Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Organisation matters: towards an organisational sociology of science communication

Organisation matters: towards an organisational sociology of science communication This paper looks at science communication through an organisational lens with the aim of assessing the relevance of different organisational forms for science communication.Design/methodology/approachThe paper explores science communication in different organisational forms. Based on conceptual considerations and by reviewing existing empirical literature, the paper selects and compares three organisational forms of science communication: the editorial office of a daily newspaper, the press office of a university and the Science Media Centre.FindingsThe paper shows the relevance of organisation for science communication by comparing three organisational forms. The first two, the science news desk and the press office, have the character of a sub-system of an organisation, while the third, the Science Media Centre, forms its own organisation. The paper shows how the respective set-up shapes science-media contacts with a focus on the occurrence and resolution of conflicts.Research limitations/implicationsThe paper proposes a conceptual framework for studying science communication through an organisational lens but leaves comparative empirical studies of all types to future research. Yet, it outlines and compares implications of the formal organisation of science communication from a conceptual point of view.Practical implicationsThe findings provide information on the structural impact of different organisational forms on science communication and point to where conflicting expectations, and thus potential conflicts, are most likely to occur in each case. A reflection of structurally conflicting expectations and how they can be overcome in specific situations is of high practical value for all science communication activities.Originality/valueOrganisational theorists have long argued that organisations are the key to understanding society. Despite their undoubted relevance, however, organisations and their influence on science communication have so far been much less analysed – both conceptually and empirically – than its contents, its practices and its impacts on public understanding, public policy, and on science and scientists. The paper contributes to the emerging field with conceptual considerations towards an organisational sociology of science communication. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Communication Management Emerald Publishing

Organisation matters: towards an organisational sociology of science communication

Rödder, Simone
Journal of Communication Management , Volume 24 (3): 20 – Aug 18, 2020
Download PDF
20 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/organisation-matters-towards-an-organisational-sociology-of-science-KyXm8ESi5W
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
1363-254X
DOI
10.1108/jcom-06-2019-0093
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This paper looks at science communication through an organisational lens with the aim of assessing the relevance of different organisational forms for science communication.Design/methodology/approachThe paper explores science communication in different organisational forms. Based on conceptual considerations and by reviewing existing empirical literature, the paper selects and compares three organisational forms of science communication: the editorial office of a daily newspaper, the press office of a university and the Science Media Centre.FindingsThe paper shows the relevance of organisation for science communication by comparing three organisational forms. The first two, the science news desk and the press office, have the character of a sub-system of an organisation, while the third, the Science Media Centre, forms its own organisation. The paper shows how the respective set-up shapes science-media contacts with a focus on the occurrence and resolution of conflicts.Research limitations/implicationsThe paper proposes a conceptual framework for studying science communication through an organisational lens but leaves comparative empirical studies of all types to future research. Yet, it outlines and compares implications of the formal organisation of science communication from a conceptual point of view.Practical implicationsThe findings provide information on the structural impact of different organisational forms on science communication and point to where conflicting expectations, and thus potential conflicts, are most likely to occur in each case. A reflection of structurally conflicting expectations and how they can be overcome in specific situations is of high practical value for all science communication activities.Originality/valueOrganisational theorists have long argued that organisations are the key to understanding society. Despite their undoubted relevance, however, organisations and their influence on science communication have so far been much less analysed – both conceptually and empirically – than its contents, its practices and its impacts on public understanding, public policy, and on science and scientists. The paper contributes to the emerging field with conceptual considerations towards an organisational sociology of science communication.

Journal

Journal of Communication Management – Emerald Publishing

Published: Aug 18, 2020

Keywords: Newspapers; Research; Public relations; Conflict; Organisational communication

