Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
C. Mason (2011)
Eco-Labeling and Market Equilibria with Noisy Certification TestsEnvironmental and Resource Economics, 48
S. Hamilton, D. Zilberman (2006)
Green markets, eco-certification, and equilibrium fraudJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 52
R. Peeters (2013)
Rivalry Information Acquisition and DisclosureMicroeconomics: Intertemporal Firm Choice & Growth
Olivier Bonroy, Christos Constantatos (2015)
On the Economics of Labels: How Their Introduction Affects the Functioning of Markets and the Welfare of All ParticipantsMicroeconomics: Intertemporal Consumer Choice & Savings eJournal
Michael Galbreth, Bikram Ghosh (2013)
Competition and Sustainability: The Impact of Consumer AwarenessDecis. Sci., 44
A. Murray, B. Mills (2011)
Read the label! Energy Star appliance label awareness and uptake among U.S. consumersEnergy Economics, 33
Carol Heimer, R. Kagan, D. Levi‐Faur, D. Vogel (2010)
Regulation & Governance Best Article Prize winners for 2009Regulation & Governance, 4
Michael Mussa, S. Rosen (1978)
Monopoly and product qualityJournal of Economic Theory, 18
Journal of Industrial Economics, 57
K. Grunert (2011)
Sustainability in the Food Sector: A Consumer Behaviour PerspectiveInternational Journal on Food System Dynamics, 2
D. Bougherara, G. Grolleau, L. Thiébaut (2005)
Can Labelling Policies Do More Harm Than Good? An Analysis Applied to Environmental Labelling SchemesEuropean Journal of Law and Economics, 19
L. Bottega, J. Freitas (2009)
Public, Private and Nonprofit Regulation for Environmental QualityPSN: Environment (Topic)
A. Mantovani, C. Vergari (2013)
Hedonic vs Environmental Quality: Which Policy Can Help in Lowering Pollution Emissions?Microeconomics: Production
Adel Youssef, Chema Abderrazak (2009)
Multiplicity of Eco-Labels, Competition, and the EnvironmentJournal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, 7
Ibon Gallastegui (2002)
THE USE OF ECO-LABELS: A REVIEW OF THE LITERATUREEuropean Environment, 12
H. Nilsson, B. Tunçer, Å. Thidell (2004)
The use of eco-labeling like initiatives on food products to promote quality assurance—is there enough credibility?Journal of Cleaner Production, 12
C. Mason (2006)
An economic model of ecolabelingEnvironmental Modeling & Assessment, 11
Adel Youssef, R. Lahmandi‐Ayed (2008)
Eco-labelling, Competition and Environment: Endogenization of Labelling CriteriaEnvironmental and Resource Economics, 41
Dorothée Brécard (2017)
Consumer misperception of eco-labels, green market structure and welfareJournal of Regulatory Economics, 51
Liang Guo, Ying Zhao (2009)
Voluntary Quality Disclosure and Market InteractionQuantitative Marketing
A. Mantovani, C. Vergari (2017)
Environmental vs hedonic quality: which policy can help in lowering pollution emissions?Environment and Development Economics, 22
G. Amacher, E. Koskela, M. Ollikainen (2004)
Environmental quality competition and eco-labelingJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 47
C. Fischer, Thomas Lyon (2014)
Competing Environmental LabelsSRPN: CSR Enforcement Issues (Topic)
S. Arora, S. Gangopadhyay (1995)
Toward a theoretical model of voluntary overcomplianceJournal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 28
(2010)
Field information collection system for characteristic and tropical farming based on RFID
Steven Bernstein, B. Cashore (2007)
Can non-state global governance be legitimate? An analytical frameworkRegulation & Governance, 1
L. Bottega, P. Delacote, L. Ibanez (2009)
Labeling Policies and Market Behavior: Quality Standard and Voluntary Label AdoptionJournal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, 7
R. Horne (2009)
Limits to labels: The role of eco-labels in the assessment of product sustainability and routes to sustainable consumptionInternational Journal of Consumer Studies, 33
M. Delmas, Neil Lessem (2012)
Eco-Premium or Eco-Penalty? Eco-Labels and Quality in the Organic Wine MarketBusiness & Society, 56
Zhu Xingye, Y. Shouqi, Liu Jianrui, T. Yue (2010)
Principal component model and application for technical evaluation index of light and small sprinkler irrigation system.Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 26
David Ortega, H. Wang, N. Olynk, Laping Wu, J. Bai (2012)
Chinese Consumers' Demand for Food Safety Attributes: A Push for Government and Industry RegulationsAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 94
Antoine Beretti, G. Grolleau, Naoufel Mzoughi (2009)
How Cognitive Biases Can Affect the Performance of Eco-Labeling SchemesJournal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, 7
Oliver Board (2005)
Competition and DisclosureIO: Regulation
Social Science Electronic Publishing, 56
Jan Mysliveček (2008)
Comparing Certification and Self-Regulation
Rick Harbaugh, J. Maxwell, Beatrice Roussillon (2011)
Label Confusion: The Groucho Effect of Uncertain StandardsManag. Sci., 57
C. Fischer, Thomas Lyon (2016)
A Theory of Multitier Ecolabel CompetitionJournal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 6
Dorothée Brécard (2014)
Consumer confusion over the profusion of eco-labels: lessons from a double differentiation modelResource and Energy Economics, 37
Yi Li, Wenlan (2016)
Competing eco-labels and product market competition ! ! ! ! !
Benno Buehler, F. Schuett (2012)
Certification and Minimum Quality Standards When Some Consumers are UninformedMicroeconomics: Production
D. Dranove, G. Jin (2010)
Quality Disclosure and Certification: Theory and PracticeAuditing
Marketing Science, 28
The purpose of this paper is to find the optimal environmental quality criteria for a strategic eco-labeling authority with three objectives (i.e. maximizing the aggregate environmental quality, maximizing the industry profit and maximizing the social welfare). Particularly, the authors investigate how the existence of imperfectly informed consumers affects labeling criteria determination and competition among firms.Design/methodology/approachA game-theoretic modeling approach was adopted in this paper. A three-stage sequential game was modeled and backward induction was used to solve for a subgame perfect Nash equilibrium. To investigate the impacts of the existence of imperfectly informed consumers, the equilibrium, if all consumers are perfectly informed of the eco-label, was studied as a benchmark.FindingsA more strict eco-labeling criterion improves revenues for both the labeled and unlabeled firms. It is interesting to find that the eco-labeling criteria to maximize industry profits are stricter than the criteria to maximize social welfare. Moreover, when the fraction of imperfectly informed consumers increases, the eco-labeling criteria to maximize aggregate environmental quality or industry profits will be more strict, while the criteria to maximize the social welfare will be looser.Originality/valueThe authors analyze the equilibrium strategies for firms against the eco-labeling criteria certified by authority with different objectives. The obtained optimal labeling strategies could provide insightful guidelines for the certifying authority to select the best suitable labeling criteria to achieve its goals.
Industrial Management & Data Systems – Emerald Publishing
Published: Aug 7, 2019
Keywords: Competition; Eco-labelling criterion; Imperfectly informed consumers
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.