Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You and Your Team.

Learn More →

Paradoxical tensions in open innovation networks

Paradoxical tensions in open innovation networks Purpose – This paper aims to advance the paradox management perspective by applying it to open innovation networks in Finland and argues that paradox management is an important explicit logic to consider in the management of open innovation. Design/methodology approach – Interviews sought the views of diverse network participants, including companies, universities, and government agencies. Findings – The open innovation networks exhibited many of the same tensions discussed in innovation initiatives within organizations, but additional complexities arose from both internal and external factors. Research limitations/implications – The study examined open innovation networks when the collaboration in the networks was still in early phases. Thus, the study does not capture the paradoxes, underlying tensions, and management approaches as they change in later phases. Practical implications – The open innovation networks require the ability to excel in managing a set of paradoxical tensions using a complex repertoire of approaches. Open innovation can be seen as an important way to create dynamicity and change, and if managers are able to manage tensions using a complex set of behavioral approaches, they can more likely achieve increased innovation. Originality/value – The open innovation literature recognizes paradoxes but does not address their management directly. This paper deepens the understanding of paradoxical tensions and their management across open innovation networks that take the form of public‐private partnerships. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png European Journal of Innovation Management Emerald Publishing

Paradoxical tensions in open innovation networks

Download PDF
28 pages
Read Article

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/paradoxical-tensions-in-open-innovation-networks-uDaTOeTTrh
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
1460-1060
DOI
10.1108/14601061111174943
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – This paper aims to advance the paradox management perspective by applying it to open innovation networks in Finland and argues that paradox management is an important explicit logic to consider in the management of open innovation. Design/methodology approach – Interviews sought the views of diverse network participants, including companies, universities, and government agencies. Findings – The open innovation networks exhibited many of the same tensions discussed in innovation initiatives within organizations, but additional complexities arose from both internal and external factors. Research limitations/implications – The study examined open innovation networks when the collaboration in the networks was still in early phases. Thus, the study does not capture the paradoxes, underlying tensions, and management approaches as they change in later phases. Practical implications – The open innovation networks require the ability to excel in managing a set of paradoxical tensions using a complex repertoire of approaches. Open innovation can be seen as an important way to create dynamicity and change, and if managers are able to manage tensions using a complex set of behavioral approaches, they can more likely achieve increased innovation. Originality/value – The open innovation literature recognizes paradoxes but does not address their management directly. This paper deepens the understanding of paradoxical tensions and their management across open innovation networks that take the form of public‐private partnerships.

Journal

European Journal of Innovation Management – Emerald Publishing

Published: Oct 4, 2011

Keywords: Open innovation; Innovation networks; Paradox management; Tensions; Innovation; Finland

