partnership was a success, citing benefits including greater access to information, greater influence, inter‐union co‐operation, and more local decision making. Employee views were more mixed. There was also clear evidence of several tensions. Four were particularly noteworthy: employee apathy, management‐representative relations, employee‐representative relations, and the role of full‐time union officials (FTOs). Despite espoused partnership, management hostility to unions was evident, and a preference for non‐union employment relations clear. Consequently, the future of the partnership in its current form is uncertain.

Journal

Employee Relations: An International Journal – Emerald Publishing

Published: Aug 1, 2004

Keywords: Partnership; Trade unions; Case studies; Industrial relations

References

  • Reframing employment relations: the case for neo‐pluralism
    Ackers, P.
  • British trade unions and social partnership: rhetoric, reality and strategy
    Ackers, P.; Payne, J.
  • Partnership and voice, with or without trade unions: changing British management approaches to participation
    Ackers, P.; Marchington, M.; Wilkinson, A.; Dundon, T.
  • Employee relations
    Bacon, N.
  • New employee relations strategies in Britain: towards individualism or partnership?
    Bacon, N.; Storey, J.
  • The promotion and prospects of partnership at Inland Revenue
    Beale, D.
  • Strategy and trade union effectiveness in a neo‐liberal environment
    Boxall, P.; Haynes, P.
  • Putting partnership into practice in Britain
    Brown, W.
  • Problematising partnership: the prospects for a co‐operative bargaining agenda
    Claydon, T.
  • Human Resource Management: The New Agenda
    Coupar, W.; Stevens, S.
  • Britain at Work as Depicted by the 1998 Workplace Employee Relations Survey
    Cully, M.; O'Reilly, A.; Woodland, S.; Dix, G.