Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
International Journal of Learning and Change, 4
Judith White, Rita Weathersby (2005)
Can universities become true learning organizationsThe Learning Organization, 12
Training & Development, 50
E. Martin (1999)
Changing Academic Work: Developing the Learning University
P. Senge (1991)
The fifth discipline : the art and practice of the learning organization/ Peter M. Senge
P. Lorange (1996)
A business school as a learning organizationThe Learning Organization, 3
Anders Örtenblad (2010)
Who needs contingency approaches and guidelines in order to adapt vague management ideasInternational Journal of Learning and Change, 4
D. Dill (1999)
Academic accountability and university adaptation: The architecture of an academic learning organizationHigher Education, 38
Glenys Patterson (1999)
The learning universityThe Learning Organization, 6
M. Pedler, J. Burgoyne, T. Boydell (1994)
The Learning Company: A Strategy for Sustainable Development
Anders Örtenblad (2002)
A Typology of the Idea of Learning OrganizationManagement Learning, 33
T. Cummings, C. Worley (1975)
Organization development and change
D. Jamali, Y. Sidani, C. Zouein (2009)
The learning organization: tracking progress in a developing country: A comparative analysis using the DLOQThe Learning Organization, 16
Olivier Serrat (2017)
Building a Learning Organization
Training & Development, 52
Cynthia Pantazis (1996)
The State of Lifelong Learning.Training & Development, 50
Miguel Hernández, Karen Watkins (2003)
Translation, validation and adaptation of the Spanish version of the modified Dimensions of the Learning Organization QuestionnaireHuman Resource Development International, 6
H. Basim, Harun Şeşen, Haluk Korkmazyürek (2007)
A Turkish Translation, Validity and Reliability Study of the Dimensions of the Learning Organization Questionnaire
I. Portfelt (2006)
The University; A Learning Organization? : An Illuminative Review Based on System Theory
B. Kristensen (1999)
The Entrepreneurial University as a Learning University.Higher Education in Europe, 24
N. Tichy, E. Cohen (1998)
The Learning (Teaching) Organization.Training & Development, 52
S. Akhtar, Ahmed Arif, Erum Rubi, S. Naveed, Shaheed Zulfiqar, A. Bhutto (2011)
IMPACT OF ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING ON ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE: STUDY OF HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTES
Anders Örtenblad, Riina Koris (2014)
Is the learning organization idea relevant to higher educational institutions? A literature review and a “multi-stakeholder contingency approach”International Journal of Educational Management, 28
Raili Moilanen (2001)
Diagnostic tools for learning organizations (Инструменты диагностики научающейся организации), 8
PurposeThis paper aims to measure the organizational learning in two of Estonia’s Higher Education Institutions (HEI) and identify connections between the organizational learning and various characteristics of HEI, such as ownership form and market participation rate.Design/methodology/approachWatkins and Marsick’s learning organization questionnaire, the Dimensions of the Learning Organization Questionnaire (DLOQ), as one of the most popular organizational learning measurement instruments, was taken to measure the organizational learning of HEIs. Employees from a total of two Estonian HEIs, which differ in several characteristics, completed the Watkins and Marsick’s questionnaire. To identify the dependence of organizational learning on two observed HEIs’ characteristics, the ordinary least squares (OLS) regression analysis method was used. The analysis was performed at the DLOQ dimensions level.FindingsThe average organizational learning rate of the two universities under study was over average (3.72 on six-point Likert scale) which allows arguing that both observed institutions are learning organizations. The organizational learning rate based on samples of employees from two HEI-s depends on the institution`s market participation on the 90 per cent level in the first dimension, 95 per cent in the second dimension and 90 per cent in the sixth dimension. Correlation between the HEI ownership form and any of the DLOQ dimensions is weak.Research limitations/implicationsThe study is based on two universities. The sample size is insufficient; therefore, the results cannot be generalized to HEIs as a whole.Originality/valueThe relationship between higher education institutions’ organizational learning and higher education institutions’ characteristics has not been investigated before. The results of this paper allow a better focus on different aspects of organizational learning in HEIs’ development and relate to their specific development needs.
The Learning Organization – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jul 10, 2017
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.