References

  • The mobilization of scientists for public engagement
    Bauer, M.W.; Jensen, P.
  • Moving beyond the linear model of expertise? IPCC and the test of adaptation
    Beck, S.
  • When scientists turn to the public: alternative routes in science communication
    Bucchi, M.
  • Science media: centre of attention
    Callaway, E.
  • Behind closed doors: scientists' and science communicators' discourses on science in society. A study across European research institutions
    Casini, S.; Neresini, F.
  • Preliminary notes on a study of newspaper accuracy
    Charnley, M.V.
  • Research institutions: neither doing science communication nor promoting ‘public’ relations
    Claessens, M.
  • How academic biologists and physicists view science outreach
    Ecklund, E.H.; James, S.A.; Lincoln, A.E.
  • Mapmakers and navigators, facts and values
    Edenhofer, O.; Minx, J.
  • Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm
    Entman, R.M.
  • Rankings and reactivity: how public measures recreate social worlds
    Espeland, W.; Sauder, M.
  • Einflussreich, aber wenig beachtet? Eine Meta-Studie zum Stand der deutschsprachigen Forschung über strategische Kommunikation von Wissenschaftsorganisationen
    Fähnrich, B.
  • Science media centers & the press, part 1 Does the UK model help journalists?
    Fox, F.; St Louis, C.
  • The structure of foreign news. The presentation of the Congo, Cuba and Cyprus crises in four Norwegian newspapers
    Galtung, J.; Ruge, M.H.
  • Media images and the social construction of reality
    Gamson, W.A.; Croteau, D.; Hoynes, W.; Sasson, T.
  • Cosmopolitans and locals: toward an analysis of latent social roles
    Gouldner, A.W.
  • Sociological perspectives on earth system modeling
    Grundmann, R.; Rödder, S.
  • A field of expertise, the organization, or science itself? Scientists' perception of representing research in public communication
    Horst, M.
  • The grand challenges discourse: transforming identity work in science and science policy
    Kaldewey, D.
  • Universität, Prestige, Organisation
    Kaube, J.
  • Science, politics, and rationality in a partisan era
    Kirchner, J.W.
  • Science journalists in Switzerland: results from a survey on professional goals, working conditions, and current changes
    Kristiansen, S.; Schäfer, M.S.; Lorencez, S.
  • Science in the news: a study of reporting genomics
    Kua, E.; Reder, M.; Grossel, M.J.
  • Popular science publishing and contributions to public discourse among university faculty
    Kyvik, S.
  • Organizational influence on scientists' efforts to go public: an empirical investigation
    Marcinkowski, F.; Kohring, M.; Fürst, S.; Friedrichsmeier, A.
  • Stakeholder relations in Australian science journalism
    McKinnon, M.; Black, B.; Bobillier, S.; Hood, K.; Parker, M.
  • Patterns of influence: local and cosmopolitan influentials
    Merton, R.K.
  • Institutionalized organizations. formal structure as myth and ceremony
    Meyer, J.W.; Rowan, B.
  • When homo academicus meets homo journalisticus: an inter-field study of collaboration and conflict in the communication of scientific research
    Møller Hartley, J.
  • Organizational prestige. Some functions and dysfunctions
    Perrow, C.
  • A society of organizations
    Perrow, C.
  • Science-media interface. It's time to reconsider
    Peters, H.P.; Brossard, D.; De Cheveigne, S.; Dunwoody, S.; Kallfass, M.; Miller, S.; Tsuchida, S.
  • Science media centres and public policy
    Rödder, S.
  • The question of newsworthiness
    Rosen, C.; Guenther, L.; Froehlich, K.
  • 'We take academic freedom quite seriously': how university media offices manage academic public communication
    Rowe, D.; Brass, K.
  • Öffentlichkeitsorientierung von Wissenschaftsinstitutionen und Wissenschaftsdisziplinen
    Serong, J.; Koppers, L.; Luschmann, E.; Molina Ramirez, A.; Kersting, K.; Rahnenführer, J.; Wormer, H.
  • Competing institutional logics in universities in the United Kingdom: schism in the church of reason
    Shields, R.; Watermeyer, R.
  • What's science? Where's science? Science journalism in German print media
    Summ, A.; Volpers, A.-M.
  • External communication and project performance: an investigation into the role of gatekeepers
    Tushman, M.L.; Katz, R.
  • Public intellectuals vs new public management: the defeat of public engagement in higher education
    Watermeyer, R.
  • Institutionalizing public engagement through research in UK universities: perceptions, predictions and paradoxes concerning the state of the art
    Watermeyer, R.; Lewis, J.
  • Crafting competition: media rankings and the forming of a global market for business schools
    Wedlin, L.
  • Science and the media
    Weingart, P.
  • Selling Science? Source struggles, public relations, and UK press coverage of animal human hybrid embryos
    Williams, A.; Gajevic, S.