Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Ownership identity and corporate donations: evidence from a natural experiment in China

Ownership identity and corporate donations: evidence from a natural experiment in China Taking advantage of the 2008 Sichuan Great Earthquake as a natural experiment, the purpose of this paper is to examine the motives and effects of corporate donations by focusing on how firm ownership identity as the first-order governance mechanism affects the motives and effects of disaster relief donations.Design/methodology/approachThe authors conduct regressions and market event studies, and use matching to address the confounding effects of differences in firm characteristics.FindingsThe authors hypothesize that private firms that are better governed than state-owned enterprises (SOEs) are more likely to donate for value maximization. Consistent with this, the authors find that private firms are more likely to donate to the 2008 Sichuan earthquake and donate more than SOEs. The effects of secondary governance variables in the donation determinant models (e.g. board independence and managerial ownership) are more consistent with the value maximization argument. While short-term market reaction to donation announcement is not significant for private firms, it is lower when SOEs make a large donation. Consistent with the hypothesis, the authors find that over the 24–36 months following the donation, private donors realize a higher abnormal stock return.Research limitations/implicationsThe study contributes to the debate over the merits/costs of corporate donations and helps better understand how SOEs and private firms (particularly family-owned firms) differ in their governance and financial decision-making.Practical implicationsBoth managers from private firms and SOEs can use the findings of this study to better guide their donation and other philanthropic decisions.Originality/valueThis study is the first to examine both the motives and effects of corporate donations by both private and SOEs taking advantage of the 2008 Sichuan, thereby significantly extending prior related studies. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png China Finance Review International Emerald Publishing

Ownership identity and corporate donations: evidence from a natural experiment in China

Download PDF
30 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/ownership-identity-and-corporate-donations-evidence-from-a-natural-15R3NEQAP6
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
2044-1398
DOI
10.1108/cfri-11-2019-0154
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Taking advantage of the 2008 Sichuan Great Earthquake as a natural experiment, the purpose of this paper is to examine the motives and effects of corporate donations by focusing on how firm ownership identity as the first-order governance mechanism affects the motives and effects of disaster relief donations.Design/methodology/approachThe authors conduct regressions and market event studies, and use matching to address the confounding effects of differences in firm characteristics.FindingsThe authors hypothesize that private firms that are better governed than state-owned enterprises (SOEs) are more likely to donate for value maximization. Consistent with this, the authors find that private firms are more likely to donate to the 2008 Sichuan earthquake and donate more than SOEs. The effects of secondary governance variables in the donation determinant models (e.g. board independence and managerial ownership) are more consistent with the value maximization argument. While short-term market reaction to donation announcement is not significant for private firms, it is lower when SOEs make a large donation. Consistent with the hypothesis, the authors find that over the 24–36 months following the donation, private donors realize a higher abnormal stock return.Research limitations/implicationsThe study contributes to the debate over the merits/costs of corporate donations and helps better understand how SOEs and private firms (particularly family-owned firms) differ in their governance and financial decision-making.Practical implicationsBoth managers from private firms and SOEs can use the findings of this study to better guide their donation and other philanthropic decisions.Originality/valueThis study is the first to examine both the motives and effects of corporate donations by both private and SOEs taking advantage of the 2008 Sichuan, thereby significantly extending prior related studies.

Journal

China Finance Review International – Emerald Publishing

Published: Mar 23, 2020

Keywords: China; Donation; Philanthropy; SOE; Sichuan earthquake; G32; G34

References

  • Large sample properties of matching estimators for average treatment effects
    Abadie, A.; Imbens, G.W.
  • Implementing matching estimators for average treatment effects in Stata
    Abadie, A.; Drukker, D.; Herr, J.L.; Imbens, G.W.
  • An analysis of corporate donations: United Kingdom evidence
    Adams, M.B.
  • Corporate political contributions: investment or agency
    Aggarwal, R.K.; Meschke, F.; Wang, T.
  • Corporate debt maturity and the real effects of the 2007 credit crisis
    Almeida, H.; Campello, M.; Laranjeira, B.; Weisbenner, S.
  • Governance and corporate philanthropy: restraining Robin Hood?
    Bartkus, B.; Morris, S.; Seifert, B.
  • The Vanke donation crisis and corporate governance
    Bei, F.
  • Does government ownership affect the cost of debt? Evidence from privatization
    Borisova, G.; Megginson, W.L.
  • Government ownership and corporate governance: evidence from the EU
    Borisova, G.; Brockman, P.; Salas, J.M.; Zagorchev, A.
  • Corporate philanthropic practices
    Brown, W.O.; Helland, E.; Smith, J.K.
  • Control transfers, privatization, and corporate performance: efficiency gains in China’s listed companies
    Chen, G.; Firth, M.; Xin, Y.; Xu, L.P.
  • Political connections and preferential access to finance: the role of campaign contributions
    Claessens, S.; Feijen, E.; Laeven, L.
  • Boards: does one size fit all?
    Coles, J.L.; Daniel, N.D.; Naveen, L.
  • Corporate political contributions and stock returns
    Cooper, M.J.; Gulen, H.; Ovtchinnikov, A.V.
  • Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder value maximization: evidence from mergers
    Deng, X.; Kang, J.; Low, B.S.
  • The real effects of financial shocks: evidence from exogenous changes in analyst coverage
    Derrien, F.; Kecskes, A.
  • State-owned and privately-owned firms: an empirical analysis of profitability, leverage, and labor intensity
    Dewenter, K.; Malatesta, P.
  • Firm values and sovereign wealth fund investments
    Dewenter, K.; Han, X.; Malatesta, P.
  • Politically connected firms
    Faccio, M.
  • Political connections and corporate bailouts
    Faccio, M.; Masulis, R.W.; McConnell, J.J.
  • Politically connected CEOs, corporate governance, and post-IPO performance of China’s newly partially privatized firms
    Fan, J.P.H.; Wong, T.J.; Zhang, T.Y.
  • Corporate performance and CEO compensation in China
    Firth, M.; Fung, P.; Rui, O.M.
  • Estimating the value of political connections
    Fisman, R.
  • The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: a risk management perspective
    Godfrey, P.C.
  • Competition and bias
    Hong, H.; Kacperczyk, M.
  • Firm performance: the interactions of corporate social performance with innovation and industry differentiation
    Hull, C.E.; Rothenberg, S.
  • Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers
    Jensen, M.
  • Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure
    Jensen, M.; Meckling, W.H.
  • Managerial ownership and corporate social performance: evidence from privately owned Chinese firms’ response to the Sichuan earthquake
    Jia, M.; Zhang, Z.
  • When the government is the controlling shareholder
    Kahan, M.; Rock, E.
  • Free cash flow and shareholder gains in going private transactions
    Lehn, K.; Poulsen, A.
  • The corporate social responsibility (CSR) trend
    Lougee, B.; Wallace, J.
  • Agency problems of corporate philanthropy
    Masulis, R.W.; Reza, S.W.
  • Privatization and finance
    Megginson, W.
  • Do markets love misery? Stock prices and corporate philanthropic disaster response
    Muller, A.; Kraussl, R.
  • Why do corporations give to charity?
    Navarro, P.
  • State ownership and corporate governance
    Pargendler, M.
  • EFA keynote speech: corporate governance and corporate social responsibility: what do investors care about? What should investors care about?
    Starks, L.T.
  • Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors
    Yermack, D.
  • Corporate philanthropic disaster response and ownership type: evidence from Chinese firms’ response to the Sichuan earthquake
    Zhang, R.; Rezaee, Z.; Zhu, J.
  • Corporate ownership and equity risks and returns in China
    Zou, H.; Adams, M.B.