References

  • Does IP strategy have to cripple open innovation?
    Alexy, O.; Criscuolo, P.; Salter, A.
  • Open versus closed innovation: a model of discovery and divergence
    Almirall, E.; Casadesus‐Masanell, R.
  • Exploitation‐exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: managing paradoxes and innovation
    Andriopoulos, C.; Lewis, M.W.
  • Winning legally: the value of legal astuteness
    Bagley, C.E.
  • The role of narratives in sustaining organizational innovation
    Bartel, C.A.; Garud, R.
  • Paradox of corporate entrepreneurship
    Birkinshaw, J.
  • Organizational paradoxes: dynamic shifting and integrative management
    Bloodgood, J.M.; Chae, B.K.
  • The art of continuous change: linking complexity theory and time‐paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations
    Brown, S.L.; Eisenhardt, K.M.
  • Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology
    Chesbrough, H.W.
  • How open innovation can help you cope in lean times
    Chesbrough, H.W.; Garman, A.R.
  • The Innovator's Solution: Creating and Sustaining Successful Growth
    Christensen, C.M.; Raynor, M.E.
  • The industrial dynamics of open innovation – evidence from the transformation of consumer electronics
    Christensen, J.F.; Olesen, H.M.; Kjaer, J.S.
  • Basics of Qualitative Research
    Corbin, J.; Strauss, A.
  • Design and the management of multi‐institutional research collaborations: theoretical implications from two case studies
    Corley, E.A.; Boardman, P.C.; Bozeman, B.
  • How open is innovation?
    Dahlander, L.; Gann, D.M.
  • Neither market nor hierarchy nor network: the emergence of bazaar governance
    Demil, B.; Lecocq, X.
  • Paradox and performance: toward a theory of behavioral complexity in managerial leadership
    Demison, D.R.; Hooijberg, R.; Quinn, R.E.
  • The role of technology in the shift towards open innovation: the case of Procter and Gamble
    Dodgson, M.; Gann, D.; Salter, A.
  • Sustained product innovation in large, mature organizations: overcoming innovation‐to‐organization problems
    Dougherty, D.
  • Organizing for innovation in the twenty‐first century
    Dougherty, D.
  • Paradox, spirals, ambivalence: the new language of change and pluralism
    Eisenhardt, K.M.
  • Knowledge collaboration in online communities
    Faraj, S.; Järvenpäa, S.L.; Majchrzak, A.
  • Capitalizing on paradox: the role of language in transforming organizational identities
    Fiol, C.M.
  • Opening up the innovation process: towards an agenda
    Gassman, O.
  • Fostering team innovation: why is it important to combine opposing action strategies?
    Gebert, D.; Boerner, S.; Kearney, E.
  • The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity
    Gibson, C.R.; Birkinshaw, J.
  • Empirical evidence regarding the tension between knowledge sharing and knowledge expropriation in collaborations
    Heiman, B.A.; Nickerson, J.A.
  • The Innovation Marathon: Lessons from High Technology Firms
    Jelinek, M.; Schoonhoven, C.
  • Managing strategic alliances: what do we know now, and where do we go from here?
    Kale, P.; Singh, H.
  • Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: building relational capital
    Kale, P.; Singh, H.; Perlmutter, H.
  • Trust‐opportunism paradox, relationalism, and performance in interfirm relationships: evidence from the retail industry
    Lado, A.A.; Dant, R.R.; Tekleab, A.G.
  • Open for innovation: the role of opennesss in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms
    Laursen, K.; Salter, A.
  • Trust and distrust: new relationships and realities
    Lewicki, R.J.; McAllister, D.J.; Bies, R.J.
  • When Cultures Collide
    Lewis, R.
  • Exploring paradox: toward a more comprehensive guide
    Lewis, M.W.
  • Ambidexterity and performance in small to medium‐sized firms: the pivotal role of top management team behavior integration
    Lubatkin, M.H.; Simsek, Z.; Ling, Y.; Veiga, J.F.
  • Organizational change and managerial sensemaking: working through paradox
    Luscher, L.S.; Lewis, M.W.
  • Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning
    March, J.G.
  • The governance of free/open source software projects: monolithic, multidimensional, or configurational?
    Markus, M.L.
  • Towards Demand Based Innovation Policy
    Nikulainen, T.; Tahvanainen, A‐J.
  • Bounding organizations: enabling coordination among unexpected allies
    O'Mahony, S.; Bechky, A.
  • Using paradox to build management and organization theories
    Poole, M.S.; Van de Ven, A.H.
  • Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology
    Powell, W.W.; Koput, K.W.; Smith‐Doerr, L.
  • Managing innovation networks: exploratory evidence from ICT, biotechnology and nanotechnology networks
    Rampersad, G.; Quester, P.; Troshani, I.
  • Centrifugal and centripetal forces in radical new product development under time pressure
    Sheremata, W.A.
  • Managing strategic contradictions: a top management model for managing information streams
    Smith, W.K.; Tushman, M.L.
  • Community of firms: a new collaborative paradigm for open innovation and an analysis of Blade.org
    Snow, C.C.; Strauss, D.R.; Culpeen, R.
  • Superman or the Fantastic Four? Knowledge combination and experience in innovative teams
    Taylor, A.; Greve, H.R.
  • Organizational evolution: a metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation
    Tushman, M.; Romanelli, E.
  • Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: the paradox of embeddedness
    Uzzi, B.
  • The promise of research on open source software
    Von Krogh, G.; Von Hippel, E.
  • How open is open enough? Melding proprietary and open source platform strategies
    West, J.
  • Challenges of open innovation: the paradox of firm investment in open‐source software
    West, J.; Gallagher, S.
  • The role of participation architecture in growing sponsored open source communities
    West, J.; O'Mahony, S.
  • The Economic Institutions of Capitalism
    Williamson, O.E.
  • Case Study Research: Design and Methods
    Yin, R.K.