Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Stacy Eller, P. Hartley, K. Medlock (2011)
Empirical evidence on the operational efficiency of National Oil CompaniesEmpirical Economics, 40
P. Buckley, J. Clegg, A. Cross, Xin Liu, Hinrich Voss, P. Zheng (2007)
The determinants of Chinese outward foreign direct investmentJournal of International Business Studies, 38
Karligash Kenjegalieva, Richard Simper, T. Weyman-Jones, V. Zelenyuk (2009)
Comparative analysis of banking production frameworks in eastern european financial marketsEur. J. Oper. Res., 198
Paul Romer, Robert Lucas, Charles Jones, Oded Galor, Danny Quah (2002)
Technological Change, Technological Catch-up, and Capital Deepening: Relative Contributions to Growth and ConvergenceThe American Economic Review, 92
Yi-Tui Chen, Chung-Chiang Chen (2012)
The privatization effect of MSW incineration services by using data envelopment analysis.Waste management, 32 3
A. Boardman, A. Vining (1989)
Ownership and Performance in Competitive Environments: A Comparison of the Performance of Private, Mixed, and State-Owned EnterprisesThe Journal of Law and Economics, 32
L. Simar, V. Zelenyuk (2006)
On Testing Equality of Distributions of Technical Efficiency ScoresEconometric Reviews, 25
H. Demsetz (1967)
Toward a Theory of Property RightsThe American Economic Review
Chidi. Ike, Hyunjung Lee (2014)
Measurement of the efficiency and productivity of national oil companies and its determinantsGeosystem Engineering, 17
Meryem Fethi, Fotios Pasiouras (2009)
Assessing Bank Efficiency and Performance with Operational Research and Artificial Intelligence Techniques: A SurveyBanking & Financial Institutions
P. Wanke, C. Barros, J. Faria (2015)
Financial distress drivers in Brazilian banks: A dynamic slacks approachEur. J. Oper. Res., 240
A. Kumar (2016)
Government interference in oil and gas business: less in India; minimum government, maximum governance
Binlei Gong (2018)
Different Behaviors in Natural Gas Production Between National and Private Oil Companies: Economics-Driven or Environment-Driven?Shale Energy Revolution
Shiu‐Wan Hung, Dong-Sing He, Wen‐Min Lu (2014)
Evaluating the dynamic performances of business groups from the carry-over perspective: A case study of Taiwan׳s semiconductor industryOmega-international Journal of Management Science, 46
Alvaro Cuervo‐Cazurra, Andrew Inkpen, A. Musacchio, K. Ramaswamy (2014)
Governments as owners: State-owned multinational companiesJournal of International Business Studies, 45
Dong-hyun Oh, Jeong-Dong Lee (2010)
A metafrontier approach for measuring Malmquist productivity indexEmpirical Economics, 38
Christian Wolf (2009)
Does Ownership Matter? The Performance and Efficiency of State Oil vs. Private Oil (1987-2006)Public Choice & Political Economy eJournal
L. Simar, P. Wilson (2011)
Inference by the m out of n bootstrap in nonparametric frontier modelsJournal of Productivity Analysis, 36
L. Simar, P. Wilson (2002)
Non-parametric tests of returns to scaleEur. J. Oper. Res., 139
R. Thompson, P. Dharmapala, Louis Rothenberg, R. Thrall (1994)
DEA ARs and CRs applied to worldwide major oil companiesJournal of Productivity Analysis, 5
G. Battese, D. Rao (2002)
Technology Gap, Efficiency, and a Stochastic Metafrontier FunctionInternational journal of business and economics, 1
Kathryn Dewenter, Paul Malatesta (2001)
State-Owned and Privately Owned Firms: An Empirical Analysis of Profitability, Leverage, and Labor IntensityThe American Economic Review, 91
(2015)
piw top 50
A. Al-Obaidan, G. Scully (1992)
Efficiency differences between private and state-owned enterprises in the international petroleum industryApplied Economics, 24
Qunwei Wang, Huiming Zhang, Wei Zhang (2013)
A Malmquist CO2 emission performance index based on a metafrontier approachMath. Comput. Model., 58
K. Tone, M. Tsutsui (2010)
Dynamic DEA: A slacks-based measure approachOmega-international Journal of Management Science, 38
R. Thompson, P. Dharmapala, Louis Rothenberg, R. Thrall (1996)
DEA/AR efficiency and profitability of 14 major oil companies in U.S. exploration and productionComput. Oper. Res., 23
Kwaku Ohene-Asare, C. Turkson, Anthony Afful-Dadzie (2017)
Multinational operation, ownership and efficiency differences in the international oil industryEnergy Economics, 68
C. O'Donnell, D. Rao, G. Battese (2008)
Metafrontier frameworks for the study of firm-level efficiencies and technology ratiosEmpirical Economics, 34
S. Sheather, M. Jones (1991)
A reliable data-based bandwidth selection method for kernel density estimationJournal of the royal statistical society series b-methodological, 53
Yuan Ding, Hua Zhang, Junxi Zhang (2007)
Private vs State Ownership and Earnings Management: Evidence from Chinese Listed CompaniesEmerging Markets: Finance
G. Battese, D. Rao, C. O'Donnell (2004)
A Metafrontier Production Function for Estimation of Technical Efficiencies and Technology Gaps for Firms Operating Under Different TechnologiesJournal of Productivity Analysis, 21
European Journal of Operational Research, 204
M. Li, Lin Cui, Jiangyong Lu (2014)
Varieties in state capitalism: Outward FDI strategies of central and local state-owned enterprises from emerging economy countriesJournal of International Business Studies, 45
Gong-meng Chen, M. Firth, Liping Xu (2009)
Does the type of ownership control matter? Evidence from China's listed companiesJournal of Banking and Finance, 33
A. Alchian, H. Demsetz (1973)
The Property Right ParadigmThe Journal of Economic History, 33
K. Raffiee, J. Wendel (1991)
Interactions between hospital admissions, cost per day and average length of stayApplied Economics, 23
The purpose of this study is to examine efficiency differences among petroleum firms based on their ownership status, with the aim of helping these firms understand how specific levels of state-ownership affects efficiency and to bring new perspective to the ownership-performance literature.Design/methodology/approachThe study uses ten-year data (2001-2010) of 32 global petroleum firms categorized into four groups based on ownership types. The metafrontier analysis is used with the dynamic slack-based measure to estimate dynamic efficiency differences among the groups while respectively, accounting for carryover variables such as oil and gas reserves.FindingsFully state-owned firms outperformed private, majority and minority state-owned firms, indicating that not all types of state-owned petroleum firms are outperformed by private firms. Additionally, firms with shared ownership between state and private are seen to have a lesser comparative advantage in the industry than those with full private or state ownership.Practical implicationsJointly owned petroleum firms should consider converting ownership to either full private or full state control. Conflict management measures should be used to handle possible conflicts between different shareholding groups.Originality/valueThis is among the first studies to sub-group state ownership into various levels to comprehensively examine specific levels of state ownership that is detrimental to the performance of petroleum firms. It is also the premier oil efficiency study to use the metafrontier framework to cater for group heterogeneity. The study treats oil and gas reserves as interconnecting variables that are not consumed only in the period for which they are discovered to ensure fair assessment.
International Journal of Energy Sector Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Feb 11, 2020
Keywords: Linear programming; Energy efficiency; Data envelopment analysis; Optimization; Oil and gas; DEA; Metafrontier; DSBM; Ownership and performance; Energy efficiency
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.