Overhead scanners: reports from the field

Overhead scanners: reports from the field Purpose – The purpose of this research is to gather information about user experiences with overhead scanners, in order to better inform purchasing decisions. Design/methodology/approach – The method of obtaining information was a survey, publicized via several listservs frequented by higher education digitization personnel, and available for four months in 2010. Participants were asked to identify their scanner, rate the extent to which they would recommend it, and describe usage patterns, speed, problems they encountered with hardware and software, and also what they like about their scanner. Findings – In total, 52 respondents described 71 scanners covering 19 different brands (30 models, two unspecified). The number of complaint entries for hardware and software were even, with 39 responses for each (55 per cent). When asked to what extent the respondent would recommend the product, 30 per cent (21 respondents) would highly recommend their scanner (“Yes, it's great!”), 39 per cent (28 respondents) said “Yes, it's pretty good”, 25 per cent (18 respondents) would only possibly recommend it, with caveats, and 6 per cent of respondents (four) would not recommend their scanner at all. Research limitations/implications – Only 52 respondents participated in the study, reporting on a wide variety of models and brands. Five brands accounted for 69 per cent of the responses, so the quantity of responses per brand or model was far from equivalent, which is a severe weakness in terms of generalization of findings. The survey was heavily designed for open‐ended responses, which are not easily quantifiable. Follow‐up surveys should be designed to capture more easily quantifiable results, and, if possible, a larger and roughly equivalent number of responses for each model included. Practical implications – Results of the survey will provide potential purchasers of overhead scanners with information that will assist them in making informed decisions and avoid expensive mistakes. Social implications – This paper gathers reports about the performance of a wide variety of overhead scanners in the field, which will help inform purchasing decisions in the immediate future. Originality/value – This paper gathers reports about the performance of a wide variety of overhead scanners in the field, which will help inform purchasing decisions in the immediate future. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Library Hi Tech Emerald Publishing

Overhead scanners: reports from the field

Library Hi Tech, Volume 29 (1): 25 – Mar 8, 2011

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/overhead-scanners-reports-from-the-field-1l1Ie6Vaqa
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
0737-8831
DOI
10.1108/07378831111116877
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this research is to gather information about user experiences with overhead scanners, in order to better inform purchasing decisions. Design/methodology/approach – The method of obtaining information was a survey, publicized via several listservs frequented by higher education digitization personnel, and available for four months in 2010. Participants were asked to identify their scanner, rate the extent to which they would recommend it, and describe usage patterns, speed, problems they encountered with hardware and software, and also what they like about their scanner. Findings – In total, 52 respondents described 71 scanners covering 19 different brands (30 models, two unspecified). The number of complaint entries for hardware and software were even, with 39 responses for each (55 per cent). When asked to what extent the respondent would recommend the product, 30 per cent (21 respondents) would highly recommend their scanner (“Yes, it's great!”), 39 per cent (28 respondents) said “Yes, it's pretty good”, 25 per cent (18 respondents) would only possibly recommend it, with caveats, and 6 per cent of respondents (four) would not recommend their scanner at all. Research limitations/implications – Only 52 respondents participated in the study, reporting on a wide variety of models and brands. Five brands accounted for 69 per cent of the responses, so the quantity of responses per brand or model was far from equivalent, which is a severe weakness in terms of generalization of findings. The survey was heavily designed for open‐ended responses, which are not easily quantifiable. Follow‐up surveys should be designed to capture more easily quantifiable results, and, if possible, a larger and roughly equivalent number of responses for each model included. Practical implications – Results of the survey will provide potential purchasers of overhead scanners with information that will assist them in making informed decisions and avoid expensive mistakes. Social implications – This paper gathers reports about the performance of a wide variety of overhead scanners in the field, which will help inform purchasing decisions in the immediate future. Originality/value – This paper gathers reports about the performance of a wide variety of overhead scanners in the field, which will help inform purchasing decisions in the immediate future.

Journal

Library Hi TechEmerald Publishing

Published: Mar 8, 2011

Keywords: Digital libraries; Photography

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create folders to
organize your research

Export folders, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off