Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Organisational culture An exploratory study comparing faculties' perspectives within public and private universities in Malaysia

Organisational culture An exploratory study comparing faculties' perspectives within public and... Purpose – The main objective of this paper to study the organisational culture (OC) in private and public higher education institutions (HEIs) from the perspective of faculty members in order to provide empirical insights on the differences and consequently pave an avenue for cross‐learning. Design/methodology/approach – Data were collected from 594 faculty members (33.9 per cent from public HEIs and 52.8 per cent from private HEIs) using the competing values framework (CVF). Findings – The factor analysis results reveal an important confirmation of the theoretical findings in the literature with respect to the four OC types (i.e. clan, adhocracy, hierarchical, and market) that were originally developed for use in the corporate sector. The independent sample t ‐test results suggest that the faculty members perceive all the four OC types as being significantly different between public and private HEIs. Practical implications – This paper raises awareness and provides initial guidelines to both public and private HEIs in formulating strategies on how to deal properly with their OC from the perspective of their faculty members for the attainment of organisational goals and vision. Originality/value – This article extends knowledge on OC differences between the public and private higher education – an enabler for change management of sorts. Being among the first of its kind, it further opens up new lines of future research possibilities. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png International Journal of Educational Management Emerald Publishing

Organisational culture An exploratory study comparing faculties' perspectives within public and private universities in Malaysia

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/organisational-culture-an-exploratory-study-comparing-faculties-7w06EKhJ60

References (85)

Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
0951-354X
DOI
10.1108/09513541111159086
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – The main objective of this paper to study the organisational culture (OC) in private and public higher education institutions (HEIs) from the perspective of faculty members in order to provide empirical insights on the differences and consequently pave an avenue for cross‐learning. Design/methodology/approach – Data were collected from 594 faculty members (33.9 per cent from public HEIs and 52.8 per cent from private HEIs) using the competing values framework (CVF). Findings – The factor analysis results reveal an important confirmation of the theoretical findings in the literature with respect to the four OC types (i.e. clan, adhocracy, hierarchical, and market) that were originally developed for use in the corporate sector. The independent sample t ‐test results suggest that the faculty members perceive all the four OC types as being significantly different between public and private HEIs. Practical implications – This paper raises awareness and provides initial guidelines to both public and private HEIs in formulating strategies on how to deal properly with their OC from the perspective of their faculty members for the attainment of organisational goals and vision. Originality/value – This article extends knowledge on OC differences between the public and private higher education – an enabler for change management of sorts. Being among the first of its kind, it further opens up new lines of future research possibilities.

Journal

International Journal of Educational ManagementEmerald Publishing

Published: Aug 16, 2011

Keywords: Organisational culture; Competing values framework; Academics; Malaysia; Private and public higher education institutions

There are no references for this article.