Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Overconfidence and debiasing in the financial industry

Overconfidence and debiasing in the financial industry Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to measure overconfidence amongst finance professionals in domain relevant knowledge, and test for the impact of different debiasing methods. Design/methodology/approach – The approach used was survey field experiments with varying debiasing attempts. Findings – The subjects were overconfident in terms of probability calibration, better‐than‐average beliefs, and unfounded confidence. Debiasing attempts yielded mixed results. Explicit written warnings reduced better‐than‐average‐type of overconfidence. There was a further strong effect from attending lectures on investor psychology covering relevant examples. In contrast, there was only limited success in reducing miscalibration in probability assessments. Research limitations/implications – Different types of overconfidence are distinct and respond differentially to debiasing. Future research on debiasing professional judgment should concentrate on testing in‐depth/personally engaging methods. Practical implications – It is important for bankers to acknowledge the dangers of overconfidence. Correct confidence interval calibration is needed in order to have a sense of the risks involved in different asset allocation policies and trading strategies. Bankers should also be able to help their clients avoid overconfidence. Social implications – Debiasing overconfidence in the finance industry likely carries public benefits. The results imply that this task is not easy, but not impossible either. The authors think further investment in this endeavor is justified. Originality/value – Documenting an important judgment bias among finance professionals and estimating the effects of debiasing. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Review of Behavioral Finance Emerald Publishing

Overconfidence and debiasing in the financial industry

Markku Kaustia; Milla Perttula
Review of Behavioral Finance , Volume 4 (1): 17 – Jul 6, 2012
Download PDF
17 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/overconfidence-and-debiasing-in-the-financial-industry-Sa58erKvdN

References (50)

Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
1940-5979
DOI
10.1108/19405971211261100
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to measure overconfidence amongst finance professionals in domain relevant knowledge, and test for the impact of different debiasing methods. Design/methodology/approach – The approach used was survey field experiments with varying debiasing attempts. Findings – The subjects were overconfident in terms of probability calibration, better‐than‐average beliefs, and unfounded confidence. Debiasing attempts yielded mixed results. Explicit written warnings reduced better‐than‐average‐type of overconfidence. There was a further strong effect from attending lectures on investor psychology covering relevant examples. In contrast, there was only limited success in reducing miscalibration in probability assessments. Research limitations/implications – Different types of overconfidence are distinct and respond differentially to debiasing. Future research on debiasing professional judgment should concentrate on testing in‐depth/personally engaging methods. Practical implications – It is important for bankers to acknowledge the dangers of overconfidence. Correct confidence interval calibration is needed in order to have a sense of the risks involved in different asset allocation policies and trading strategies. Bankers should also be able to help their clients avoid overconfidence. Social implications – Debiasing overconfidence in the finance industry likely carries public benefits. The results imply that this task is not easy, but not impossible either. The authors think further investment in this endeavor is justified. Originality/value – Documenting an important judgment bias among finance professionals and estimating the effects of debiasing.

Journal

Review of Behavioral Finance – Emerald Publishing

Published: Jul 6, 2012

Keywords: Overconfidence; Debiasing; Bankers; Financial advisors; Banking; Finance

There are no references for this article.