Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Journal of Forecasting, 29
Review of Financial Studies, 19
European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 5
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39
The Journal of Business, 59
International Review of Economics and Finance, 56
The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review, 32
Financial Analysts Journal, 55
The Journal of Finance, 19
The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116
Journal of Political Economy, 60
Journal of the European Economic Association, 9
Review of Finance, 13
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3
Journal of Behavioral Finance, 13
The Journal of Finance, 64
European Financial Management, 14
The American Economic Review, 98
The Journal of Finance, 64
American Economic Review, 89
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11
Journal of Forecasting, 9
The Journal of Finance, 53
European Journal of Operational Research, 203
European Economic Review, 42
The Journal of Behavioral Finance, 9
Review of Financial Studies, 22
American Economic Review, 89
International Journal of Revenue Management, 10
Psychological Review, 98
The Review of Economics and Statistics, 47
Personality and Individual Differences, 19
Australian Journal of Management, 32
Journal of Financial Counseling and Planning, 22
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57
This paper aims to investigate how overconfidence bias affects financial market participants’ forecast accuracy based on the hard–easy effect concept of overconfidence research.Design/methodology/approachThe authors adopt an experimental method for behavioural finance studies. In the experiment, the authors measure and capture participants’ forecast accuracy as well as their individual confidence level. In particular, participants make incentive-compatible forecasts, that is, the elicited forecast determines the participants’ financial rewards in real monetary gain/loss.FindingsThe results show that the hard–easy effect causes optimistic forecasts for hard-to-predict stocks, indicating that overconfident investors tend to make over-optimistic and less accurate price forecasts when making judgements on hard tasks. Consistent with the literature, the authors find evidence of a negative relationship between forecast accuracy and confidence level. The results also indicate that the overall relationship between overconfidence and forecast accuracy is driven by the price forecasts made for hard-to-predict stocks.Originality/valueAs per the authors’ knowledge, this paper is one of the first studies that provides empirical evidence directly showing the hard–easy effect in the relation between overconfidence and forecast ability in an experimental setting. This study uses an experimental design that specifically measures the hard–easy effect in a stock market scenario using professional financial information and real monetary incentives, which have not been used in any previous studies of the hard–easy effect.
Studies in Economics and Finance – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jul 27, 2021
Keywords: Experimental finance; Overconfidence; Hard-easy effect; Stock price forecast accuracy
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.